Sociocultural perceptions of suicide in Pakistan: A systematic review & qualitative evidence synthesis

IF 2.6 Q1 PSYCHIATRY SSM. Mental health Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-04 DOI:10.1016/j.ssmmh.2025.100433
Ahsan Mashhood , Gul Saeed , Fatima Sami
{"title":"Sociocultural perceptions of suicide in Pakistan: A systematic review & qualitative evidence synthesis","authors":"Ahsan Mashhood ,&nbsp;Gul Saeed ,&nbsp;Fatima Sami","doi":"10.1016/j.ssmmh.2025.100433","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Suicide remains a significant public health issue in Pakistan, where social stigma and religious prohibitions create formidable barriers to understanding and intervention. Despite its recent decriminalization, the broader socio-cultural perceptions of suicide remain largely unexplored. Guided by the socio-ecological framework, this qualitative evidence synthesis examines how non-terrorist suicide is perceived across individual, familial, community, and institutional layers in Pakistan. A systematic review was conducted of over six databases up until July 2024 (PsycINFO, PubMed, EBSCO, Web of Science, ProQuest Premium, SCOPUS) and pearling through grey literature (AKU eCommons, QAU repository, Google Scholar). A total of eight studies (out of 1923) met the inclusion criteria. Thematic analysis of qualitative literature identified five key dimensions shaping these perceptions. At the individual level, suicide is often attributed to supernatural influences, mental illness, or a lack of resilience; familial dynamics prioritize ‘izzat’ over individual well-being enforcing invisibility; gendered perceptions of shame and honour further restrict women's access to help; cultural and religious prohibitions, such as labeling suicide the “ultimate sin,” further amplify ostracism and inhibit discussions about mental health; structural neglect, characterized by inadequate resources and societal dismissal, perpetuates stigma and inhibits systemic change. These findings are contextualized within Pakistan's unique religo-legal and socio-cultural dynamics. Our policy recommendations include incorporating mental health education into school curricula, community-based initiatives to challenge harmful norms, and establishing accessible mental health services for local needs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74861,"journal":{"name":"SSM. Mental health","volume":"7 ","pages":"Article 100433"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SSM. Mental health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666560325000453","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Suicide remains a significant public health issue in Pakistan, where social stigma and religious prohibitions create formidable barriers to understanding and intervention. Despite its recent decriminalization, the broader socio-cultural perceptions of suicide remain largely unexplored. Guided by the socio-ecological framework, this qualitative evidence synthesis examines how non-terrorist suicide is perceived across individual, familial, community, and institutional layers in Pakistan. A systematic review was conducted of over six databases up until July 2024 (PsycINFO, PubMed, EBSCO, Web of Science, ProQuest Premium, SCOPUS) and pearling through grey literature (AKU eCommons, QAU repository, Google Scholar). A total of eight studies (out of 1923) met the inclusion criteria. Thematic analysis of qualitative literature identified five key dimensions shaping these perceptions. At the individual level, suicide is often attributed to supernatural influences, mental illness, or a lack of resilience; familial dynamics prioritize ‘izzat’ over individual well-being enforcing invisibility; gendered perceptions of shame and honour further restrict women's access to help; cultural and religious prohibitions, such as labeling suicide the “ultimate sin,” further amplify ostracism and inhibit discussions about mental health; structural neglect, characterized by inadequate resources and societal dismissal, perpetuates stigma and inhibits systemic change. These findings are contextualized within Pakistan's unique religo-legal and socio-cultural dynamics. Our policy recommendations include incorporating mental health education into school curricula, community-based initiatives to challenge harmful norms, and establishing accessible mental health services for local needs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
巴基斯坦自杀的社会文化观念:系统回顾和定性证据综合
在巴基斯坦,自杀仍然是一个重大的公共卫生问题,在那里,社会耻辱和宗教禁令为理解和干预造成了巨大障碍。尽管最近自杀合法化,但更广泛的社会文化对自杀的看法在很大程度上仍未被探索。在社会生态框架的指导下,这一定性证据综合研究了巴基斯坦个人、家庭、社区和机构层面如何看待非恐怖主义自杀。截至2024年7月,对6个数据库(PsycINFO、PubMed、EBSCO、Web of Science、ProQuest Premium、SCOPUS)进行了系统综述,并对灰色文献(AKU eCommons、QAU repository、b谷歌Scholar)进行了梳理。共有8项研究(出自1923年)符合纳入标准。定性文献的专题分析确定了塑造这些观念的五个关键维度。在个人层面上,自杀通常被归因于超自然的影响、精神疾病或缺乏适应力;家庭动力学优先考虑“izzat”,而不是个人福祉,强制隐形;对羞耻和荣誉的性别观念进一步限制了妇女获得帮助的机会;文化和宗教上的禁忌,比如把自杀贴上“终极罪”的标签,进一步放大了排斥,抑制了关于心理健康的讨论;以资源不足和社会排斥为特征的结构性忽视使污名永久化,阻碍了系统性变革。这些发现是在巴基斯坦独特的宗教法律和社会文化动态背景下进行的。我们的政策建议包括将心理健康教育纳入学校课程,以社区为基础的挑战有害规范的举措,以及为当地需求建立可获得的心理健康服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
SSM. Mental health
SSM. Mental health Social Psychology, Health
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
118 days
期刊最新文献
Stigma and suicidal thoughts and behaviors among Black American emerging adults Mapping the costs of mental health- and substance use-related grant cancellations Development of the INDIGO partnership knowledge exchange strategy Critical and underrecognized home visitor competencies: Indigenous knowledge, culture, and self-determination in early childhood service delivery Threats and humiliation at the workplace and mental health among environmental scientists - a cross-sectional study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1