Strain- and vaccine-specific effects of serum antibodies in the protection of intestinal SARS-CoV-2 infection.

M D Cherne, D Snyder, B Sidar, K Blackwell, B Jenkins, S Huang, T A Sebrell, J F Hedges, J R Spence, C B Chang, J N Wilking, S T Walk, M A Jutila, E K Loveday, D Bimczok
{"title":"Strain- and vaccine-specific effects of serum antibodies in the protection of intestinal SARS-CoV-2 infection.","authors":"M D Cherne, D Snyder, B Sidar, K Blackwell, B Jenkins, S Huang, T A Sebrell, J F Hedges, J R Spence, C B Chang, J N Wilking, S T Walk, M A Jutila, E K Loveday, D Bimczok","doi":"10.1101/2025.03.24.25324570","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection remains a public health challenge worldwide. The gastrointestinal tract has emerged as an important site of infection and has been implicated as a reservoir for long-term infection, particularly for post-acute COVID-19 syndrome. However, whether vaccine-induced systemic antibodies can prevent intestinal infection with SARS-CoV-2 is unclear. Compared to Vero cells commonly used to assess SARS-CoV-2 neutralization, the intestinal epithelium has a functional interferon response and expresses higher levels of ACE2, enzymes, and antibody-binding Fc receptors that may impact SARS-CoV-2 immune elimination.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We evaluated the potential of antibodies from both naturally infected and vaccinated human subjects to inhibit SARS-CoV-2 infection of the intestinal epithelium. Serum samples were collected from human volunteers who had undergone natural infection with SARS-CoV-2 in 2020 (n=5) or who had received the Pfizer BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccine (n=13). Banked sera collected in 2016 served as negative controls (n=2). SARS-CoV-2 (WA01, Delta or Omicron) was pre-treated with sera and then used to infect iPSC-derived human intestinal organoids (HIO) or Caco-2 colonic epithelial cells, and SARS-CoV-2 infection was quantified by plaque assay, PCR, or immunofluorescence (IF) after 48-96 h.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both HIOs and Caco-2 cells supported robust infection with SARS-CoV-2. In HIOs, pretreatment of SARS-CoV-2 with a high titer post-vaccine serum completely blocked replication of WA01. Similarly, sera from both naturally infected donors collected in 2020 and sera from individuals who had received a BNT162b2 vaccine significantly inhibited replication of the WA01 strain in Caco-2 cells. In contrast, none of the sera significantly inhibited infection with the Delta variant of SARS-CoV-2. For Omicron, only sera from individuals who had received an Omicron-based vaccine significantly inhibited infection with SARS-CoV-2 in the plaque assay. Across all virus types, sera from individuals who had received Omicron-based BNT162b2 boosters were the most effective at reducing infection in Caco-2 cells.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results suggest that vaccine-induced antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 are protective in the gut. Our study also supports previous reports indicating that SARS-CoV-2 vaccines need to be adapted to circulating virus strains to convey full protection from infection.</p>","PeriodicalId":94281,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11974977/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.03.24.25324570","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection remains a public health challenge worldwide. The gastrointestinal tract has emerged as an important site of infection and has been implicated as a reservoir for long-term infection, particularly for post-acute COVID-19 syndrome. However, whether vaccine-induced systemic antibodies can prevent intestinal infection with SARS-CoV-2 is unclear. Compared to Vero cells commonly used to assess SARS-CoV-2 neutralization, the intestinal epithelium has a functional interferon response and expresses higher levels of ACE2, enzymes, and antibody-binding Fc receptors that may impact SARS-CoV-2 immune elimination.

Methods: We evaluated the potential of antibodies from both naturally infected and vaccinated human subjects to inhibit SARS-CoV-2 infection of the intestinal epithelium. Serum samples were collected from human volunteers who had undergone natural infection with SARS-CoV-2 in 2020 (n=5) or who had received the Pfizer BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccine (n=13). Banked sera collected in 2016 served as negative controls (n=2). SARS-CoV-2 (WA01, Delta or Omicron) was pre-treated with sera and then used to infect iPSC-derived human intestinal organoids (HIO) or Caco-2 colonic epithelial cells, and SARS-CoV-2 infection was quantified by plaque assay, PCR, or immunofluorescence (IF) after 48-96 h.

