Operative Microscope In-Field Visualization of Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy Interface (Zeiss CONVIVO®).

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Operative Neurosurgery Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-07 DOI:10.1227/ons.0000000000001560
Giovanni Muscas, Eleonora Visocchi, Alberto Parenti, Federico Capelli, Mirko Petti, Alice Esposito, Enrico Fainardi, Isacco Desideri, Lorenzo Livi, Alessandro Della Puppa
{"title":"Operative Microscope In-Field Visualization of Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy Interface (Zeiss CONVIVO®).","authors":"Giovanni Muscas, Eleonora Visocchi, Alberto Parenti, Federico Capelli, Mirko Petti, Alice Esposito, Enrico Fainardi, Isacco Desideri, Lorenzo Livi, Alessandro Della Puppa","doi":"10.1227/ons.0000000000001560","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Using confocal endomicroscopy (CLE) in neurosurgery holds the potential for intraoperative diagnosis and correct identification of tumor margins. Still, the correct employment of such a promising technique requires either an external dedicated person to interact with the neurosurgeon during the operation to check the quality of the acquired images or the operator to look directly and frequently outside of the operative field while maintaining the confocal microscopy probe in the surgical cave, thus interrupting the surgical flow, potentially disturbing the correct execution of surgical maneuvers and hindering a correct image acquisition.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To overcome this problem, we integrated the confocal microscopy interface (Zeiss CONVIVO®) into the surgical view through the operative microscope (Heads-up display). We enrolled patients undergoing surgery with the use of CLE for different pathologies, and we randomly allocated them to be operated with the heads-up display integration or without it. The mean CLE employment time and the number of usable and nonusable captures were annotated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-two patients were enrolled of which 12 patients underwent the procedure without the heads-up integration (54.5%) and 10 (45.5%) with it. The mean usage time of the CONVIVO® was 137 (±134) seconds, 61.1 (±38) seconds for the heads-up display group, and 201.6 (±154.1) seconds for the non-heads-up display group ( P = .01). The heads-up display group showed a higher proportion of usable images (11 [±4] vs 50 [±37], 21.7%) than the non-heads-up display group (30 [±21] vs 163 [±33], 18.4%), although nonsignificant ( P = .06). A significant influence of the intraoperative visualization on overall employment of CLE and a reduced number of images collected (611 vs 2139; P = .007).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>By allowing the operator to check the quality of the images directly while still looking inside the operating field, better-quality images and a reduced number of unemployable captures are obtained, resulting in more efficient and less time-consuming use of intraoperative confocal microscopy, ultimately leading to reduced operative length.</p>","PeriodicalId":54254,"journal":{"name":"Operative Neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"860-864"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Operative Neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1227/ons.0000000000001560","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Using confocal endomicroscopy (CLE) in neurosurgery holds the potential for intraoperative diagnosis and correct identification of tumor margins. Still, the correct employment of such a promising technique requires either an external dedicated person to interact with the neurosurgeon during the operation to check the quality of the acquired images or the operator to look directly and frequently outside of the operative field while maintaining the confocal microscopy probe in the surgical cave, thus interrupting the surgical flow, potentially disturbing the correct execution of surgical maneuvers and hindering a correct image acquisition.

Methods: To overcome this problem, we integrated the confocal microscopy interface (Zeiss CONVIVO®) into the surgical view through the operative microscope (Heads-up display). We enrolled patients undergoing surgery with the use of CLE for different pathologies, and we randomly allocated them to be operated with the heads-up display integration or without it. The mean CLE employment time and the number of usable and nonusable captures were annotated.

Results: Twenty-two patients were enrolled of which 12 patients underwent the procedure without the heads-up integration (54.5%) and 10 (45.5%) with it. The mean usage time of the CONVIVO® was 137 (±134) seconds, 61.1 (±38) seconds for the heads-up display group, and 201.6 (±154.1) seconds for the non-heads-up display group ( P = .01). The heads-up display group showed a higher proportion of usable images (11 [±4] vs 50 [±37], 21.7%) than the non-heads-up display group (30 [±21] vs 163 [±33], 18.4%), although nonsignificant ( P = .06). A significant influence of the intraoperative visualization on overall employment of CLE and a reduced number of images collected (611 vs 2139; P = .007).

Conclusion: By allowing the operator to check the quality of the images directly while still looking inside the operating field, better-quality images and a reduced number of unemployable captures are obtained, resulting in more efficient and less time-consuming use of intraoperative confocal microscopy, ultimately leading to reduced operative length.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
共聚焦激光内镜界面的手术显微镜场内可视化(蔡司CONVIVO®)。
背景和目的:在神经外科手术中使用共聚焦内镜(CLE)具有术中诊断和正确识别肿瘤边缘的潜力。然而,正确使用这种有前途的技术需要外部专门人员在手术过程中与神经外科医生互动,以检查所获取图像的质量,或者操作员在将共聚焦显微镜探头保持在手术腔内的同时,直接并频繁地观察手术视野外,从而中断手术流程,可能干扰手术操作的正确执行并阻碍正确的图像获取。方法:为了克服这一问题,我们通过手术显微镜(平视显示)将共聚焦显微镜界面(蔡司CONVIVO®)集成到手术视图中。我们招募了因不同病理而使用CLE进行手术的患者,我们随机分配他们进行整合抬头显示或不整合抬头显示的手术。对平均CLE使用时间和可用和不可使用捕获的数量进行了注释。结果:共纳入22例患者,其中12例(54.5%)行无抬头整合术,10例(45.5%)行抬头整合术。CONVIVO®的平均使用时间为137(±134)秒,平视组为61.1(±38)秒,非平视组为201.6(±154.1)秒(P = 0.01)。平视显示器组显示的可用图像比例(11[±4]比50[±37],21.7%)高于非平视显示器组(30[±21]比163[±33],18.4%),尽管无统计学意义(P = 0.06)。术中可视化对CLE整体使用的显著影响和收集图像数量的减少(611 vs 2139;P = .007)。结论:通过允许操作者在直视手术视野的同时直接检查图像质量,可以获得更好的图像质量,减少不可使用的捕获次数,从而提高术中共聚焦显微镜的使用效率,减少使用时间,最终缩短手术时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Operative Neurosurgery
Operative Neurosurgery Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
13.00%
发文量
530
期刊介绍: Operative Neurosurgery is a bi-monthly, unique publication focusing exclusively on surgical technique and devices, providing practical, skill-enhancing guidance to its readers. Complementing the clinical and research studies published in Neurosurgery, Operative Neurosurgery brings the reader technical material that highlights operative procedures, anatomy, instrumentation, devices, and technology. Operative Neurosurgery is the practical resource for cutting-edge material that brings the surgeon the most up to date literature on operative practice and technique
期刊最新文献
Anterior Temporal and Transcavernous Approach for Clipping of an Anterior Inferior Cerebellar Artery Aneurysm: 2-Dimensional Operative Video. Applicability of a Dexterity-Enhancing Handheld Robot for 360° Endoscopic Skull Base Approaches: An Exploratory Cadaver Study. Simulation of a Remote Robotic Endovascular Thrombectomy. Recurrent Large Vessel Occlusion After Successful Recanalization From Mechanical Thrombectomy: Risk Factors and Outcomes After Repeat Mechanical Thrombectomy. A Comparative Study of Traditional and Synchronous Video Lateral Spread Response Monitoring in Predicting Long-Term Hemifacial Spasm Relief After Microvascular Decompression Surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1