Comparative effects of different macronutrient compositions for type 2 diabetes management: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized trials.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Journal of Health, Population, and Nutrition Pub Date : 2025-04-08 DOI:10.1186/s41043-025-00818-1
Negin Badrooj, Ahmad Jayedi, Sakineh Shab-Bidar
{"title":"Comparative effects of different macronutrient compositions for type 2 diabetes management: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized trials.","authors":"Negin Badrooj, Ahmad Jayedi, Sakineh Shab-Bidar","doi":"10.1186/s41043-025-00818-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To assess and rank the comparative effects of different exact macronutrient compositions for type 2 diabetes management rather than examining single macronutrients or as a dietary pattern.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched. Randomized controlled trials were included. A random-effects network meta-analysis with a Bayesian framework was performed to calculate the mean difference (MD) and 95% credible intervals (CrIs). The certainty of evidence was rated using the GRADE approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>80 trials with 9232 patients with type 2 diabetes were included in the network meta-analysis. A very low-carbohydrate, high-protein, and calorie-restricted diet had the greatest effect on reducing HbA<sub>1c</sub> (range of mean difference: - 1.0% to - 1.79%), weight (range of mean difference: -5.83 kg to -10.96 kg), and FPG (range of mean difference: - 2.20 mmol/L to - 2.88 mmol/L) at 6-month follow-up, but at 12-month follow-up, the effect remained only for HbA<sub>1c</sub> (range of mean difference: - 1.25% to - 1.30%) and FPG (range of mean difference: - 1.21 mmol/L to - 1.27 mmol/L). For weight loss in 12-month follow-up, the low-carbohydrate, high-protein diet was probably the most effective approach (range of mean difference: - 10.05 kg to - 14.52 kg). The best dietary approach to reduce LDL at 6-month follow-up was a low carbohydrate, high protein, calorie-restricted diet (range of mean difference: - 0.49 mmol/L to - 0.59 mmol/L) and at 12-month follow-up, a moderate carbohydrate, standard protein, calorie-restricted diet was effective in reducing LDL (mean difference: - 0.87 mmol/L, 95%CrI - 1.55 to - 0.16).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A very low carbohydrate, high protein, calorie-restricted diet can be an effective dietary composition in managing diabetes, but milder dietary carbohydrate restriction for weight loss in the long-term, and improving lipid profiles is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":15969,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health, Population, and Nutrition","volume":"44 1","pages":"108"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11977911/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health, Population, and Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41043-025-00818-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: To assess and rank the comparative effects of different exact macronutrient compositions for type 2 diabetes management rather than examining single macronutrients or as a dietary pattern.

Methods: PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched. Randomized controlled trials were included. A random-effects network meta-analysis with a Bayesian framework was performed to calculate the mean difference (MD) and 95% credible intervals (CrIs). The certainty of evidence was rated using the GRADE approach.

Results: 80 trials with 9232 patients with type 2 diabetes were included in the network meta-analysis. A very low-carbohydrate, high-protein, and calorie-restricted diet had the greatest effect on reducing HbA1c (range of mean difference: - 1.0% to - 1.79%), weight (range of mean difference: -5.83 kg to -10.96 kg), and FPG (range of mean difference: - 2.20 mmol/L to - 2.88 mmol/L) at 6-month follow-up, but at 12-month follow-up, the effect remained only for HbA1c (range of mean difference: - 1.25% to - 1.30%) and FPG (range of mean difference: - 1.21 mmol/L to - 1.27 mmol/L). For weight loss in 12-month follow-up, the low-carbohydrate, high-protein diet was probably the most effective approach (range of mean difference: - 10.05 kg to - 14.52 kg). The best dietary approach to reduce LDL at 6-month follow-up was a low carbohydrate, high protein, calorie-restricted diet (range of mean difference: - 0.49 mmol/L to - 0.59 mmol/L) and at 12-month follow-up, a moderate carbohydrate, standard protein, calorie-restricted diet was effective in reducing LDL (mean difference: - 0.87 mmol/L, 95%CrI - 1.55 to - 0.16).

Conclusions: A very low carbohydrate, high protein, calorie-restricted diet can be an effective dietary composition in managing diabetes, but milder dietary carbohydrate restriction for weight loss in the long-term, and improving lipid profiles is needed.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同常量营养素组合对2型糖尿病治疗的比较效果:随机试验的系统回顾和网络荟萃分析。
背景:评估和排名不同确切的宏量营养素组成对2型糖尿病管理的比较效果,而不是检查单一的宏量营养素或作为一种饮食模式。方法:检索PubMed、Scopus和Cochrane图书馆中央对照试验登记册。纳入随机对照试验。采用贝叶斯框架进行随机效应网络meta分析,计算平均差(MD)和95%可信区间(CrIs)。使用GRADE方法对证据的确定性进行评级。结果:80项试验9232例2型糖尿病患者被纳入网络荟萃分析。非常低碳水化合物、高蛋白和限制热量饮食的效果最大降低糖化血红蛋白(平均差范围:- 1.0% - 1.79%)、体重(平均差范围:-5.83公斤,-10.96公斤),和台塑(平均差范围:- 2.20更易与L - 2.88更易与L)在6个月随访,但在12个月的随访,效果仍然只对糖化血红蛋白(平均差范围:- 1.25% - 1.30%)和台塑(平均差范围:- 1.21更易与L - 1.27更易/ L)。在12个月的随访中,低碳水化合物、高蛋白饮食可能是最有效的减肥方法(平均差值范围:- 10.05 kg至- 14.52 kg)。在6个月的随访中,降低LDL的最佳饮食方法是低碳水化合物,高蛋白,热量限制饮食(平均差值范围:- 0.49 mmol/L至- 0.59 mmol/L),在12个月的随访中,中等碳水化合物,标准蛋白质,热量限制饮食可有效降低LDL(平均差值:- 0.87 mmol/L, 95%CrI - 1.55至- 0.16)。结论:非常低碳水化合物、高蛋白、限制热量的饮食可以是控制糖尿病的有效饮食组成,但从长期来看,需要适度的饮食碳水化合物限制来减轻体重,并改善血脂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Health, Population, and Nutrition
Journal of Health, Population, and Nutrition 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Health, Population and Nutrition brings together research on all aspects of issues related to population, nutrition and health. The journal publishes articles across a broad range of topics including global health, maternal and child health, nutrition, common illnesses and determinants of population health.
期刊最新文献
Sustainability in university restaurants: a scoping review of evaluation focus and strategies. The remnant cholesterol inflammatory index and risk of future cardiovascular disease in early CKM syndrome: findings from CHARLS. Prevalence and associated factors of acute diarrhea among under-five children in community-led total sanitation and hygiene implemented and non-implemented kebeles in Chiro Woreda, Eastern Ethiopia. Machine learning-based prediction model for fall risk among individuals with arthritis in China: an analysis using the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS) database. Socio-demographic factors influencing obesity among ever-married Jordanian women of reproductive age: insights from the 2023 Jordan demographic and health survey.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1