Challenges in estimating effects of hypothetical interventions on resources patterned by structural racism: an example in a rural North Carolina Medicaid population.

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH American journal of epidemiology Pub Date : 2026-03-05 DOI:10.1093/aje/kwaf072
Mekhala V Dissanayake, John W Jackson, Chantel L Martin, Rachel Peragallo Urrutia, Michele Jonsson Funk, Mollie E Wood
{"title":"Challenges in estimating effects of hypothetical interventions on resources patterned by structural racism: an example in a rural North Carolina Medicaid population.","authors":"Mekhala V Dissanayake, John W Jackson, Chantel L Martin, Rachel Peragallo Urrutia, Michele Jonsson Funk, Mollie E Wood","doi":"10.1093/aje/kwaf072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Structural racism has likely shaped the geographic distribution and resource allocation of rural populations and marginalized racial/ethnic groups. We sought to (1) quantify disparities in severe maternal morbidity (SMM) and distributions of resources by race and racial composition of county, and (2) determine whether a hypothetical intervention on resources would reduce racial disparities in SMM, using linked birth certificates and claims from Medicaid beneficiaries giving birth from 2014 to 2019 in rural North Carolina (61 rural counties, 77 665 births). We used ratio of mediator probability weights to enact a hypothetical intervention that would equalize distributions of pregnancy care provider ratios and obstetric units across race and racial composition of county. Despite observed disparities in the distributions of resources and SMM, we were unable to demonstrate that the hypothetical interventions would reduce SMM. This may be due to a lack of common support-marginalized groups never experienced the more optimal extremes of the healthcare resources distributions that privileged groups did. Our findings may have implications for the use of causal inference methods for addressing health disparities more broadly: if distributions of resources among privileged groups are outside those that marginalized groups experience, hypothetical interventions on these distributions cannot be emulated with data.</p>","PeriodicalId":7472,"journal":{"name":"American journal of epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":"614-625"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13016653/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwaf072","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Structural racism has likely shaped the geographic distribution and resource allocation of rural populations and marginalized racial/ethnic groups. We sought to (1) quantify disparities in severe maternal morbidity (SMM) and distributions of resources by race and racial composition of county, and (2) determine whether a hypothetical intervention on resources would reduce racial disparities in SMM, using linked birth certificates and claims from Medicaid beneficiaries giving birth from 2014 to 2019 in rural North Carolina (61 rural counties, 77 665 births). We used ratio of mediator probability weights to enact a hypothetical intervention that would equalize distributions of pregnancy care provider ratios and obstetric units across race and racial composition of county. Despite observed disparities in the distributions of resources and SMM, we were unable to demonstrate that the hypothetical interventions would reduce SMM. This may be due to a lack of common support-marginalized groups never experienced the more optimal extremes of the healthcare resources distributions that privileged groups did. Our findings may have implications for the use of causal inference methods for addressing health disparities more broadly: if distributions of resources among privileged groups are outside those that marginalized groups experience, hypothetical interventions on these distributions cannot be emulated with data.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
估计假设干预对结构性种族主义资源模式影响的挑战:以北卡罗来纳州农村医疗补助人口为例。
结构性种族主义可能影响了农村人口和边缘化种族/族裔群体的地理分布和资源分配。我们试图1)量化严重孕产妇发病率(SMM)的差异和按县的种族和种族构成分配的资源,2)确定对资源的假设干预是否会减少SMM的种族差异,使用北卡罗来纳州农村地区(61个农村县,77,665例出生)2014-2019年出生的医疗补助受益人的相关出生证明和索赔。我们使用中介概率权重比率来制定一个假设的干预措施,该干预措施将使怀孕护理提供者比率和产科单位的分布在县的种族和种族构成之间均衡。尽管观察到资源分布和SMM存在差异,但我们无法证明假设的干预措施会降低SMM。这可能是由于缺乏共同的支持——边缘化群体从未经历过特权群体所经历的医疗资源分配的更理想的极端。我们的研究结果可能对使用因果推理方法来更广泛地解决健康差异具有启示意义:如果特权群体之间的资源分布超出边缘群体的资源分布,则无法用数据模拟对这些分布的假设干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American journal of epidemiology
American journal of epidemiology 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
221
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Epidemiology is the oldest and one of the premier epidemiologic journals devoted to the publication of empirical research findings, opinion pieces, and methodological developments in the field of epidemiologic research. It is a peer-reviewed journal aimed at both fellow epidemiologists and those who use epidemiologic data, including public health workers and clinicians.
期刊最新文献
Leukotriene modifying agent chemoprophylaxis for severe influenza illness: A multi-approach study. Building process improvement capacity in epidemiologic research operations: The Nurses' Health Studies experience. Critical gestational windows of heat exposure associated with preterm birth: a nationwide observational study. The Rogan-Gladen estimator for outcome misclassification. Five misconceptions about categorizing exposure variables measured with error in epidemiological research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1