A novel classification for aseptic femoral shaft nonunion after intramedullary nailing: a retrospective study.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders Pub Date : 2025-04-08 DOI:10.1186/s12891-025-08576-1
Zhi Zhang, Xiong Wang, Qirong Zhou, Xingwen Xu, Jin Cui, Wenqiang Wei, Liehu Cao
{"title":"A novel classification for aseptic femoral shaft nonunion after intramedullary nailing: a retrospective study.","authors":"Zhi Zhang, Xiong Wang, Qirong Zhou, Xingwen Xu, Jin Cui, Wenqiang Wei, Liehu Cao","doi":"10.1186/s12891-025-08576-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although intramedullary nailing has been established as the gold standard for treating femoral shaft fractures, nonunion following intramedullary nailing remains a major concern for clinicians, severely affecting patients' walking ability and quality of life. Presently, there are certain controversies and deficiencies in nonunion classification and treatment. Herein, we propose a novel classification system for aseptic femoral shaft nonunion after intramedullary nailing based on X-ray-assessed nailing morphology and stability. Furthermore, we sought to explore the new classification's clinical significance and management implications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study involved the analysis of clinical data collected from 82 patients with aseptic bone nonunion after intramedullary nailing of femoral shaft fractures between 2010 and 2022. The patients were classified into four groups based on intramedullary nailing stability and bone defect existence, as revealed in X-ray images. The four classifications were as follows: Type I (intramedullary nailing is stable without bone defect), Type II (intramedullary nailing is stable with bone defect), Type III (intramedullary nailing is not stable without bone defect), and Type IV (intramedullary nailing is not stable with bone defect). Based on the novel classifications, we introduced individualized treatment methods. Type I patients underwent dynamization, and Type II patients received bone grafting and plate fixation. Type III patients underwent larger intramedullary nail exchange or plate fixation, and Type IV patients received larger intramedullary nail exchange and plate fixation with bone graft or double plate fixation with bone graft. Data on relevant indicators were collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All patients recovered well with no complications. The average surgery times for Types I-IV were 0.4 ± 0.1, 0.8 ± 0.2, 1.1 ± 0.4, and 1.6 ± 0.4 h, respectively. Furthermore, the mean blood loss volumes for Types I-IV were 23.4 ± 4.8, 53.3 ± 8.4, 56.3 ± 7.9, and 125.2 ± 10.8 ml, respectively. The average bone healing time of all 82 patients was 5.1 ± 1.5 months. On the other hand, the mean bone healing times for Types I-IV were 4.6 ± 1.1, 4.7 ± 1.1, 5.1 ± 1.5, and 5.7 ± 1.8 months, respectively. Furthermore, the LEFS scores for Types I-IV were 68.7 ± 3.5, 69.8 ± 3.1, 66.8 ± 3.8, and 68.6 ± 2.9 points, respectively. The mean surgery time and bleeding volume increased gradually from Types I to IV (p < 0.05) but with no significant difference between Types II and III. Moreover, there were no statistical differences in fracture healing times, LEFS scores, age, and nonunion durations across the four classifications.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The proposed novel classification system could achieve accurate diagnosis and guidance for clinical management of aseptic femoral shaft nonunion after intramedullary nailing. The corresponding individualized treatment approaches could improve prognostic outcomes and healing rates and alleviate postoperative complications.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial number: </strong>Not applicable.</p>","PeriodicalId":9189,"journal":{"name":"BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders","volume":"26 1","pages":"340"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11980232/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-025-08576-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Although intramedullary nailing has been established as the gold standard for treating femoral shaft fractures, nonunion following intramedullary nailing remains a major concern for clinicians, severely affecting patients' walking ability and quality of life. Presently, there are certain controversies and deficiencies in nonunion classification and treatment. Herein, we propose a novel classification system for aseptic femoral shaft nonunion after intramedullary nailing based on X-ray-assessed nailing morphology and stability. Furthermore, we sought to explore the new classification's clinical significance and management implications.

Methods: This retrospective study involved the analysis of clinical data collected from 82 patients with aseptic bone nonunion after intramedullary nailing of femoral shaft fractures between 2010 and 2022. The patients were classified into four groups based on intramedullary nailing stability and bone defect existence, as revealed in X-ray images. The four classifications were as follows: Type I (intramedullary nailing is stable without bone defect), Type II (intramedullary nailing is stable with bone defect), Type III (intramedullary nailing is not stable without bone defect), and Type IV (intramedullary nailing is not stable with bone defect). Based on the novel classifications, we introduced individualized treatment methods. Type I patients underwent dynamization, and Type II patients received bone grafting and plate fixation. Type III patients underwent larger intramedullary nail exchange or plate fixation, and Type IV patients received larger intramedullary nail exchange and plate fixation with bone graft or double plate fixation with bone graft. Data on relevant indicators were collected.

