Design and evaluation of new user control devices for improved ergonomics in flexible robotic endoscopy.

IF 3 Q2 ROBOTICS Frontiers in Robotics and AI Pub Date : 2025-03-24 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/frobt.2025.1559574
Leander Heisterberg, Luigi Manfredi, Dörte Wichmann, Thomas Maier, Peter P Pott
{"title":"Design and evaluation of new user control devices for improved ergonomics in flexible robotic endoscopy.","authors":"Leander Heisterberg, Luigi Manfredi, Dörte Wichmann, Thomas Maier, Peter P Pott","doi":"10.3389/frobt.2025.1559574","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The ergonomics of flexible endoscopes require improvement as the current design carries a high risk of musculoskeletal injury for endoscopists. Robotic systems offer a solution by separating the endoscope from the control handle, allowing a focus on ergonomics and usability. Despite the increasing interest in this field, little attention has been paid towards developing ergonomic human input devices. This study addresses two key questions: How can handheld control devices for flexible robotic endoscopy be designed to prioritize ergonomics and usability? And, how effective are these new devices in a simulated clinical environment?</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Addressing this gap, the study proposes two handheld input device models for controlling a flexible endoscope in four degrees of freedom (DOFs) and an endoscopic instrument in three DOFs. A two-stage evaluation was conducted with six endoscopists evaluating the physical ergonomics and a final clinical user evaluation with seven endoscopists using a virtual colonoscopy simulator with proportional velocity and position mapping.</p><p><strong>Results and discussion: </strong>Both models demonstrated clinical suitability, with the first model scoring 4.8 and the second model scoring 5.2 out of 6 in the final evaluation. In sum, the study presents two designs of ergonomic control devices for robotic colonoscopy, which have the potential to reduce endoscopy-related injuries. Furthermore, the proposed colonoscopy simulator is useful to evaluate the benefits of different mapping modes. This could help to optimize the design and control mechanism of future control devices.</p>","PeriodicalId":47597,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Robotics and AI","volume":"12 ","pages":"1559574"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11973676/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Robotics and AI","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2025.1559574","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ROBOTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The ergonomics of flexible endoscopes require improvement as the current design carries a high risk of musculoskeletal injury for endoscopists. Robotic systems offer a solution by separating the endoscope from the control handle, allowing a focus on ergonomics and usability. Despite the increasing interest in this field, little attention has been paid towards developing ergonomic human input devices. This study addresses two key questions: How can handheld control devices for flexible robotic endoscopy be designed to prioritize ergonomics and usability? And, how effective are these new devices in a simulated clinical environment?

Methods: Addressing this gap, the study proposes two handheld input device models for controlling a flexible endoscope in four degrees of freedom (DOFs) and an endoscopic instrument in three DOFs. A two-stage evaluation was conducted with six endoscopists evaluating the physical ergonomics and a final clinical user evaluation with seven endoscopists using a virtual colonoscopy simulator with proportional velocity and position mapping.

Results and discussion: Both models demonstrated clinical suitability, with the first model scoring 4.8 and the second model scoring 5.2 out of 6 in the final evaluation. In sum, the study presents two designs of ergonomic control devices for robotic colonoscopy, which have the potential to reduce endoscopy-related injuries. Furthermore, the proposed colonoscopy simulator is useful to evaluate the benefits of different mapping modes. This could help to optimize the design and control mechanism of future control devices.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
改进柔性机器人内窥镜人机工程学的新型用户控制装置的设计与评价。
背景:柔性内窥镜的人体工程学需要改进,因为目前的设计对内窥镜医生来说有很高的肌肉骨骼损伤风险。机器人系统提供了一种解决方案,将内窥镜与控制手柄分离,从而专注于人体工程学和可用性。尽管人们对这一领域的兴趣日益浓厚,但对开发符合人体工程学的人体输入设备的关注却很少。本研究解决了两个关键问题:如何设计用于柔性机器人内窥镜的手持控制设备以优先考虑人体工程学和可用性?这些新设备在模拟临床环境中的效果如何?方法:为了解决这一问题,本研究提出了两种手持式输入设备模型,分别用于控制四自由度柔性内窥镜和三自由度内窥镜仪器。6名内窥镜医师评估物理工效学,7名内窥镜医师使用具有比例速度和位置映射的虚拟结肠镜模拟器进行最后的临床用户评估。结果与讨论:两种模型均表现出临床适用性,在最终评价中,第一种模型得分为4.8分,第二种模型得分为5.2分(满分为6分)。总之,本研究提出了两种机器人结肠镜人机工程学控制装置的设计,它们具有减少内窥镜相关损伤的潜力。此外,提出的结肠镜模拟器是有用的,以评估不同的映射模式的好处。这有助于优化未来控制装置的设计和控制机构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
5.90%
发文量
355
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Robotics and AI publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research covering all theory and applications of robotics, technology, and artificial intelligence, from biomedical to space robotics.
期刊最新文献
Robots, ledgers, and RevPAR: a blockchain-enabled AI-robotics conceptual model for sustainable hotel revenue and asset management. RAISE-FER: a massive cross-dataset augmented facial expression dataset. Transforming customer experience in social robotics through explainable and interpretable artificial intelligence over a decade. When AI takes the wheel: AI-defined vehicles principles and pitfalls. Effects of praise from a social robot on task persistence in 18- to 24-month-old children.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1