Jueun Park, Suhyeon Ha, Hyunhee Kwon, Seong Chul Kim, Jung-Man Namgoong, Dae Yeon Kim
{"title":"Prognosis analysis of sacrococcygeal teratoma-compared with patient size.","authors":"Jueun Park, Suhyeon Ha, Hyunhee Kwon, Seong Chul Kim, Jung-Man Namgoong, Dae Yeon Kim","doi":"10.3389/fped.2025.1513825","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Advancements in prenatal care have underscored the importance of understanding postnatal outcomes and prognosis in sacrococcygeal teratoma (SCT). However, giant SCTs continue to pose surgical challenges and are associated with increased morbidity and mortality. A clear, objective threshold for defining a \"large\" tumor relative to the patient's size remains undefined. This study aimed to establish objective tumor size indicators for predicting surgical outcomes and prognosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from 97 patients diagnosed with and surgically treated for SCT at Asan Medical Center from 2000 to 2021 was retrospectively reviewed. The tumor volume/birthweight ratio (VWR) and tumor length/height at birth ratio (LHR) were measured. Surgical outcomes and prognosis were evaluated based on these measures, including surgical complications, concomitant surgeries, long-term complications, and recurrence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After surgery, 38 patients experienced short-term complications, 18 required additional operations, 16 developed long-term complications, and 14 experienced tumor recurrence. Both VWR and LHR correlated with short and long-term complications, additional surgeries, and recurrence.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The small patient population limited the determination of precise cut-off values; however, a significant difference was observed between groups stratified by the most predictive cut-off values. Both objective tumor size indicators were significantly associated with prognosis and surgical outcomes. Notably, both indicators exhibited comparable predictive capabilities without discrepancies.</p>","PeriodicalId":12637,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Pediatrics","volume":"13 ","pages":"1513825"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11973306/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2025.1513825","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Advancements in prenatal care have underscored the importance of understanding postnatal outcomes and prognosis in sacrococcygeal teratoma (SCT). However, giant SCTs continue to pose surgical challenges and are associated with increased morbidity and mortality. A clear, objective threshold for defining a "large" tumor relative to the patient's size remains undefined. This study aimed to establish objective tumor size indicators for predicting surgical outcomes and prognosis.
Methods: Data from 97 patients diagnosed with and surgically treated for SCT at Asan Medical Center from 2000 to 2021 was retrospectively reviewed. The tumor volume/birthweight ratio (VWR) and tumor length/height at birth ratio (LHR) were measured. Surgical outcomes and prognosis were evaluated based on these measures, including surgical complications, concomitant surgeries, long-term complications, and recurrence.
Results: After surgery, 38 patients experienced short-term complications, 18 required additional operations, 16 developed long-term complications, and 14 experienced tumor recurrence. Both VWR and LHR correlated with short and long-term complications, additional surgeries, and recurrence.
Discussion: The small patient population limited the determination of precise cut-off values; however, a significant difference was observed between groups stratified by the most predictive cut-off values. Both objective tumor size indicators were significantly associated with prognosis and surgical outcomes. Notably, both indicators exhibited comparable predictive capabilities without discrepancies.
期刊介绍:
Frontiers in Pediatrics (Impact Factor 2.33) publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research broadly across the field, from basic to clinical research that meets ongoing challenges in pediatric patient care and child health. Field Chief Editors Arjan Te Pas at Leiden University and Michael L. Moritz at the Children''s Hospital of Pittsburgh are supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international experts. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide.
Frontiers in Pediatrics also features Research Topics, Frontiers special theme-focused issues managed by Guest Associate Editors, addressing important areas in pediatrics. In this fashion, Frontiers serves as an outlet to publish the broadest aspects of pediatrics in both basic and clinical research, including high-quality reviews, case reports, editorials and commentaries related to all aspects of pediatrics.