Improving and supporting quality of care in Dutch nursing homes: a quantitative study.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES BMC Health Services Research Pub Date : 2025-04-08 DOI:10.1186/s12913-025-12640-w
Bellis van den Berg, Marrit B Zuure, Paulien Vermunt, Mariëlle Zondervan-Zwijnenburg, Mirella Minkman
{"title":"Improving and supporting quality of care in Dutch nursing homes: a quantitative study.","authors":"Bellis van den Berg, Marrit B Zuure, Paulien Vermunt, Mariëlle Zondervan-Zwijnenburg, Mirella Minkman","doi":"10.1186/s12913-025-12640-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Previous research showed the potential of quality improvement programs in nursing home care. However, studies that quantitatively evaluate the effectiveness of quality of care improvement programs are scarce. In this study, we examine the results of a Dutch nation-wide programme that was established to support the implementation of the Quality Framework for Nursing Home care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Dignity & Pride at every Facility (D&PF) program was accessible to all Dutch nursing home facilities. Problem analysis per facility was conducted by means of a quantitative Quality Scan targeting all eight themes of the quality framework. Based on the baseline measurements nursing home facilities received tailored support from an external expert coach. The Quality Scan was repeated at the end of the support trajectories, 9 to 24 months later depending on the type of support provided. Scan data of 331 nursing home facilities was used to quantify the effectiveness of the D&PF program, the contribution of tailored support and the influence of organizational factors on care outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The entire pool of participating facilities scored better on the final scan (M = 3.21, SD = 0.74) than on the baseline scan (M = 2.64, SD = 0.87, p < 0.001). Greater improvements on theme level were seen when (partial) support was provided by an external expert coach. The probability of achieving high scores on care outcomes (person-centred care, resident safety and well-being) was significantly increased with high scores on organizational conditions. A multilevel model demonstrated that the themes Learning and improvement, Responsive workforce and Use of resources were statistically significant associated with positive care outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrates significant improvements across all themes of the quality framework and provides supporting evidence for the positive contribution of tailored on-site support of external expert coaches. This study also indicates that a supportive organizational environment and a learning-oriented culture are of significant importance for good care outcomes in terms of safety, person-centred care and resident well-being.</p>","PeriodicalId":9012,"journal":{"name":"BMC Health Services Research","volume":"25 1","pages":"511"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11977871/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-025-12640-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Previous research showed the potential of quality improvement programs in nursing home care. However, studies that quantitatively evaluate the effectiveness of quality of care improvement programs are scarce. In this study, we examine the results of a Dutch nation-wide programme that was established to support the implementation of the Quality Framework for Nursing Home care.

Methods: The Dignity & Pride at every Facility (D&PF) program was accessible to all Dutch nursing home facilities. Problem analysis per facility was conducted by means of a quantitative Quality Scan targeting all eight themes of the quality framework. Based on the baseline measurements nursing home facilities received tailored support from an external expert coach. The Quality Scan was repeated at the end of the support trajectories, 9 to 24 months later depending on the type of support provided. Scan data of 331 nursing home facilities was used to quantify the effectiveness of the D&PF program, the contribution of tailored support and the influence of organizational factors on care outcomes.

Results: The entire pool of participating facilities scored better on the final scan (M = 3.21, SD = 0.74) than on the baseline scan (M = 2.64, SD = 0.87, p < 0.001). Greater improvements on theme level were seen when (partial) support was provided by an external expert coach. The probability of achieving high scores on care outcomes (person-centred care, resident safety and well-being) was significantly increased with high scores on organizational conditions. A multilevel model demonstrated that the themes Learning and improvement, Responsive workforce and Use of resources were statistically significant associated with positive care outcomes.

Conclusion: This study demonstrates significant improvements across all themes of the quality framework and provides supporting evidence for the positive contribution of tailored on-site support of external expert coaches. This study also indicates that a supportive organizational environment and a learning-oriented culture are of significant importance for good care outcomes in terms of safety, person-centred care and resident well-being.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
改善和支持荷兰养老院的护理质量:一项定量研究。
背景:先前的研究显示了养老院护理质量改善计划的潜力。然而,定量评估护理质量改善计划的有效性的研究很少。在这项研究中,我们研究了荷兰全国范围内的计划的结果,该计划是为了支持养老院护理质量框架的实施而建立的。方法:每个设施的尊严与骄傲(D&PF)计划在所有荷兰养老院设施中可访问。通过针对质量框架的所有八个主题的定量质量扫描,对每个设施进行了问题分析。根据基线测量,养老院设施从外部专家教练那里获得了量身定制的支持。根据所提供的支撑类型,在支撑轨迹结束时重复进行质量扫描(9至24个月)。采用331家养老院的扫描数据来量化D&PF项目的有效性、量身定制支持的贡献以及组织因素对护理结果的影响。结果:所有参与设施的最终扫描得分(M = 3.21, SD = 0.74)高于基线扫描得分(M = 2.64, SD = 0.87, p)。结论:本研究表明,质量框架的所有主题都有显著改善,并为外部专家教练量身定制的现场支持的积极贡献提供了支持证据。本研究还表明,支持性的组织环境和以学习为导向的文化对于良好的护理结果在安全、以人为本的护理和居民福祉方面具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Health Services Research
BMC Health Services Research 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
1372
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Health Services Research is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of health services research, including delivery of care, management of health services, assessment of healthcare needs, measurement of outcomes, allocation of healthcare resources, evaluation of different health markets and health services organizations, international comparative analysis of health systems, health economics and the impact of health policies and regulations.
期刊最新文献
Regional disparities, dynamic evolution, and convergence of China's resident health service development levels. Exploring sustainable leadership among first-line managers in healthcare: a qualitative study. Unravelling the implementation of the technical support from the provincial health administration to district health management teams in the democratic Republic of Congo: a realist evaluation. Systematic review of cost-effectiveness of Chinese PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors as first-line treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma. Impact of helicopter emergency medical services base operating regime (24 h vs. 07:00-20:00) on mission volume and structure in Poland: a cross-sectional-longitudinal analysis with duty-time standardization (10 March-10 August 2025).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1