Daratumumab, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone Versus Bortezomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone in Transplant-Ineligible Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis

IF 3.9 4区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY Hematological Oncology Pub Date : 2025-04-10 DOI:10.1002/hon.70061
Lucio N. Gordan, Rohan Medhekar, Alex Z. Fu, Mostafa Shokoohi, Abril Oliva Ramirez, Nicolle Bonar, Bao-Ngoc Nguyen, Michaela Spence, Rebecca McTavish, Tim Disher, Santosh Gautam, Niodita Gupta-Werner, Shuchita Kaila, Anjan J. Patel
{"title":"Daratumumab, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone Versus Bortezomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone in Transplant-Ineligible Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis","authors":"Lucio N. Gordan,&nbsp;Rohan Medhekar,&nbsp;Alex Z. Fu,&nbsp;Mostafa Shokoohi,&nbsp;Abril Oliva Ramirez,&nbsp;Nicolle Bonar,&nbsp;Bao-Ngoc Nguyen,&nbsp;Michaela Spence,&nbsp;Rebecca McTavish,&nbsp;Tim Disher,&nbsp;Santosh Gautam,&nbsp;Niodita Gupta-Werner,&nbsp;Shuchita Kaila,&nbsp;Anjan J. Patel","doi":"10.1002/hon.70061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Daratumumab in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone (DRd) and bortezomib in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone (VRd) are guideline-recommended preferred regimens for initial treatment of transplant-ineligible (TIE) patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM). This study aimed to systematically identify evidence on the clinical effectiveness of DRd and VRd as first-line treatments for patients with TIE NDMM and to conduct a meta-analysis. Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched from January 2019 to June 2023, along with key congresses from January 2018 to June 2023. Bibliographies of relevant systematic literature reviews (SLR) were hand-searched. Randomized controlled trials and appropriately adjusted non-randomized studies comparing DRd versus VRd as first-line treatment for TIE NDMM were included. Overall, five records from three unique studies were identified. The fixed-effects meta-analysis showed a lower risk of disease progression or death with DRd versus VRd using the naïve approach (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.60; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.46, 0.77) as well as with the adjusted approach, which accounted for both double counting (i.e., two studies shared one comparison) and variance inflation due to studies with moderate and high risk of bias (HR: 0.56; 95% CI: 0.39, 0.82). In the absence of clinical trials with head-to-head comparison of these treatment regimens, these results could help inform the selection of optimal first-line treatment for TIE NDMM patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":12882,"journal":{"name":"Hematological Oncology","volume":"43 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hon.70061","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hematological Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hon.70061","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Daratumumab in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone (DRd) and bortezomib in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone (VRd) are guideline-recommended preferred regimens for initial treatment of transplant-ineligible (TIE) patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM). This study aimed to systematically identify evidence on the clinical effectiveness of DRd and VRd as first-line treatments for patients with TIE NDMM and to conduct a meta-analysis. Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched from January 2019 to June 2023, along with key congresses from January 2018 to June 2023. Bibliographies of relevant systematic literature reviews (SLR) were hand-searched. Randomized controlled trials and appropriately adjusted non-randomized studies comparing DRd versus VRd as first-line treatment for TIE NDMM were included. Overall, five records from three unique studies were identified. The fixed-effects meta-analysis showed a lower risk of disease progression or death with DRd versus VRd using the naïve approach (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.60; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.46, 0.77) as well as with the adjusted approach, which accounted for both double counting (i.e., two studies shared one comparison) and variance inflation due to studies with moderate and high risk of bias (HR: 0.56; 95% CI: 0.39, 0.82). In the absence of clinical trials with head-to-head comparison of these treatment regimens, these results could help inform the selection of optimal first-line treatment for TIE NDMM patients.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
达拉单抗、来那度胺和地塞米松与硼替佐米、来那度胺和地塞米松治疗不适合移植的新诊断多发性骨髓瘤:系统文献综述和荟萃分析
达拉单抗联合来那度胺和地塞米松(DRd)和硼替佐米联合来那度胺和地塞米松(VRd)是指南推荐的移植不符合(TIE)新诊断多发性骨髓瘤(NDMM)患者初始治疗的首选方案。本研究旨在系统地确定DRd和VRd作为TIE NDMM患者一线治疗的临床有效性证据,并进行荟萃分析。检索了2019年1月至2023年6月的Ovid MEDLINE、Embase和Cochrane Library,以及2018年1月至2023年6月的关键会议。手工检索相关系统文献综述(SLR)的参考书目。纳入了比较DRd与VRd作为TIE NDMM一线治疗的随机对照试验和适当调整的非随机研究。总的来说,从三个独特的研究中确定了五个记录。固定效应荟萃分析显示,与naïve方法相比,DRd患者的疾病进展或死亡风险更低(风险比[HR]: 0.60;95%可信区间[CI]: 0.46, 0.77)以及调整后的方法,该方法既可以解释重复计算(即两个研究共享一个比较),也可以解释由于研究具有中等和高度偏倚风险而导致的方差膨胀(HR: 0.56;95% ci: 0.39, 0.82)。在缺乏对这些治疗方案进行正面比较的临床试验的情况下,这些结果可能有助于为TIE NDMM患者选择最佳一线治疗方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Hematological Oncology
Hematological Oncology 医学-血液学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
6.10%
发文量
147
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Hematological Oncology considers for publication articles dealing with experimental and clinical aspects of neoplastic diseases of the hemopoietic and lymphoid systems and relevant related matters. Translational studies applying basic science to clinical issues are particularly welcomed. Manuscripts dealing with the following areas are encouraged: -Clinical practice and management of hematological neoplasia, including: acute and chronic leukemias, malignant lymphomas, myeloproliferative disorders -Diagnostic investigations, including imaging and laboratory assays -Epidemiology, pathology and pathobiology of hematological neoplasia of hematological diseases -Therapeutic issues including Phase 1, 2 or 3 trials as well as allogeneic and autologous stem cell transplantation studies -Aspects of the cell biology, molecular biology, molecular genetics and cytogenetics of normal or diseased hematopoeisis and lymphopoiesis, including stem cells and cytokines and other regulatory systems. Concise, topical review material is welcomed, especially if it makes new concepts and ideas accessible to a wider community. Proposals for review material may be discussed with the Editor-in-Chief. Collections of case material and case reports will be considered only if they have broader scientific or clinical relevance.
期刊最新文献
RETRACTION: Burkitt Lymphoma Versus Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: A Practical Approach. Clinical Outcomes in Double-Exposed Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Patients in Italy. Outcomes of Bridging Therapy in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Large B Cell Lymphoma Receiving Third-Line CAR T. Anatomical Localization-Based Analysis of Relapsed Secondary Central Nervous System Aggressive B-Cell Lymphoma (R-SCNSL). UMG1 Defines a Targetable Subset of T-Cell Lymphomas and Enables Precision Immunotherapy With a First-in-Class CD3ε Bispecific Engager.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1