Effects of protein supplementation on muscle mass, muscle strength, and physical performance in older adults with physical inactivity: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Liying Zhang, Gongxiang Liu, Xiaoli Huang, Fuqian He
{"title":"Effects of protein supplementation on muscle mass, muscle strength, and physical performance in older adults with physical inactivity: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Liying Zhang, Gongxiang Liu, Xiaoli Huang, Fuqian He","doi":"10.1186/s12877-025-05885-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Maintaining skeletal muscle mass and function in older adults is of paramount importance for preserving both quality of life and overall health. Exercise is essential for muscle maintenance; however, for older individuals with comorbidities, engaging in physical exercise may pose challenges due to decreased endurance and the inability to reach optimal exercise intensities. Several studies have investigated the effects of protein supplementation on muscle mass, strength, and physical performance in older adults. However, the results are inconsistent. The objective of this study was to systematically review and synthesize the effects of protein supplementation on muscle mass, muscle strength, and physical performance in physically inactive older adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Four databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science and the Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials) were systematically searched from inception to 31 January 2025. Two reviewers independently conducted the study screening, data extraction, risk of bias and GRADE assessments. In accordance with the PRISMA guidelines, the outcome data were synthesized using meta-analysis via RevMan5.4 software or a narrative method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight data groups from six randomized controlled trials(RCTs) were included in the analysis, stratifying participants into three physical activity(PA) trajectories: sustained low PA (n= 1), transition to structured training from low PA (n= 4), and a shift from moderate to low PA (n= 3). Protein supplementation had no statistically significant effect on total lean body mass (p> 0.05). Furthermore, secondary muscle mass parameters showed negligible intervention benefits, whereas heterogeneous outcomes were observed across muscle strength and physical performance metrics.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The influence of protein on muscle mass was not significantly efficacious, and mixed results were shown for muscle strength and physical performance. Further well-designed studies are needed to determine the effectiveness of protein supplementation to maximize its potential benefits in older individuals with physical inactivity.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This study was registered at www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/(registration no. CRD42024504443).</p>","PeriodicalId":9056,"journal":{"name":"BMC Geriatrics","volume":"25 1","pages":"228"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11978179/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Geriatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-025-05885-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Maintaining skeletal muscle mass and function in older adults is of paramount importance for preserving both quality of life and overall health. Exercise is essential for muscle maintenance; however, for older individuals with comorbidities, engaging in physical exercise may pose challenges due to decreased endurance and the inability to reach optimal exercise intensities. Several studies have investigated the effects of protein supplementation on muscle mass, strength, and physical performance in older adults. However, the results are inconsistent. The objective of this study was to systematically review and synthesize the effects of protein supplementation on muscle mass, muscle strength, and physical performance in physically inactive older adults.
Methods: Four databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science and the Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials) were systematically searched from inception to 31 January 2025. Two reviewers independently conducted the study screening, data extraction, risk of bias and GRADE assessments. In accordance with the PRISMA guidelines, the outcome data were synthesized using meta-analysis via RevMan5.4 software or a narrative method.
Results: Eight data groups from six randomized controlled trials(RCTs) were included in the analysis, stratifying participants into three physical activity(PA) trajectories: sustained low PA (n= 1), transition to structured training from low PA (n= 4), and a shift from moderate to low PA (n= 3). Protein supplementation had no statistically significant effect on total lean body mass (p> 0.05). Furthermore, secondary muscle mass parameters showed negligible intervention benefits, whereas heterogeneous outcomes were observed across muscle strength and physical performance metrics.
Conclusions: The influence of protein on muscle mass was not significantly efficacious, and mixed results were shown for muscle strength and physical performance. Further well-designed studies are needed to determine the effectiveness of protein supplementation to maximize its potential benefits in older individuals with physical inactivity.
Trial registration: This study was registered at www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/(registration no. CRD42024504443).
背景:维持老年人骨骼肌的质量和功能对于维持生活质量和整体健康至关重要。锻炼对维持肌肉是必不可少的;然而,对于有合并症的老年人,由于耐力下降和无法达到最佳运动强度,从事体育锻炼可能会带来挑战。一些研究调查了补充蛋白质对老年人肌肉质量、力量和身体表现的影响。然而,结果是不一致的。本研究的目的是系统地回顾和综合蛋白质补充对缺乏运动的老年人肌肉质量、肌肉力量和身体表现的影响。方法:系统检索4个数据库(PubMed、EMBASE、Web of Science和Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials),检索时间从成立到2025年1月31日。两名审稿人独立进行了研究筛选、数据提取、偏倚风险和GRADE评估。按照PRISMA指南,通过RevMan5.4软件或叙述性方法对结果数据进行meta分析。结果:来自6个随机对照试验(rct)的8组数据被纳入分析,将参与者分为3个身体活动(PA)轨迹:持续低PA (n= 1),从低PA过渡到结构化训练(n= 4),以及从中等到低PA的转变(n= 3)。补充蛋白质对总瘦体重没有统计学意义(p> 0.05)。此外,次要肌肉质量参数显示的干预益处可以忽略不计,而在肌肉力量和身体表现指标中观察到不同的结果。结论:蛋白质对肌肉质量的影响不显著,对肌肉力量和体能表现的影响好坏参半。需要进一步精心设计的研究来确定补充蛋白质的有效性,以最大限度地提高其对缺乏身体活动的老年人的潜在益处。试验注册:本研究在www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/(registration号注册。CRD42024504443)。
期刊介绍:
BMC Geriatrics is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in all aspects of the health and healthcare of older people, including the effects of healthcare systems and policies. The journal also welcomes research focused on the aging process, including cellular, genetic, and physiological processes and cognitive modifications.