What does the American public want to know about addiction? A national systematic qualitative investigation.

IF 2.7 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Psychology of Addictive Behaviors Pub Date : 2025-04-07 DOI:10.1037/adb0001066
John F Kelly, Hazel Simpson
{"title":"What does the American public want to know about addiction? A national systematic qualitative investigation.","authors":"John F Kelly, Hazel Simpson","doi":"10.1037/adb0001066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>In addiction-focused clinical and public health communications intended to educate the public, assumptions are made regarding in which specific knowledge aspects the target population is deficient, so these can be emphasized and harms minimized. It is rare, however, that outreach campaign messaging is based on specific known knowledge deficits. This lack of information can lead to prevention and intervention messaging that not only fails to gain target audiences' attention but can produce unintended consequences. Greater knowledge about information deficits could enhance the impact of addiction-specific health campaigns.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Cross-sectional investigation involving members of the public (<i>N</i> = 1,257) sampled via the Prolific platform. Participants listed their top 10 questions pertaining to one of six different types of addiction problems (addiction-general [<i>n</i> = 211], alcohol [<i>n</i> = 209], cannabis [<i>n</i> = 209], cocaine [<i>n</i> = 211], opioids [<i>n</i> = 214], gambling [<i>n</i> = 209]). Results were categorized using qualitative thematic and grounded theory and ranked according to proportional frequency.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Types of questions asked fell into nine domains (e.g., etiology, clinical characterization and course, drug characteristics, pharmacology) and subdomains, with topics varying substantially within addiction type (e.g., cannabis, opioids) across domains (e.g., etiology, treatment), as well as within domains across types. Differences in the proportion of types of questions asked across and within domains were highly variable differing across addiction types (i.e., cannabis, opioids, gambling).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings have implications for clinical and public health campaigns helping to highlight more precisely the exact nature and extent of potential population-level knowledge deficits across specific addiction types. These might be prioritized and targeted in knowledge dissemination efforts for prevention and treatment engagement. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48325,"journal":{"name":"Psychology of Addictive Behaviors","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12353419/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology of Addictive Behaviors","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/adb0001066","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: In addiction-focused clinical and public health communications intended to educate the public, assumptions are made regarding in which specific knowledge aspects the target population is deficient, so these can be emphasized and harms minimized. It is rare, however, that outreach campaign messaging is based on specific known knowledge deficits. This lack of information can lead to prevention and intervention messaging that not only fails to gain target audiences' attention but can produce unintended consequences. Greater knowledge about information deficits could enhance the impact of addiction-specific health campaigns.

Method: Cross-sectional investigation involving members of the public (N = 1,257) sampled via the Prolific platform. Participants listed their top 10 questions pertaining to one of six different types of addiction problems (addiction-general [n = 211], alcohol [n = 209], cannabis [n = 209], cocaine [n = 211], opioids [n = 214], gambling [n = 209]). Results were categorized using qualitative thematic and grounded theory and ranked according to proportional frequency.

Results: Types of questions asked fell into nine domains (e.g., etiology, clinical characterization and course, drug characteristics, pharmacology) and subdomains, with topics varying substantially within addiction type (e.g., cannabis, opioids) across domains (e.g., etiology, treatment), as well as within domains across types. Differences in the proportion of types of questions asked across and within domains were highly variable differing across addiction types (i.e., cannabis, opioids, gambling).

Conclusions: Findings have implications for clinical and public health campaigns helping to highlight more precisely the exact nature and extent of potential population-level knowledge deficits across specific addiction types. These might be prioritized and targeted in knowledge dissemination efforts for prevention and treatment engagement. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关于上瘾,美国公众想知道些什么?一项全国性的系统定性调查。
目的:在旨在教育公众的以成瘾为重点的临床和公共卫生传播中,对目标人群缺乏的特定知识方面进行了假设,因此可以强调这些知识并将危害降到最低。然而,很少有宣传活动的信息是基于特定的已知知识缺陷。这种信息的缺乏可能导致预防和干预信息传递不仅不能引起目标受众的注意,而且可能产生意想不到的后果。更多地了解信息缺失可以加强针对成瘾的健康运动的影响。方法:通过高产平台对1257名市民进行横断面调查。参与者列出了与六种不同类型的成瘾问题(一般成瘾[n = 211]、酒精成瘾[n = 209]、大麻成瘾[n = 209]、可卡因成瘾[n = 211]、阿片类药物成瘾[n = 214]、赌博成瘾[n = 209])中的一种相关的十大问题。采用定性的主题理论和扎根理论对结果进行分类,并根据比例频率进行排序。结果:所问问题的类型分为九个领域(如病因、临床特征和过程、药物特征、药理学)和子领域,主题在成瘾类型(如大麻、阿片类药物)、领域(如病因、治疗)以及不同类型的领域内有很大差异。不同领域之间和领域内所问问题类型的比例差异很大,因成瘾类型(即大麻、阿片类药物、赌博)而异。结论:研究结果对临床和公共卫生运动具有重要意义,有助于更准确地强调特定成瘾类型中潜在的人口水平知识缺陷的确切性质和程度。在预防和治疗参与的知识传播工作中,这些可能是优先考虑和有针对性的。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
11.80%
发文量
165
期刊介绍: Psychology of Addictive Behaviors publishes peer-reviewed original articles related to the psychological aspects of addictive behaviors. The journal includes articles on the following topics: - alcohol and alcoholism - drug use and abuse - eating disorders - smoking and nicotine addiction, and other excessive behaviors (e.g., gambling) Full-length research reports, literature reviews, brief reports, and comments are published.
期刊最新文献
Compulsivity and impulse control in behavioral addictions: A bibliometric and conceptual analysis of global research trends, thematic gaps, and future directions. Effects of daily discrimination and microaggressions on alcohol use and related consequences among Latine college students at a predominantly White institution. Drinking motives and alcohol's acute effects in a social laboratory setting. Alcohol and emotion: Analyzing convergence between facially expressed and self-reported indices of emotion under alcohol intoxication. Integrating the Confluence Model and I³ Model to predict sexual assault perpetration intentions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1