Results: All patients recovered well with no complications. The average surgery times for Types I-IV were 0.4 ± 0.1, 0.8 ± 0.2, 1.1 ± 0.4, and 1.6 ± 0.4 h, respectively. Furthermore, the mean blood loss volumes for Types I-IV were 23.4 ± 4.8, 53.3 ± 8.4, 56.3 ± 7.9, and 125.2 ± 10.8 ml, respectively. The average bone healing time of all 82 patients was 5.1 ± 1.5 months. On the other hand, the mean bone healing times for Types I-IV were 4.6 ± 1.1, 4.7 ± 1.1, 5.1 ± 1.5, and 5.7 ± 1.8 months, respectively. Furthermore, the LEFS scores for Types I-IV were 68.7 ± 3.5, 69.8 ± 3.1, 66.8 ± 3.8, and 68.6 ± 2.9 points, respectively. The mean surgery time and bleeding volume increased gradually from Types I to IV (p < 0.05) but with no significant difference between Types II and III. Moreover, there were no statistical differences in fracture healing times, LEFS scores, age, and nonunion durations across the four classifications.

Conclusions: The proposed novel classification system could achieve accurate diagnosis and guidance for clinical management of aseptic femoral shaft nonunion after intramedullary nailing. The corresponding individualized treatment approaches could improve prognostic outcomes and healing rates and alleviate postoperative complications.

Clinical trial number: Not applicable.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
髓内钉治疗无菌性股骨干骨不连的新分类:回顾性研究。
背景:虽然髓内钉已被确立为治疗股骨干骨折的金标准,但髓内钉后骨不连仍然是临床医生关注的主要问题,严重影响患者的行走能力和生活质量。目前,在骨不连的分类和治疗上存在一定的争议和不足。在此,我们提出了一个新的分类系统,无菌股骨干骨不连髓内钉后,基于x线评估钉形态和稳定性。此外,我们试图探讨新的分类的临床意义和管理意义。方法:回顾性分析2010 ~ 2022年收治的82例股骨干骨折髓内钉治疗后无菌性骨不连的临床资料。根据x线片显示的髓内钉稳定性和骨缺损情况将患者分为四组。四种类型分别为:I型(髓内钉稳定无骨缺损)、II型(髓内钉稳定伴骨缺损)、III型(髓内钉不稳定伴骨缺损)、IV型(髓内钉不稳定伴骨缺损)。在新分类的基础上,我们引入了个体化治疗方法。I型患者行动力化,II型患者行植骨和钢板固定。III型患者行较大髓内钉交换或钢板固定,IV型患者行较大髓内钉交换+钢板固定联合植骨或双钢板固定联合植骨。收集了有关指标的数据。结果:所有患者均恢复良好,无并发症。I-IV型平均手术时间分别为0.4±0.1、0.8±0.2、1.1±0.4和1.6±0.4 h。I-IV型患者平均失血量分别为23.4±4.8 ml、53.3±8.4 ml、56.3±7.9 ml和125.2±10.8 ml。82例患者平均骨愈合时间为5.1±1.5个月。I-IV型患者的平均骨愈合时间分别为4.6±1.1个月、4.7±1.1个月、5.1±1.5个月和5.7±1.8个月。其中,I-IV型的LEFS评分分别为68.7±3.5分、69.8±3.1分、66.8±3.8分和68.6±2.9分。从I型到IV型,平均手术时间和出血量逐渐增加(p)。结论:提出的新型分类系统能够准确诊断髓内钉术后无菌性股骨干骨不连,指导临床处理。相应的个体化治疗方法可改善预后和治愈率,减轻术后并发症。临床试验号:不适用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 医学-风湿病学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
8.70%
发文量
1017
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of musculoskeletal disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology. The scope of the Journal covers research into rheumatic diseases where the primary focus relates specifically to a component(s) of the musculoskeletal system.
期刊最新文献
Clinical outcomes of subtalar arthroereisis in pediatric flatfoot with or without spring ligament repair. Osteoporosis documentation following hip fracture: a retrospective cohort study from a tertiary hospital. Optimizing osteotomy in ankylosing spondylitis-induced kyphosis: anatomical insights and novel instrumentation. Finite element analysis of acromioclavicular joint stress in the treatment of Neer II distal clavicular fracture. The impact of peri-interventional factors on pain reduction in glenohumeral corticosteroid injections.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1