Results: Both HIOs and Caco-2 cells supported robust infection with SARS-CoV-2. In HIOs, pretreatment of SARS-CoV-2 with a high titer post-vaccine serum completely blocked replication of WA01. Similarly, sera from both naturally infected donors collected in 2020 and sera from individuals who had received a BNT162b2 vaccine significantly inhibited replication of the WA01 strain in Caco-2 cells. In contrast, none of the sera significantly inhibited infection with the Delta variant of SARS-CoV-2. For Omicron, only sera from individuals who had received an Omicron-based vaccine significantly inhibited infection with SARS-CoV-2 in the plaque assay. Across all virus types, sera from individuals who had received Omicron-based BNT162b2 boosters were the most effective at reducing infection in Caco-2 cells.

Conclusion: Our results suggest that vaccine-induced antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 are protective in the gut. Our study also supports previous reports indicating that SARS-CoV-2 vaccines need to be adapted to circulating virus strains to convey full protection from infection.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
血清抗体在保护肠道SARS-CoV-2感染中的菌株和疫苗特异性作用
背景:严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2 (SARS-CoV-2)感染仍然是全球公共卫生挑战。胃肠道已成为一个重要的感染部位,并被认为是长期感染的储存库,特别是急性后COVID-19综合征。然而,疫苗诱导的全身抗体是否能预防SARS-CoV-2肠道感染尚不清楚。与通常用于评估SARS-CoV-2中和的Vero细胞相比,肠上皮具有功能性干扰素应答,表达更高水平的ACE2、酶和抗体结合Fc受体,这可能影响SARS-CoV-2的免疫消除。方法:我们评估了自然感染和接种疫苗的人的抗体抑制肠道上皮SARS-CoV-2感染的潜力。收集了2020年自然感染SARS-CoV-2的人类志愿者(n=5)或接受辉瑞BNT162b2 COVID-19疫苗(n=13)的血清样本。2016年采集的血清作为阴性对照(n=2)。用血清对SARS-CoV-2 (WA01、Delta或Omicron)进行预处理,然后用于感染ipsc衍生的人肠道类器官(HIO)或Caco-2结肠上皮细胞,并在48-96 h后通过斑块测定、PCR或免疫荧光(IF)定量检测SARS-CoV-2感染情况。在HIOs中,用高滴度的疫苗后血清预处理SARS-CoV-2完全阻断了WA01的复制。同样,2020年收集的自然感染供者的血清和接受过BNT162b2疫苗的个体的血清均显著抑制了WA01菌株在Caco-2细胞中的复制。相比之下,没有一种血清能显著抑制SARS-CoV-2 δ变体的感染。对于Omicron,在空斑试验中,只有接受了基于Omicron的疫苗的个体的血清才能显著抑制SARS-CoV-2感染。在所有病毒类型中,接受了基于欧米克隆的BNT162b2增强剂的个体的血清在减少Caco-2细胞感染方面最有效。结论:我们的研究结果表明,疫苗诱导的SARS-CoV-2抗体反应对肠道具有保护作用。我们的研究还支持先前的报告,即SARS-CoV-2疫苗需要适应流行的病毒株,以提供全面的感染保护。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
US Overdose Mortality Saw First Drop Below the Jalal-Burke Exponential Growth Curve in 2024. Suicidal thoughts and behaviours in Cape Town: a cross-sectional study of prevalence, social, contextual, and clinical correlates. Melanocyte loss dominates the vitiligo transcriptome: a rank-based meta-analysis. Fatigue Links Sociodemographic Risk to Pain Intensity and Spread in Two Surgical Cohorts. The Neuroendocrine Profile During the Trier Social Stress Test in College Freshmen Offers Insights into the Emergence of Anxiety and Depression Symptoms.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1