{"title":"Research progress of measuring tools for nursing students' clinical learning environment.","authors":"Yun Xu, Qing Wang, Qi Wei","doi":"10.3389/fmed.2025.1458823","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To understand the current situation and progress of clinical learning environment measurement tools for nursing students, this paper reviews the relevant research on clinical learning environment measurement tools for nursing students.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three databases (Web of Science, PubMed, and CNKI) were searched for relevant articles. Research articles that met specific criteria were included, with identified articles initially screened by title and keyword. Then the abstracts were screened for relevance, and the full text was read for validation before inclusion. Descriptive analysis was performed with relevant findings from data retrieved from various sources.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 19 articles that met the criteria, and introduced nine measurement scales, which completed the reliability and validity test through empirical research, providing an important reference for the assessment of clinical learning environment for nursing students. The Clinical Learning Environment and Supervision instrument (CLESI) has been translated into many languages and is widely used.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This review includes multiple clinical learning environment measurement tools for nursing students, which have important value in evaluating the clinical environment of nursing students and can provide reference for scholars to carry out relevant research and practice. It also introduces the research prospects in this field, aiming to inspire future research.</p>","PeriodicalId":12488,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Medicine","volume":"12 ","pages":"1458823"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11973323/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2025.1458823","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To understand the current situation and progress of clinical learning environment measurement tools for nursing students, this paper reviews the relevant research on clinical learning environment measurement tools for nursing students.
Methods: Three databases (Web of Science, PubMed, and CNKI) were searched for relevant articles. Research articles that met specific criteria were included, with identified articles initially screened by title and keyword. Then the abstracts were screened for relevance, and the full text was read for validation before inclusion. Descriptive analysis was performed with relevant findings from data retrieved from various sources.
Results: We included 19 articles that met the criteria, and introduced nine measurement scales, which completed the reliability and validity test through empirical research, providing an important reference for the assessment of clinical learning environment for nursing students. The Clinical Learning Environment and Supervision instrument (CLESI) has been translated into many languages and is widely used.
Conclusion: This review includes multiple clinical learning environment measurement tools for nursing students, which have important value in evaluating the clinical environment of nursing students and can provide reference for scholars to carry out relevant research and practice. It also introduces the research prospects in this field, aiming to inspire future research.
目的：了解护生临床学习环境测量工具的现状与进展，综述护生临床学习环境测量工具的相关研究。方法：检索Web of Science、PubMed、CNKI三个数据库的相关文章。符合特定标准的研究文章被包括在内，被识别的文章最初通过标题和关键字筛选。然后对摘要进行相关性筛选，并在纳入之前阅读全文以进行验证。对从各种来源检索的数据中的相关发现进行描述性分析。结果：纳入符合标准的文献19篇，引入9份测量量表，通过实证研究完成信效度检验，为护理生临床学习环境评价提供重要参考。临床学习环境与监督工具（CLESI）已被翻译成多种语言并被广泛使用。结论：本文综述了多种护生临床学习环境测量工具，对评估护生临床学习环境具有重要价值，可为学者开展相关研究和实践提供参考。介绍了该领域的研究前景，以期对今后的研究有所启发。
期刊介绍：
Frontiers in Medicine publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research linking basic research to clinical practice and patient care, as well as translating scientific advances into new therapies and diagnostic tools. Led by an outstanding Editorial Board of international experts, this multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide.
In addition to papers that provide a link between basic research and clinical practice, a particular emphasis is given to studies that are directly relevant to patient care. In this spirit, the journal publishes the latest research results and medical knowledge that facilitate the translation of scientific advances into new therapies or diagnostic tools. The full listing of the Specialty Sections represented by Frontiers in Medicine is as listed below. As well as the established medical disciplines, Frontiers in Medicine is launching new sections that together will facilitate
- the use of patient-reported outcomes under real world conditions
- the exploitation of big data and the use of novel information and communication tools in the assessment of new medicines
- the scientific bases for guidelines and decisions from regulatory authorities
- access to medicinal products and medical devices worldwide
- addressing the grand health challenges around the world
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
