[Epidural anesthesia in thoracic and abdominal surgery : Current perspectives and practical implications].

IF 1 Die Anaesthesiologie Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-07 DOI:10.1007/s00101-025-01528-3
Daniel M Pöpping, Wiebke Gogarten
{"title":"[Epidural anesthesia in thoracic and abdominal surgery : Current perspectives and practical implications].","authors":"Daniel M Pöpping, Wiebke Gogarten","doi":"10.1007/s00101-025-01528-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>With the rise of minimally invasive and robot-assisted surgical techniques, the role of epidural anesthesia (EA) in modern practice necessitates careful re-evaluation. This review explores the relevance of EA in thoracic and abdominal surgery, examining its practical applications, residual indications and considerations for its use. Additionally, alternative pain management strategies, including systemic analgesia, regional nerve blocks and novel perioperative approaches, are assessed for advantages and limitations compared to EA.Traditionally the gold standard for perioperative pain control in thoracic and abdominal procedures, EA provides superior analgesia, reduced pulmonary complications and promotes early postoperative mobilization; however, the shift towards less invasive types of surgery has raised questions about the necessity and risk-benefit profile of EA. Complications such as hypotension, hematoma and rare neurological injuries emphasize the importance of thorough risk assessment.Emerging data show that alternative methods, such as transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks, paravertebral blocks and multimodal analgesia provide comparable efficacy in specific patient groups while often demonstrating a better safety profile. Nevertheless, EA remains essential in extensive thoracic surgery, complex abdominal resections and in patients with a high risk for severe postoperative pain or respiratory compromise. Combining EA with enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols has also shown promise in improving outcomes.In conclusion, while minimally invasive surgical techniques have transformed perioperative care, EA retains a critical role in selected indications. Individualized planning of anesthesia, weighing EA against evolving alternatives and tailored to surgical and patient-specific factors, is essential. This review highlights the integration of evidence-based strategies to optimize the role of EA in contemporary surgical treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":72805,"journal":{"name":"Die Anaesthesiologie","volume":" ","pages":"411-420"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Die Anaesthesiologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00101-025-01528-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With the rise of minimally invasive and robot-assisted surgical techniques, the role of epidural anesthesia (EA) in modern practice necessitates careful re-evaluation. This review explores the relevance of EA in thoracic and abdominal surgery, examining its practical applications, residual indications and considerations for its use. Additionally, alternative pain management strategies, including systemic analgesia, regional nerve blocks and novel perioperative approaches, are assessed for advantages and limitations compared to EA.Traditionally the gold standard for perioperative pain control in thoracic and abdominal procedures, EA provides superior analgesia, reduced pulmonary complications and promotes early postoperative mobilization; however, the shift towards less invasive types of surgery has raised questions about the necessity and risk-benefit profile of EA. Complications such as hypotension, hematoma and rare neurological injuries emphasize the importance of thorough risk assessment.Emerging data show that alternative methods, such as transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks, paravertebral blocks and multimodal analgesia provide comparable efficacy in specific patient groups while often demonstrating a better safety profile. Nevertheless, EA remains essential in extensive thoracic surgery, complex abdominal resections and in patients with a high risk for severe postoperative pain or respiratory compromise. Combining EA with enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols has also shown promise in improving outcomes.In conclusion, while minimally invasive surgical techniques have transformed perioperative care, EA retains a critical role in selected indications. Individualized planning of anesthesia, weighing EA against evolving alternatives and tailored to surgical and patient-specific factors, is essential. This review highlights the integration of evidence-based strategies to optimize the role of EA in contemporary surgical treatment.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[胸腹部手术中的硬膜外麻醉:当前视角和实际意义]。
随着微创和机器人辅助手术技术的兴起,硬膜外麻醉(EA)在现代实践中的作用需要仔细重新评估。这篇综述探讨了EA在胸腹外科手术中的相关性,检查了它的实际应用,残留适应症和使用的注意事项。此外,与EA相比,其他疼痛管理策略,包括全身镇痛、局部神经阻滞和新的围手术期入路,评估了其优点和局限性。传统上,EA是胸腹手术围手术期疼痛控制的金标准,它提供了优越的镇痛效果,减少了肺部并发症,促进了术后早期活动;然而,向低侵入性手术类型的转变引发了对EA必要性和风险-收益概况的质疑。低血压、血肿和罕见的神经损伤等并发症强调了彻底风险评估的重要性。新出现的数据显示,其他替代方法,如经腹面阻滞、椎旁阻滞和多模式镇痛,在特定患者群体中提供了相当的疗效,同时往往显示出更好的安全性。然而,在广泛的胸外科手术、复杂的腹部切除术以及术后严重疼痛或呼吸系统损伤的高风险患者中,EA仍然是必不可少的。结合EA和术后增强恢复(ERAS)方案也显示出改善预后的希望。总之,虽然微创手术技术已经改变了围手术期护理,但EA在选定的适应症中仍然发挥着关键作用。个性化的麻醉计划,权衡EA与不断发展的替代方案,并根据手术和患者的具体因素量身定制,是必不可少的。这篇综述强调了整合循证策略来优化EA在当代外科治疗中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[The new European Resuscitation Council (ERC) guidelines 2025-Overview of the most important changes; the first 3-5 min are decisive]. [Aerosol therapy in spontaneously breathing tracheostomized patients: an in vitro study]. [Perioperative blood management in Jehova's Witnesses]. [Early detection, better prevention: fields of action for reduction of iatrogenic tracheal injuries]. Erratum zu: Update 2025 der S3-Leitlinie: „Sepsis – Prävention, Diagnose, Therapie und Nachsorge“.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1