Neighborhood opportunity and response to psychotherapy in anxious youth

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Psychiatry Research Pub Date : 2025-04-01 DOI:10.1016/j.psychres.2025.116484
Chase Antonacci , André Zugman , Isaac Morales , Elise M. Cardinale , Samuel E.C. Frank , Krystal M. Lewis , Erin Berman , Ian H. Gotlib , Daniel S. Pine
{"title":"Neighborhood opportunity and response to psychotherapy in anxious youth","authors":"Chase Antonacci ,&nbsp;André Zugman ,&nbsp;Isaac Morales ,&nbsp;Elise M. Cardinale ,&nbsp;Samuel E.C. Frank ,&nbsp;Krystal M. Lewis ,&nbsp;Erin Berman ,&nbsp;Ian H. Gotlib ,&nbsp;Daniel S. Pine","doi":"10.1016/j.psychres.2025.116484","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Early adversity is a well-documented risk factor for anxiety disorders in youth; few studies, however, have examined how exposure to adversity influences treatment outcomes. Emerging research suggests that systemic inequities can affect the efficacy of frontline psychotherapies. The effects of structural disadvantage and, in particular, neighborhood-level features on treatment outcomes for pediatric anxiety are largely under-studied. The current study aimed to examine the impact of neighborhood opportunity on children's response to cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT). A total of 202 youth aged 8–17 years (M<sub>age</sub> = 12.030, 56 % F) with a diagnosed anxiety disorder completed 8–12 weeks of exposure-based CBT. Neighborhood disadvantage was quantified using the Child Opportunity Index (COI), and treatment response was measured via the Pediatric Anxiety Rating Scale (PARS) at baseline, post-treatment, and a 6-month follow-up assessment. Following treatment, anxious youth exhibited a significant 31.523 % reduction in symptoms. Across all scoring dimensions of the COI (socioeconomic, education, and health &amp; environment), neighborhood disadvantage did not reliably predict treatment response. These findings suggest that when provided access to high-quality, evidence-based psychotherapy, youth from lower opportunity neighborhoods achieve comparable outcomes to their more advantaged peers. Taken together with prior research, this study suggests that structural disadvantage at the neighborhood level is not a robust predictor of treatment outcomes in the context of pediatric anxiety. These findings raise the possibility that equitable access to treatment could, in certain circumstances, mitigate the negative effects of systemic neighborhood-level inequities on mental health outcomes, underscoring the importance of expanding the availability of treatment services.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20819,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatry Research","volume":"348 ","pages":"Article 116484"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatry Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165178125001325","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Early adversity is a well-documented risk factor for anxiety disorders in youth; few studies, however, have examined how exposure to adversity influences treatment outcomes. Emerging research suggests that systemic inequities can affect the efficacy of frontline psychotherapies. The effects of structural disadvantage and, in particular, neighborhood-level features on treatment outcomes for pediatric anxiety are largely under-studied. The current study aimed to examine the impact of neighborhood opportunity on children's response to cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT). A total of 202 youth aged 8–17 years (Mage = 12.030, 56 % F) with a diagnosed anxiety disorder completed 8–12 weeks of exposure-based CBT. Neighborhood disadvantage was quantified using the Child Opportunity Index (COI), and treatment response was measured via the Pediatric Anxiety Rating Scale (PARS) at baseline, post-treatment, and a 6-month follow-up assessment. Following treatment, anxious youth exhibited a significant 31.523 % reduction in symptoms. Across all scoring dimensions of the COI (socioeconomic, education, and health & environment), neighborhood disadvantage did not reliably predict treatment response. These findings suggest that when provided access to high-quality, evidence-based psychotherapy, youth from lower opportunity neighborhoods achieve comparable outcomes to their more advantaged peers. Taken together with prior research, this study suggests that structural disadvantage at the neighborhood level is not a robust predictor of treatment outcomes in the context of pediatric anxiety. These findings raise the possibility that equitable access to treatment could, in certain circumstances, mitigate the negative effects of systemic neighborhood-level inequities on mental health outcomes, underscoring the importance of expanding the availability of treatment services.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
焦虑青少年的邻里机会和对心理治疗的反应。
早期逆境是青少年焦虑症的一个有充分证据的风险因素;然而,很少有研究调查逆境暴露如何影响治疗结果。新兴研究表明,系统性的不平等会影响一线心理疗法的疗效。结构劣势的影响,特别是邻里水平的特征对儿童焦虑治疗结果的影响在很大程度上还没有得到充分的研究。本研究旨在探讨邻里机会对儿童对认知行为治疗(CBT)反应的影响。共有202名年龄在8-17岁(Mage = 12.030, 56% F)被诊断为焦虑症的青少年完成了8-12周的基于暴露的CBT治疗。使用儿童机会指数(COI)量化邻里劣势,并通过儿童焦虑评定量表(PARS)在基线、治疗后和6个月的随访评估中测量治疗反应。治疗后,焦虑青年的症状显著减少了31.523%。在COI的所有评分维度(社会经济、教育和健康与环境)中,社区劣势不能可靠地预测治疗反应。这些发现表明,当提供高质量的、基于证据的心理治疗时,来自机会较低社区的青少年与条件较好的同龄人取得了相当的结果。结合先前的研究,本研究表明,在儿童焦虑的背景下,邻里水平的结构性劣势并不是治疗结果的有力预测因素。这些发现提出了这样一种可能性,即在某些情况下,公平获得治疗可以减轻系统性社区一级不平等对精神卫生结果的负面影响,强调了扩大治疗服务可得性的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Psychiatry Research
Psychiatry Research 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
17.40
自引率
1.80%
发文量
527
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: Psychiatry Research offers swift publication of comprehensive research reports and reviews within the field of psychiatry. The scope of the journal encompasses: Biochemical, physiological, neuroanatomic, genetic, neurocognitive, and psychosocial determinants of psychiatric disorders. Diagnostic assessments of psychiatric disorders. Evaluations that pursue hypotheses about the cause or causes of psychiatric diseases. Evaluations of pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic psychiatric treatments. Basic neuroscience studies related to animal or neurochemical models for psychiatric disorders. Methodological advances, such as instrumentation, clinical scales, and assays directly applicable to psychiatric research.
期刊最新文献
Understanding the roots of suicide in veterinarians to inform prevention: A scoping review Clinical correlates of individuals with and without misophonia in the U.S.: Results from a population-based study Suicide ideation, suicide risk, and firearm storage practices and attitudes among U.S. uniformed law enforcement officers’ Editorial Board Agitation and anxiety features define a more severe phenotype in unipolar depression
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1