Does the degree of limitation in activities of daily living in geriatric patients influence the amount of care and case management required? An analysis from the RubiN project.

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY BMC Geriatrics Pub Date : 2025-04-07 DOI:10.1186/s12877-025-05855-3
Simone Gloystein, Heiko Krause, Sonja Laag, Neeltje van den Berg
{"title":"Does the degree of limitation in activities of daily living in geriatric patients influence the amount of care and case management required? An analysis from the RubiN project.","authors":"Simone Gloystein, Heiko Krause, Sonja Laag, Neeltje van den Berg","doi":"10.1186/s12877-025-05855-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The number of people in Germany over the age of 70 will increase significantly over the next 10 years. This will be accompanied by an increase in geriatric diseases and disabilities. An important goal for many geriatric patients is to remain in their own homes for as long as possible, while making use of support services. To achieve this, patients with limitations in their daily activities and in need of geriatric care should be identified as early as possible. The RubiN project implemented assessment-based care and case management for geriatric patients in physician networks in Germany. To support future planning, the present analysis investigated whether the intensity of case management increases with increasing limitations in patients' activities of daily living.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using the Barthel Index, an assessment tool to record patients' ability to perform activities of daily living, patients' current limitations were assessed for ten activities (eating; sitting up and moving; washing; toileting; bathing/showering; getting up and walking; climbing stairs; dressing/undressing; bowel incontinence; urinary incontinence). For each item, the score (0 to max. 15 points) is determined and added to the Barthel Index score (max. 100 points). Counselling and coordination services provided by case managers were documented according to medical, nursing, therapeutic and social counselling content. Linear multivariate analysis was performed to determine whether the Barthel Index score was a determinant of the intensity of care and case management.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two thousand three hundred six patients in the RubiN intervention group (65% female; mean age 81.5 years (SD 5.6)) were included in the analysis. 74% of these patients achieved a Barthel Index score between 100 and 85 points at baseline, and correspondingly, 26% of the patients had a Barthel Index score of 80 points or less. Problems with 'bathing/showering', 'getting up and walking', 'climbing stairs', 'dressing/undressing' and 'controlling urination' were the most common reasons for not achieving the maximum Barthel Index score of 100 points. A total of 26,833 patient contacts were documented by the care and case manager. On average, patients received 11.6 contacts (SD = 9.1). Social (31.8%) and medical (26.3%) counselling and coordination services were provided in the majority of contacts. \"Therapeutic counselling content\" and \"nursing counselling content\" were provided in 21.7% and 20.1% of contacts, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed a significant correlation between an decreasing Barthel Index and a higher number of contacts with the care and case manager.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Barthel Index score can be used to predict the intensity of care and assistance needed by geriatric patients. The scores provide a good basis for planning and implementing care and case management.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>German Clinical Trials Register, ID: DRKS00016642. Registered on 29.10.2019-retrospectively registered.</p>","PeriodicalId":9056,"journal":{"name":"BMC Geriatrics","volume":"25 1","pages":"227"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11974156/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Geriatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-025-05855-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The number of people in Germany over the age of 70 will increase significantly over the next 10 years. This will be accompanied by an increase in geriatric diseases and disabilities. An important goal for many geriatric patients is to remain in their own homes for as long as possible, while making use of support services. To achieve this, patients with limitations in their daily activities and in need of geriatric care should be identified as early as possible. The RubiN project implemented assessment-based care and case management for geriatric patients in physician networks in Germany. To support future planning, the present analysis investigated whether the intensity of case management increases with increasing limitations in patients' activities of daily living.

Methods: Using the Barthel Index, an assessment tool to record patients' ability to perform activities of daily living, patients' current limitations were assessed for ten activities (eating; sitting up and moving; washing; toileting; bathing/showering; getting up and walking; climbing stairs; dressing/undressing; bowel incontinence; urinary incontinence). For each item, the score (0 to max. 15 points) is determined and added to the Barthel Index score (max. 100 points). Counselling and coordination services provided by case managers were documented according to medical, nursing, therapeutic and social counselling content. Linear multivariate analysis was performed to determine whether the Barthel Index score was a determinant of the intensity of care and case management.

