Exercise Mildly Increases Transaortic Gradients in Aortic Stenosis With Preserved Ejection Fraction: An Invasive Hemodynamic Study

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions Pub Date : 2025-04-09 DOI:10.1002/ccd.31511
Abdullah Al-Abcha, C. Charles Jain, Rick A. Nishimura, Trevor J. Simard, Mackram F. Eleid, Benjamin Hibbert, Jae K. Oh, Blase A. Carabello, William R. Miranda
{"title":"Exercise Mildly Increases Transaortic Gradients in Aortic Stenosis With Preserved Ejection Fraction: An Invasive Hemodynamic Study","authors":"Abdullah Al-Abcha,&nbsp;C. Charles Jain,&nbsp;Rick A. Nishimura,&nbsp;Trevor J. Simard,&nbsp;Mackram F. Eleid,&nbsp;Benjamin Hibbert,&nbsp;Jae K. Oh,&nbsp;Blase A. Carabello,&nbsp;William R. Miranda","doi":"10.1002/ccd.31511","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>The assessment of aortic stenosis (AS) severity remains a challenge in some patients, and hemodynamic exercise testing has been proposed as a diagnostic tool in this population. However, the current understanding of exercise hemodynamics in AS is limited.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Retrospective review of 34 adults (aged ≥ 18 years) with ≥ moderate AS and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) undergoing exercise invasive hemodynamics (supine cycle protocol) with simultaneous measurement of aortic and left ventricular pressures.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Age was 77.1 (IQR 68.6; 84.1) years, and 50% were female. LVEF was 62.1 ± 6.6%. All patients were symptomatic. Resting aortic valve area (AVA) was 1.0 ± 0.2 cm<sup>2</sup> and aortic valve (AV) systolic mean gradient 22.0 ± 7.3 mmHg. At peak exercise (40 [IQR 30; 60] W), AV systolic mean gradient (Δ3 [0.6; 7] mmHg, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) and AVA (Δ0.2 [0; 0.6] cm<sup>2</sup>, <i>p</i> = 0.002) significantly increased, while stroke volume (SV) did not (Δ6.8 ± 19.4 ml; <i>p</i> = 0.07). Exercise-induced changes in AV systolic mean gradient were directly related to changes in cardiac output (<i>r</i> = 0.53, <i>p</i> = 0.003), being inversely related to exercise systemic vascular resistance (<i>r</i> = −0.60, <i>p</i> = 0.002). Elevated pulmonary artery wedge pressure was present in 41.2% at rest (≥ 15 mmHg) and 69.7% during exercise (≥ 25 mmHg).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Symptomatic patients with ≥ moderate AS and preserved LVEF experience small increases in AV mean gradient with exercise, and unlike the normal physiological response to exercise, there was no significant increase in SV. In most patients, AVA rose during exercise. Exercise-induced elevation in filling pressures was highly prevalent.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":9650,"journal":{"name":"Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions","volume":"106 1","pages":"181-188"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ccd.31511","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The assessment of aortic stenosis (AS) severity remains a challenge in some patients, and hemodynamic exercise testing has been proposed as a diagnostic tool in this population. However, the current understanding of exercise hemodynamics in AS is limited.

Methods

Retrospective review of 34 adults (aged ≥ 18 years) with ≥ moderate AS and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) undergoing exercise invasive hemodynamics (supine cycle protocol) with simultaneous measurement of aortic and left ventricular pressures.

Results

Age was 77.1 (IQR 68.6; 84.1) years, and 50% were female. LVEF was 62.1 ± 6.6%. All patients were symptomatic. Resting aortic valve area (AVA) was 1.0 ± 0.2 cm2 and aortic valve (AV) systolic mean gradient 22.0 ± 7.3 mmHg. At peak exercise (40 [IQR 30; 60] W), AV systolic mean gradient (Δ3 [0.6; 7] mmHg, p < 0.001) and AVA (Δ0.2 [0; 0.6] cm2, p = 0.002) significantly increased, while stroke volume (SV) did not (Δ6.8 ± 19.4 ml; p = 0.07). Exercise-induced changes in AV systolic mean gradient were directly related to changes in cardiac output (r = 0.53, p = 0.003), being inversely related to exercise systemic vascular resistance (r = −0.60, p = 0.002). Elevated pulmonary artery wedge pressure was present in 41.2% at rest (≥ 15 mmHg) and 69.7% during exercise (≥ 25 mmHg).

Conclusions

Symptomatic patients with ≥ moderate AS and preserved LVEF experience small increases in AV mean gradient with exercise, and unlike the normal physiological response to exercise, there was no significant increase in SV. In most patients, AVA rose during exercise. Exercise-induced elevation in filling pressures was highly prevalent.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
运动可轻度增加保留射血分数的主动脉狭窄的经主动脉梯度:一项有创血流动力学研究。
背景:在一些患者中,评估主动脉瓣狭窄(AS)的严重程度仍然是一个挑战,血流动力学运动试验已被提议作为这一人群的诊断工具。然而,目前对AS运动血流动力学的理解是有限的。方法:回顾性分析34例≥18岁、≥中度AS且保留左心室射血分数(LVEF)的成年人,采用运动侵入性血流动力学(仰卧循环方案)同时测量主动脉和左心室压力。结果:年龄77.1岁(IQR 68.6;84.1)岁,女性占50%。LVEF为62.1±6.6%。所有患者均有症状。静息主动脉瓣面积(AVA)为1.0±0.2 cm2,主动脉瓣平均收缩梯度(AV)为22.0±7.3 mmHg。运动高峰时(40 [IQR 30;60] W),房室收缩平均梯度(Δ3 [0.6;[7] mmHg, p 2, p = 0.002)显著升高,而卒中容积(SV)无显著差异(Δ6.8±19.4 ml;p = 0.07)。运动引起的房室收缩平均梯度变化与心输出量变化直接相关(r = 0.53, p = 0.003),与运动引起的全身血管阻力呈负相关(r = -0.60, p = 0.002)。41.2%的人在休息时(≥15 mmHg)肺动脉楔压升高,69.7%的人在运动时(≥25 mmHg)肺动脉楔压升高。结论:有症状的≥中度AS和LVEF保留患者在运动时AV平均梯度略有增加,与运动后的正常生理反应不同,SV没有显著增加。在大多数患者中,AVA在运动期间升高。运动引起的充盈压力升高非常普遍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
8.70%
发文量
419
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions is an international journal covering the broad field of cardiovascular diseases. Subject material includes basic and clinical information that is derived from or related to invasive and interventional coronary or peripheral vascular techniques. The journal focuses on material that will be of immediate practical value to physicians providing patient care in the clinical laboratory setting. To accomplish this, the journal publishes Preliminary Reports and Work In Progress articles that complement the traditional Original Studies, Case Reports, and Comprehensive Reviews. Perspective and insight concerning controversial subjects and evolving technologies are provided regularly through Editorial Commentaries furnished by members of the Editorial Board and other experts. Articles are subject to double-blind peer review and complete editorial evaluation prior to any decision regarding acceptability.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Issue Information Issue Information Efficacy of the EBU Guide Catheter as a Bailout and Selective Strategy in Challenging Right Coronary Artery Interventions Potential of a Novel Large Left Atrial Appendage Closure Device: Short-Term Outcomes of the WATCHMAN FLX Pro 40-mm Versus 35-mm
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1