Comparing STRATIFY JCV™ DxSelect™ and IMMUNOWELL™ JCV Tests in RRMS to Assess PML Risk.

IF 5.3 2区 医学 Q1 NEUROSCIENCES Current Neuropharmacology Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2174/011570159X372688250226110925
Aurora Zanghì, Fabiana Marinelli, Paola Sofia Di Filippo, Carlo Avolio, Emanuele D'Amico
{"title":"Comparing STRATIFY JCV™ DxSelect™ and IMMUNOWELL™ JCV Tests in RRMS to Assess PML Risk.","authors":"Aurora Zanghì, Fabiana Marinelli, Paola Sofia Di Filippo, Carlo Avolio, Emanuele D'Amico","doi":"10.2174/011570159X372688250226110925","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The risk of developing progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML), a rare but potentially fatal opportunistic infection of the central nervous system caused by the J.C. virus (JCV), remains a primary concern associated with natalizumab therapy in the clinical management of patients diagnosed with multiple sclerosis (MS).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This study compared two tests, STRATIFY JCV™ DxSelect™, and IMMUNOWELL ™ JCV antibody tests, for assessing the risk of PML in patients diagnosed with relapsing- remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) who had received disease-modifying therapy (DMT) with branded natalizumab (Tysabri®). The main objective was to determine the comparability of these tests in classifying PML risk. Eligible patients were selected from a database, and all specimens for the STRATIFY JCV™ DxSelect™ and IMMUNOWELL™ JCV antibody tests were collected on the same day. Patients were classified into three risk categories (low, intermediate, or high) based on threshold values for each test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis showed 85.5% agreement between the two tests for risk classification. Ten discordant cases were identified, mainly between intermediate- and high-risk categories. Compared to STRATIFY JCV™ DxSelect™, IMMUNOWELL™ JCV antibody test tended to categorize more patients as higher risk. No significant association was found between discordance and prior use of immunosuppressant drugs and >24 doses of natalizumab. The agreement between tests, assessed with the weighted Cohen's Kappa coefficient, was substantial (κ=0.6222).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared to the STRATIFY JCV™ DxSelect™, the IMMUNOWELL™ JCV test tends to place more patients in higher risk categories. Further, longitudinal studies are needed to evaluate the clinical impact of these differences in PML risk assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":10905,"journal":{"name":"Current Neuropharmacology","volume":" ","pages":"1294-1300"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12307996/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Neuropharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/011570159X372688250226110925","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The risk of developing progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML), a rare but potentially fatal opportunistic infection of the central nervous system caused by the J.C. virus (JCV), remains a primary concern associated with natalizumab therapy in the clinical management of patients diagnosed with multiple sclerosis (MS).

Materials and methods: This study compared two tests, STRATIFY JCV™ DxSelect™, and IMMUNOWELL ™ JCV antibody tests, for assessing the risk of PML in patients diagnosed with relapsing- remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) who had received disease-modifying therapy (DMT) with branded natalizumab (Tysabri®). The main objective was to determine the comparability of these tests in classifying PML risk. Eligible patients were selected from a database, and all specimens for the STRATIFY JCV™ DxSelect™ and IMMUNOWELL™ JCV antibody tests were collected on the same day. Patients were classified into three risk categories (low, intermediate, or high) based on threshold values for each test.

Results: The analysis showed 85.5% agreement between the two tests for risk classification. Ten discordant cases were identified, mainly between intermediate- and high-risk categories. Compared to STRATIFY JCV™ DxSelect™, IMMUNOWELL™ JCV antibody test tended to categorize more patients as higher risk. No significant association was found between discordance and prior use of immunosuppressant drugs and >24 doses of natalizumab. The agreement between tests, assessed with the weighted Cohen's Kappa coefficient, was substantial (κ=0.6222).

Conclusions: Compared to the STRATIFY JCV™ DxSelect™, the IMMUNOWELL™ JCV test tends to place more patients in higher risk categories. Further, longitudinal studies are needed to evaluate the clinical impact of these differences in PML risk assessment.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比较分层JCV™DxSelect™和IMMUNOWELL™JCV IgG检测在RRMS中评估PML风险
背景:进行性多灶性白质脑病(PML)是一种由J.C.病毒(JCV)引起的罕见但可能致命的中枢神经系统机会性感染,其发病风险仍然是纳他珠单抗治疗多发性硬化症(MS)患者临床管理中的一个主要问题:本研究比较了 STRATIFY JCV™ DxSelect™ 和 IMMUNOWELL ™ JCV IgG 两种检测方法,以评估接受过品牌纳他珠单抗 (Tysabri®) 疾病缓解疗法 (DMT) 的复发性多发性硬化症 (RRMS) 患者的 PML 风险。研究的主要目的是确定这些检验在分类 PML 风险方面的可比性。符合条件的患者是从数据库中挑选出来的,STRATIFY JCV™ DxSelect™ 和 IMMUNOWELL™ JCV IgG 检测的所有标本都是在同一天采集的。根据每项检测的阈值将患者分为三个风险类别(低、中、高):结果:分析表明,两种检测方法在风险分类上的一致性为 85.5%。发现了 10 个不一致的病例,主要介于中危和高危类别之间。与 STRATIFY JCV™ DxSelect™ 相比,IMMUNOWELL™ 倾向于将更多患者归为高风险。在不一致性与之前使用免疫抑制剂和纳他珠单抗剂量大于 24 次之间没有发现明显的关联。根据加权卡帕系数评估,测试之间的一致性为中等(κ=0.6222):结论:与 STRATIFY JCV™ DxSelect™ 相比,IMMUNOWELL™ JCV 检测倾向于将更多患者归入高风险类别。此外,还需要进行纵向研究,以评估这些差异对 PML 风险评估的临床影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Current Neuropharmacology
Current Neuropharmacology 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
1.90%
发文量
369
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Current Neuropharmacology aims to provide current, comprehensive/mini reviews and guest edited issues of all areas of neuropharmacology and related matters of neuroscience. The reviews cover the fields of molecular, cellular, and systems/behavioural aspects of neuropharmacology and neuroscience. The journal serves as a comprehensive, multidisciplinary expert forum for neuropharmacologists and neuroscientists.
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of Hemodynamic and Blood Oxygen Metabolism Alterations in Parkinson's Disease Using Quantitative MRI. Therapeutic Values of General Anesthetics: From Developmental Neurotoxicity to Neurotherapeutic Agents. Systematic Review of Artificial Intelligence Applications in Clinical Trials for Central Nervous System Injuries. Axonal Regeneration, Growth Cone, and the FIGN Gene Family: A Comprehensive Review. The Heart-Brain Axis in Heart Failure: Implications for Neuropharmacological Intervention.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1