Inverted internal limiting membrane flap and scleral buckling for retinal detachment with macular hole.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY BMC Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2025-04-08 DOI:10.1186/s12886-025-04022-x
Yu-Pei Chen, Yung-Jen Chen
{"title":"Inverted internal limiting membrane flap and scleral buckling for retinal detachment with macular hole.","authors":"Yu-Pei Chen, Yung-Jen Chen","doi":"10.1186/s12886-025-04022-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To evaluate anatomical and functional outcomes after vitrectomy with inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique combined with scleral buckling for eyes with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment and a coexisting macular hole.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eleven consecutive patients of primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment with a coexisting macular hole who underwent vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane flap technique combined with scleral buckling surgery between September 2014 and September 2023 were evaluated retrospectively. The main outcome measurements were the retinal reattachment rate, macular hole closure rate, and final postoperative best-corrected visual acuity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The primary retinal reattachment rate and macular hole closure rate were 100% (11/11) after initial surgery. Six patients required secondary surgery to improve vision, including cataract surgery in four patients, combined cataract surgery and silicone oil removal in one patient, and combined epiretinal membrane peeling and silicone oil removal in one patient. Visual acuity improved from 2.45 ± 0.52 logMAR preoperatively to 0.9 ± 0.26 logMAR finally (P = 0.002). However, only one patient (1/11; 9%) demonstrated microstructural recovery on optical coherence tomography (OCT) images.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane technique combined with scleral buckling achieves favorable anatomical reattachment and macular hole closure rates. The final visual outcomes improve after sequential surgeries. However, as confirmed on OCT, the microstructures did not recover in most cases.</p>","PeriodicalId":9058,"journal":{"name":"BMC Ophthalmology","volume":"25 1","pages":"185"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11980120/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-025-04022-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: To evaluate anatomical and functional outcomes after vitrectomy with inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique combined with scleral buckling for eyes with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment and a coexisting macular hole.

Methods: Eleven consecutive patients of primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment with a coexisting macular hole who underwent vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane flap technique combined with scleral buckling surgery between September 2014 and September 2023 were evaluated retrospectively. The main outcome measurements were the retinal reattachment rate, macular hole closure rate, and final postoperative best-corrected visual acuity.

Results: The primary retinal reattachment rate and macular hole closure rate were 100% (11/11) after initial surgery. Six patients required secondary surgery to improve vision, including cataract surgery in four patients, combined cataract surgery and silicone oil removal in one patient, and combined epiretinal membrane peeling and silicone oil removal in one patient. Visual acuity improved from 2.45 ± 0.52 logMAR preoperatively to 0.9 ± 0.26 logMAR finally (P = 0.002). However, only one patient (1/11; 9%) demonstrated microstructural recovery on optical coherence tomography (OCT) images.

Conclusion: Vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane technique combined with scleral buckling achieves favorable anatomical reattachment and macular hole closure rates. The final visual outcomes improve after sequential surgeries. However, as confirmed on OCT, the microstructures did not recover in most cases.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
反向内限定膜瓣及巩膜屈曲治疗视网膜脱离伴黄斑裂孔。
背景:评价玻璃体切除术联合巩膜扣带术治疗孔源性视网膜脱离伴黄斑裂孔眼的解剖和功能效果。方法:回顾性分析2014年9月至2023年9月连续行玻璃体切除术联合内限定膜瓣技术联合巩膜扣带术的11例原发性孔源性视网膜脱离合并黄斑裂孔患者。主要结果测量为视网膜再附着率、黄斑孔闭合率和最终术后最佳矫正视力。结果:术后原发性视网膜再附着率和黄斑孔闭合率均为100%(11/11)。6例患者需要二次手术改善视力,其中白内障手术4例,白内障手术联合硅油去除1例,视网膜外膜剥离联合硅油去除1例。视力由术前的2.45±0.52 logMAR改善至术后的0.9±0.26 logMAR (P = 0.002)。然而,只有1例患者(1/11;9%)在光学相干断层扫描(OCT)图像上显示微结构恢复。结论:玻璃体切割联合内限定膜技术联合巩膜扣带可获得良好的解剖再附着和黄斑孔闭合率。经过连续的手术后,最终的视力结果有所改善。然而,在OCT上证实,大多数病例的显微结构没有恢复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Ophthalmology
BMC Ophthalmology OPHTHALMOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.00%
发文量
441
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Ophthalmology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of eye disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
期刊最新文献
Laser peripheral iridotomy for treating recurrent uveitis-glaucoma-hyphema plus syndrome with a scleral fixed intraocular lens: a case report. Effect of calcium dobesilate on intraretinal cysts and exudates in non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy: a Fiji ImageJ analysis. Evaluation of reading performance in eyes simulated with different visual acuity and visual field impairment. Effectiveness of Phaco-chop, Stop&Chop, and the nitinol filament nuclear disassembly techniques for dense cataract removal. Evaluation of visual outcomes, optical quality, and patient satisfaction with a novel monofocal intraocular lens.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1