Risk of mortality and maternal status are key determinants of the dynamic use of cover by moose in a landscape characterized by forest harvesting.

IF 2.3 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY Oecologia Pub Date : 2025-04-09 DOI:10.1007/s00442-025-05703-6
Lisa Jeanne Koetke, Dexter P Hodder, Chris J Johnson, Morgan Anderson
{"title":"Risk of mortality and maternal status are key determinants of the dynamic use of cover by moose in a landscape characterized by forest harvesting.","authors":"Lisa Jeanne Koetke, Dexter P Hodder, Chris J Johnson, Morgan Anderson","doi":"10.1007/s00442-025-05703-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Human-caused landscape disturbance is one of the most widespread threats to wildlife. Forest harvesting reduces canopy closure, an important component of habitat that allows ungulates to mitigate warm temperatures and deep snow. These pressures may be exacerbated by the warming temperatures and increased snowfall associated with climate change. Also, linear features that result from human activities increase the movement rate and efficiency of predators. We used LiDAR and GPS-collar data to test three hypotheses that explained the use of forest cover by female moose (Alces americanus) in a landscape characterized by extensive forest harvest; the Thermal Stress, Locomotion, and Direct Mortality Hypotheses. The risk of direct mortality by predation and during the licensed hunting season was the primary factor influencing the use of horizontal and vertical cover by moose. Moose used less horizontal cover when accompanied by a neonate and in areas with greater risk of predation by wolves. Maternal status of moose mediated their use of vertical cover to avoid predation. Moose also used more horizontal and vertical cover during peak hunting season and in the spring and summer. Our results suggest that the use of forest type and cover by moose differs, from open to closed, depending on the type of threat and reproductive status. When managing moose habitat, we recommend maintaining forests that vary in structure and cover, attributes often associated with a spatially adjacent mix of young and old forest.</p>","PeriodicalId":19473,"journal":{"name":"Oecologia","volume":"207 4","pages":"64"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oecologia","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-025-05703-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Human-caused landscape disturbance is one of the most widespread threats to wildlife. Forest harvesting reduces canopy closure, an important component of habitat that allows ungulates to mitigate warm temperatures and deep snow. These pressures may be exacerbated by the warming temperatures and increased snowfall associated with climate change. Also, linear features that result from human activities increase the movement rate and efficiency of predators. We used LiDAR and GPS-collar data to test three hypotheses that explained the use of forest cover by female moose (Alces americanus) in a landscape characterized by extensive forest harvest; the Thermal Stress, Locomotion, and Direct Mortality Hypotheses. The risk of direct mortality by predation and during the licensed hunting season was the primary factor influencing the use of horizontal and vertical cover by moose. Moose used less horizontal cover when accompanied by a neonate and in areas with greater risk of predation by wolves. Maternal status of moose mediated their use of vertical cover to avoid predation. Moose also used more horizontal and vertical cover during peak hunting season and in the spring and summer. Our results suggest that the use of forest type and cover by moose differs, from open to closed, depending on the type of threat and reproductive status. When managing moose habitat, we recommend maintaining forests that vary in structure and cover, attributes often associated with a spatially adjacent mix of young and old forest.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在以森林采伐为特征的景观中,死亡风险和产妇状况是驼鹿动态利用覆盖物的关键决定因素。
人为造成的景观干扰是对野生动物最普遍的威胁之一。森林采伐减少了冠层闭合,而冠层闭合是有蹄类动物栖息地的重要组成部分,它使有蹄类动物能够适应温暖的温度和深厚的积雪。与气候变化相关的气温变暖和降雪量增加可能会加剧这些压力。此外,人类活动导致的线性特征增加了捕食者的移动速度和效率。我们使用激光雷达和gps项圈数据来验证三种假设,这些假设解释了在森林广泛采伐的景观中,雌性驼鹿(Alces americanus)利用森林覆盖的情况;热应力、运动和直接死亡假说。影响驼鹿利用水平和垂直覆盖物的主要因素是捕食和许可狩猎季节直接死亡的风险。驼鹿在有幼鹿陪伴的情况下,以及在更容易被狼捕食的地区,较少使用水平掩体。驼鹿的母性决定了它们利用垂直掩体来躲避捕食。驼鹿在狩猎旺季和春夏也更多地使用水平和垂直掩体。结果表明,驼鹿对森林类型和覆盖的利用,根据威胁类型和繁殖状况,从开放到封闭有所不同。在管理驼鹿栖息地时,我们建议保持结构和覆盖范围不同的森林,这些属性通常与年轻森林和老森林在空间上相邻的混合有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Oecologia
Oecologia 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
192
审稿时长
5.3 months
期刊介绍: Oecologia publishes innovative ecological research of international interest. We seek reviews, advances in methodology, and original contributions, emphasizing the following areas: Population ecology, Plant-microbe-animal interactions, Ecosystem ecology, Community ecology, Global change ecology, Conservation ecology, Behavioral ecology and Physiological Ecology. In general, studies that are purely descriptive, mathematical, documentary, and/or natural history will not be considered.
期刊最新文献
Trait- and environment-based determinants of reproduction in the old forest indicator lichen Lobaria pulmonaria. Plant invasion reduces density-dependent pollination but not florivory. Quantitative fatty acid signature analysis (QFASA) to explore the diet of the plateau pika (Ochotona curzoniae) during winter on the Qinghai-Xizang (Tibetan) plateau. Fertilization and herbivore exclusion promote more deterministic processes in plant community assembly on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Leaf status drives shifts in both community composition and trophic mode of foliar endophytic fungi via variation in functional traits in Tibetan alpine meadow.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1