Ototoxicity Monitoring: The Evolution of a Protocol for Head and Neck Cancer Patients.

IF 1.8 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY OTO Open Pub Date : 2025-04-07 eCollection Date: 2025-04-01 DOI:10.1002/oto2.70070
Jena Patel, Jacob Beiriger, Kalena Liu, Zach Urdang, Julia Croce, Molly Wolfson, Jacob Hulswit, Olivia Giglio, Jacob B Hunter, Irina Middleton
{"title":"Ototoxicity Monitoring: The Evolution of a Protocol for Head and Neck Cancer Patients.","authors":"Jena Patel, Jacob Beiriger, Kalena Liu, Zach Urdang, Julia Croce, Molly Wolfson, Jacob Hulswit, Olivia Giglio, Jacob B Hunter, Irina Middleton","doi":"10.1002/oto2.70070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We evaluated an ototoxicity monitoring program (OMP) for improving audiologic follow-up in head and neck cancer (HNC) patients.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Tertiary academic center.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two hundred and forty patients were recommended for chemotherapy between January 2017 and June 2022. An OMP was implemented in March 2021; every patient received an audiology referral and was contacted to schedule a pretreatment audiogram. Patients were divided into pre-OMP and post-OMP cohorts. Main outcome measures included rates of pretreatment audiograms, posttreatment audiograms, posttreatment otologic symptoms, and hearing aid utilization.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 131 patients evaluated pre-OMP and 109 evaluated post-OMP. The mean age for all patients was 62.8 ± 11.9 years; 76.3% were male. After the implementation of the OMP, a significantly higher proportion of patients received a pretreatment audiogram (66.1% vs 34.4%, <i>P</i> < .001), with enrolled patients being 3.8 times more likely to obtain 1 (95% confidence interval: 2.2-6.6), <i>P</i> < .001). There was a significant increase in reported otologic symptoms after implementing the program (18% vs 36%, <i>P</i> = .002). However, the rate of hearing aid utilization decreased after OMP implementation (pre-OMP: 33% vs post-OMP: 13%, <i>P</i> = .02).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Implementation of an OMP significantly improved the proportion of HNC patients that underwent pretreatment audiograms prior to systemic therapy; however, audiologic follow-up remained largely unchanged in the posttreatment period.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level 4.</p>","PeriodicalId":19697,"journal":{"name":"OTO Open","volume":"9 2","pages":"e70070"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11973582/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"OTO Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/oto2.70070","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: We evaluated an ototoxicity monitoring program (OMP) for improving audiologic follow-up in head and neck cancer (HNC) patients.

Study design: Retrospective cohort study.

Setting: Tertiary academic center.

Methods: Two hundred and forty patients were recommended for chemotherapy between January 2017 and June 2022. An OMP was implemented in March 2021; every patient received an audiology referral and was contacted to schedule a pretreatment audiogram. Patients were divided into pre-OMP and post-OMP cohorts. Main outcome measures included rates of pretreatment audiograms, posttreatment audiograms, posttreatment otologic symptoms, and hearing aid utilization.

Results: There were 131 patients evaluated pre-OMP and 109 evaluated post-OMP. The mean age for all patients was 62.8 ± 11.9 years; 76.3% were male. After the implementation of the OMP, a significantly higher proportion of patients received a pretreatment audiogram (66.1% vs 34.4%, P < .001), with enrolled patients being 3.8 times more likely to obtain 1 (95% confidence interval: 2.2-6.6), P < .001). There was a significant increase in reported otologic symptoms after implementing the program (18% vs 36%, P = .002). However, the rate of hearing aid utilization decreased after OMP implementation (pre-OMP: 33% vs post-OMP: 13%, P = .02).

Conclusion: Implementation of an OMP significantly improved the proportion of HNC patients that underwent pretreatment audiograms prior to systemic therapy; however, audiologic follow-up remained largely unchanged in the posttreatment period.

Level of evidence: Level 4.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
耳毒性监测:头颈癌患者方案的演变。
目的:评价耳毒性监测方案(OMP)对头颈癌(HNC)患者听力学随访的改善作用。研究设计:回顾性队列研究。环境:高等教育学术中心。方法:2017年1月至2022年6月,推荐240例患者进行化疗。OMP于2021年3月实施;每位患者接受听力学转诊,并联系安排预处理听力图。患者被分为omp前组和omp后组。主要结局指标包括治疗前听力图率、治疗后听力图率、治疗后耳科症状率和助听器使用率。结果:131例患者接受omp前评估,109例患者接受omp后评估。所有患者的平均年龄为62.8±11.9岁;76.3%为男性。实施OMP后,接受预处理听像图的患者比例显著增加(66.1% vs 34.4%, P P P = 0.002)。然而,实施OMP后助听器使用率下降(OMP前:33% vs OMP后:13%,P = 0.02)。结论:OMP的实施显著提高了HNC患者在全身治疗前接受预处理听力图的比例;然而,听力学随访在治疗后期间基本保持不变。证据等级:四级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
OTO Open
OTO Open Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
115
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Ergonomic Trends in Endoscopic Skull-Base Surgeons: A Survey to the North American Skull Base Society. Fine-Needle Aspiration Versus Core Needle Biopsy for Malignant Cervical Lymphadenopathy: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review. Intranasal Oxymetazoline and Xylometazoline Use in Patients With Deviated Nasal Septum: A Cross-Sectional Telephone Survey. Technique for Difficult Wharton's Duct Cannulation. Radioanatomy of the Silent Sinus Syndrome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1