Disabling Neurologic Deficits and Antiplatelet Therapy in Acute Minor Stroke.

IF 5.3 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Journal of the American Heart Association Pub Date : 2025-04-15 Epub Date: 2025-04-07 DOI:10.1161/JAHA.122.029734
Chong Han, Ming Yang, Yuesong Pan, Hao Li, Liping Liu, Xia Meng, Yilong Wang, Yongjun Wang
{"title":"Disabling Neurologic Deficits and Antiplatelet Therapy in Acute Minor Stroke.","authors":"Chong Han, Ming Yang, Yuesong Pan, Hao Li, Liping Liu, Xia Meng, Yilong Wang, Yongjun Wang","doi":"10.1161/JAHA.122.029734","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to assess the clinical outcome among patients with minor stroke, both with and without disabling neurologic deficits (DNDs). It sought to investigate the efficacy of antiplatelet therapy using clopidogrel-aspirin versus aspirin alone within the framework of the CHANCE (Clopidogrel in High-Risk Patients With Acute Nondisabling Cerebrovascular Events) trial.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>We enrolled 3725 patients with minor stroke from the CHANCE trial. Patients were divided into 2 groups: those with DNDs and those without, based on the presence or absence of DND, as determined by the baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score. The interaction between the treatment effects of antiplatelet therapy in patients with or without DNDs was analyzed using the Cox proportional hazards regression model. Of all enrolled patients, 1918 (51.5%) had DNDs, and 1807 (48.5%) did not. Patients with DNDs exhibited a higher risk of stroke recurrence at 90 days compared with those without (11.9% versus 8.5%; <i>P</i>=0.008). Dual antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel and aspirin was associated with a reduced risk of recurrent stroke compared with the mono antiplatelet therapy in both patients with DND and patients without DNDs (adjusted hazard ratios, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.57-0.96] and 0.64 [95% CI, 0.46-0.88], respectively). There was no significant interaction between DNDs and antiplatelet therapy in reducing stroke recurrence (interaction <i>P</i>=0.634).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>DNDs appear to correlate with an elevated risk of recurrent stroke in patients with minor stroke. Dual antiplatelet therapy demonstrates superiority over aspirin alone in reducing the risk of subsequent stroke events within 90 days in patients, regardless of the presence of DNDs.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique Identifier: NCT00979589.</p>","PeriodicalId":54370,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Heart Association","volume":" ","pages":"e029734"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12132881/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Heart Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.122.029734","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to assess the clinical outcome among patients with minor stroke, both with and without disabling neurologic deficits (DNDs). It sought to investigate the efficacy of antiplatelet therapy using clopidogrel-aspirin versus aspirin alone within the framework of the CHANCE (Clopidogrel in High-Risk Patients With Acute Nondisabling Cerebrovascular Events) trial.

Methods and results: We enrolled 3725 patients with minor stroke from the CHANCE trial. Patients were divided into 2 groups: those with DNDs and those without, based on the presence or absence of DND, as determined by the baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score. The interaction between the treatment effects of antiplatelet therapy in patients with or without DNDs was analyzed using the Cox proportional hazards regression model. Of all enrolled patients, 1918 (51.5%) had DNDs, and 1807 (48.5%) did not. Patients with DNDs exhibited a higher risk of stroke recurrence at 90 days compared with those without (11.9% versus 8.5%; P=0.008). Dual antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel and aspirin was associated with a reduced risk of recurrent stroke compared with the mono antiplatelet therapy in both patients with DND and patients without DNDs (adjusted hazard ratios, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.57-0.96] and 0.64 [95% CI, 0.46-0.88], respectively). There was no significant interaction between DNDs and antiplatelet therapy in reducing stroke recurrence (interaction P=0.634).

Conclusions: DNDs appear to correlate with an elevated risk of recurrent stroke in patients with minor stroke. Dual antiplatelet therapy demonstrates superiority over aspirin alone in reducing the risk of subsequent stroke events within 90 days in patients, regardless of the presence of DNDs.

Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique Identifier: NCT00979589.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
急性轻微脑卒中致残性神经功能缺损和抗血小板治疗。
背景:本研究旨在评估伴有和不伴有失能性神经功能缺损(dnd)的轻度脑卒中患者的临床结果。在CHANCE(氯吡格雷在高危急性非致残性脑血管事件患者中的应用)试验框架内,研究氯吡格雷-阿司匹林联合抗血小板治疗与阿司匹林单用抗血小板治疗的疗效。方法和结果:我们从CHANCE试验中招募了3725例轻度卒中患者。根据美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale)的基线评分,将患者分为两组:有DND的患者和没有DND的患者。采用Cox比例风险回归模型分析抗血小板治疗与非dnd患者治疗效果之间的相互作用。在所有入组患者中,1918人(51.5%)有DNDs, 1807人(48.5%)没有。与没有dnd的患者相比,dnd患者在90天卒中复发的风险更高(11.9%对8.5%;P = 0.008)。与单抗血小板治疗相比,氯吡格雷和阿司匹林双重抗血小板治疗在DND患者和无DND患者中均与卒中复发风险降低相关(校正风险比分别为0.74 [95% CI, 0.57-0.96]和0.64 [95% CI, 0.46-0.88])。dnd与抗血小板治疗在减少卒中复发方面无显著交互作用(交互作用P=0.634)。结论:dnd似乎与轻度卒中患者卒中复发风险升高相关。双重抗血小板治疗在降低患者90天内后续卒中事件的风险方面优于阿司匹林,无论是否存在dnd。注册:网址:https://www.clinicaltrials.gov;唯一标识符:NCT00979589。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the American Heart Association
Journal of the American Heart Association CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
1.90%
发文量
1749
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: As an Open Access journal, JAHA - Journal of the American Heart Association is rapidly and freely available, accelerating the translation of strong science into effective practice. JAHA is an authoritative, peer-reviewed Open Access journal focusing on cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease. JAHA provides a global forum for basic and clinical research and timely reviews on cardiovascular disease and stroke. As an Open Access journal, its content is free on publication to read, download, and share, accelerating the translation of strong science into effective practice.
期刊最新文献
Update on Education for Families and Patients With Pediatric Heart Disease: A Focus on Technological Advancements, Procedures, and Transitions of Care: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Predicting Recurrence and Outcomes After Stressor-Associated Atrial Fibrillation Using ECG-Based Deep Learning. Effect of 2 Weeks of Time-Restricted Eating on Innate Immunity and Systemic Inflammation in Patients With a History of Myocardial Infarction: A Randomized-Controlled Crossover Study. Prior Antiplatelet Exposure and Clinical Outcomes Among Korean Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction. Prognostic Impact of Elevated Pulmonary Vascular Resistance in Group 2 Pulmonary Hypertension: Insights From a Japanese Multicenter Registry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1