Results: Two thousand three hundred six patients in the RubiN intervention group (65% female; mean age 81.5 years (SD 5.6)) were included in the analysis. 74% of these patients achieved a Barthel Index score between 100 and 85 points at baseline, and correspondingly, 26% of the patients had a Barthel Index score of 80 points or less. Problems with 'bathing/showering', 'getting up and walking', 'climbing stairs', 'dressing/undressing' and 'controlling urination' were the most common reasons for not achieving the maximum Barthel Index score of 100 points. A total of 26,833 patient contacts were documented by the care and case manager. On average, patients received 11.6 contacts (SD = 9.1). Social (31.8%) and medical (26.3%) counselling and coordination services were provided in the majority of contacts. "Therapeutic counselling content" and "nursing counselling content" were provided in 21.7% and 20.1% of contacts, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed a significant correlation between an decreasing Barthel Index and a higher number of contacts with the care and case manager.

Conclusions: The Barthel Index score can be used to predict the intensity of care and assistance needed by geriatric patients. The scores provide a good basis for planning and implementing care and case management.

Trial registration: German Clinical Trials Register, ID: DRKS00016642. Registered on 29.10.2019-retrospectively registered.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
老年患者日常生活活动受限的程度是否会影响所需护理和病例管理的数量?来自RubiN项目的分析。
背景:未来10年,德国70岁以上的人口数量将显著增加。这将伴随着老年疾病和残疾的增加。许多老年患者的一个重要目标是尽可能长时间地留在自己家中,同时利用支助服务。为实现这一目标,应尽早发现日常活动受限和需要老年护理的患者。RubiN项目在德国的医生网络中为老年患者实施了基于评估的护理和病例管理。为了支持未来的规划,本分析调查了病例管理的强度是否随着患者日常生活活动限制的增加而增加。方法:采用Barthel指数(一种记录患者日常生活活动能力的评估工具),评估患者目前在10项活动(进食;坐起来活动;洗;个人卫生;洗澡/淋浴;站起来走走;爬楼梯;酱/脱衣;排便失禁;尿失禁)。对于每个项目,得分从0到最大值。15分),并加到巴特尔指数得分(最高15分)。100分)。根据医疗、护理、治疗和社会咨询的内容记录了个案管理人提供的咨询和协调服务。进行线性多变量分析以确定Barthel指数评分是否是护理强度和病例管理的决定因素。结果:RubiN干预组2600例患者(65%为女性;平均年龄81.5岁(SD 5.6))纳入分析。74%的患者在基线时Barthel指数得分在100到85分之间,相应地,26%的患者Barthel指数得分在80分或更低。“洗澡/淋浴”、“起床和走路”、“爬楼梯”、“穿衣服/脱衣服”和“控制小便”等问题是未能达到巴塞尔指数满分100分的最常见原因。护理和病例管理人员共记录了26,833名患者接触者。患者平均接受11.6次接触(SD = 9.1)。大多数接触提供了社会(31.8%)和医疗(26.3%)咨询和协调服务。21.7%的接触者提供“治疗咨询内容”,20.1%的接触者提供“护理咨询内容”。多变量分析显示,Barthel指数下降与护理人员和病例管理人员接触次数增加之间存在显著相关性。结论:Barthel指数评分可用于预测老年患者所需护理和帮助的强度。这些评分为规划和实施护理和病例管理提供了良好的依据。试验注册:德国临床试验注册,ID: DRKS00016642。于2019年10月29日注册-已追溯注册。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Geriatrics
BMC Geriatrics GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
7.30%
发文量
873
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Geriatrics is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in all aspects of the health and healthcare of older people, including the effects of healthcare systems and policies. The journal also welcomes research focused on the aging process, including cellular, genetic, and physiological processes and cognitive modifications.
期刊最新文献
Association between time-domain heart rate variability, diastolic dysfunction and unplanned readmission to cardiovascular department in older type 2 diabetes mellitus patients. Distinct mobility facets and their association with intrinsic capacity domains in (pre-)frail community-dwelling older adults: an application of the unified framework for measuring mobility. Meta-analysis of factors influencing depression in the elderly before and after the COVID-19 pandemic in 2023. PALLIHIP-study: Spinal Phenol IN Glycerol (SPING-block) in palliative, frail, older adults with a hip fracture: a study protocol. The impact of an intervention by a mobile geriatrics team including a pharmacist on potentially inappropriate drug prescription: results of the PharMoG study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1