The Efficacy of Upper Extremity Neuroma Surgery in Reducing Long-Term Opioid Use in Patients with Preoperative Opioid Use.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Journal of reconstructive microsurgery Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-07 DOI:10.1055/a-2576-0128
Emmanuel O Emovon Iii, Hannah Langdell, Elliott Rebello, J Alex Albright, Ethan Ong, Daniel Y Joh, Suhail K Mithani, Neill Y Li
{"title":"The Efficacy of Upper Extremity Neuroma Surgery in Reducing Long-Term Opioid Use in Patients with Preoperative Opioid Use.","authors":"Emmanuel O Emovon Iii, Hannah Langdell, Elliott Rebello, J Alex Albright, Ethan Ong, Daniel Y Joh, Suhail K Mithani, Neill Y Li","doi":"10.1055/a-2576-0128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Neuromas can cause severe neuropathic pain, leading to functional decline and psychosocial distress. For pain relief, patients refractory to medications for neuropathic pain may be prescribed opioids; however, such use has been shown to have unfortunate adverse effects. With increasing awareness and diagnostic capabilities for neuroma formation, this study evaluates whether upper extremity neuroma excision may reduce opioid use and if adjunctive nerve procedures further reduce opioid use.The PearlDiver database was queried for patients undergoing upper extremity neuroma excision surgery from 2010 to 2020. Patients with opioid prescription fill records preoperatively were extracted and stratified by an operative technique involving either (1) excision alone, (2) nerve implantation into bone or muscle, or (3) nerve reconstruction. Records were then assessed at 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively to assess for opioid use. Prescription fill rates at 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively were then assessed across techniques.Of the 14,330 patients that underwent upper extremity neuroma excision, 4,156 filled opioids preoperatively. Excision led to significant reductions in opioid prescription fill rates postoperatively, decreasing to 67.4% at 1 month and to 57.5% by 6 months (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Excision alone resulted in lower opioid use compared with excision with implantation at all postoperative time points (<i>p</i> < 0.05). At 6 months, opioid use was also significantly less following excision with nerve reconstruction compared with implantation (56.4% vs. 65.6%, <i>p</i> = 0.0096). There were no differences between excision alone and excision with nerve reconstruction.Neuroma excision significantly reduces opioid use in patients with preoperative opioid use while adjunctive operative techniques did not potentiate opioid reduction. This highlights the importance of understanding patient complaints, neuroma localization, and candidacy for excision as an effective measure for addressing opioid use in patients with preoperative opioid dependence.</p>","PeriodicalId":16949,"journal":{"name":"Journal of reconstructive microsurgery","volume":" ","pages":"124-131"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of reconstructive microsurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2576-0128","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Neuromas can cause severe neuropathic pain, leading to functional decline and psychosocial distress. For pain relief, patients refractory to medications for neuropathic pain may be prescribed opioids; however, such use has been shown to have unfortunate adverse effects. With increasing awareness and diagnostic capabilities for neuroma formation, this study evaluates whether upper extremity neuroma excision may reduce opioid use and if adjunctive nerve procedures further reduce opioid use.The PearlDiver database was queried for patients undergoing upper extremity neuroma excision surgery from 2010 to 2020. Patients with opioid prescription fill records preoperatively were extracted and stratified by an operative technique involving either (1) excision alone, (2) nerve implantation into bone or muscle, or (3) nerve reconstruction. Records were then assessed at 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively to assess for opioid use. Prescription fill rates at 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively were then assessed across techniques.Of the 14,330 patients that underwent upper extremity neuroma excision, 4,156 filled opioids preoperatively. Excision led to significant reductions in opioid prescription fill rates postoperatively, decreasing to 67.4% at 1 month and to 57.5% by 6 months (p < 0.001). Excision alone resulted in lower opioid use compared with excision with implantation at all postoperative time points (p < 0.05). At 6 months, opioid use was also significantly less following excision with nerve reconstruction compared with implantation (56.4% vs. 65.6%, p = 0.0096). There were no differences between excision alone and excision with nerve reconstruction.Neuroma excision significantly reduces opioid use in patients with preoperative opioid use while adjunctive operative techniques did not potentiate opioid reduction. This highlights the importance of understanding patient complaints, neuroma localization, and candidacy for excision as an effective measure for addressing opioid use in patients with preoperative opioid dependence.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
上肢神经瘤手术对减少术前使用阿片类药物的患者长期使用阿片类药物的效果。
背景:神经瘤可引起严重的神经病理性疼痛,导致功能衰退和社会心理压力。为了缓解疼痛,对治疗神经病理性疼痛的药物难治的患者可能会被处方阿片类药物;然而,这种药物的使用已被证明会产生不幸的不良影响。随着对神经瘤形成的认识和诊断能力不断提高,本研究评估了上肢神经瘤切除术是否可减少阿片类药物的使用,以及辅助神经手术是否可进一步减少阿片类药物的使用:方法: 查询 PearlDiver 数据库,了解 2010-2020 年间接受上肢神经瘤切除手术的患者情况。提取术前有阿片类药物处方填写记录的患者,并按照手术技术进行分层:1)单纯切除术;2)神经植入骨或肌肉;3)神经重建术。然后评估术后 1、3 和 6 个月的记录,以评估阿片类药物的使用情况。然后评估不同技术术后 1、3 和 6 个月的处方填充率:结果:在接受上肢神经瘤切除术的 14,330 名患者中,有 4,156 人术前服用了阿片类药物。切除术大大降低了术后阿片类药物处方的使用率,1 个月时为 67.4%,6 个月时降至 57.5%(p 结论:神经瘤切除术大大降低了术后阿片类药物处方的使用率,1 个月时为 67.4%,6 个月时降至 57.5%:神经瘤切除术能明显减少术前使用阿片类药物的患者的阿片类药物使用量,而辅助手术技术并不能有效减少阿片类药物的使用量。这凸显了了解患者主诉、神经瘤定位和是否适合切除的重要性,是解决术前阿片类药物依赖患者阿片类药物使用问题的有效措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
28.60%
发文量
80
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery is a peer-reviewed, indexed journal that provides an international forum for the publication of articles focusing on reconstructive microsurgery and complex reconstructive surgery. The journal was originally established in 1984 for the microsurgical community to publish and share academic papers. The Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery provides the latest in original research spanning basic laboratory, translational, and clinical investigations. Review papers cover current topics in complex reconstruction and microsurgery. In addition, special sections discuss new technologies, innovations, materials, and significant problem cases. The journal welcomes controversial topics, editorial comments, book reviews, and letters to the Editor, in order to complete the balanced spectrum of information available in the Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery. All articles undergo stringent peer review by international experts in the specialty.
期刊最新文献
Have Outcomes Improved in Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction? An 8-Year Prospective Longitudinal Study of 5,671 Flaps Across 22 Centers. Anterolateral Thigh Versus Parascapular Fasciocutaneous Free Flap Donor Site Morbidity: A Systematic Review. When Coverage Isn't Enough: The Sociodemographic Impact on Weight-Bearing Progression After Flap Reconstruction for Lower Extremity Open Fractures. Correspondence on: Effect of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery on Racial Inequalities in Prescribing Practices for Autologous Breast Reconstruction. Influence of Body Mass Index on Perioperative Outcomes of Oncologic Head and Neck Free Flaps: Comprehensive Analysis Using a Prospective Institutional Database.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1