Comparison of survival outcomes in preemptive versus non-preemptive kidney transplant recipients.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Journal of Research in Medical Sciences Pub Date : 2025-02-28 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.4103/jrms.jrms_122_24
Firouzeh Moeinzadeh, Shahrzad Shahidi, Raheleh Heidari, Mojgan Mortazavi, Marjan Mansourian, Bahareh Botlani Yadegar
{"title":"Comparison of survival outcomes in preemptive versus non-preemptive kidney transplant recipients.","authors":"Firouzeh Moeinzadeh, Shahrzad Shahidi, Raheleh Heidari, Mojgan Mortazavi, Marjan Mansourian, Bahareh Botlani Yadegar","doi":"10.4103/jrms.jrms_122_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There are conflicting results regarding survival in preemptive versus non-preemptive kidney transplant recipients. The present study aimed to estimate the risk of death in preemptive versus non-preemptive kidney transplant recipients.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In the present retrospective cohort study, all end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients who underwent kidney transplantation between 1996 and 2021 in referral kidney transplantation centers in Isfahan province were investigated. In total, 499 patients who received dialysis before kidney transplantation (non-preemptive) and 168 patients who received no dialysis before kidney transplantation (preemptive) were included in the final analysis. Data regarding demographic and clinical variables including sex, age, body mass index (BMI), follow-up duration, immunosuppressive regimen change, kidney donor type, underlying causes of ESRD, and comorbidities before and after kidney transplantation were collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age was 55.47 ± 15.53 years in preemptive and 54.87 ± 14.69 years in non-preemptive patients (<i>P</i> = 0.65). Mortality rates were 24.44/1000 person-years of follow-up for preemptive and 18.25/1000 person-years of follow-up for non-preemptive patients (<i>P</i> = 0.013). In the crude model of Cox regression analysis, preemptive kidney transplant recipients had a significantly higher risk of mortality compared to non-preemptive kidney transplant recipients (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.59; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.09-2.33; <i>P</i> = 0.015). However, the association attenuated and became insignificant after adjustment for confounders, including age, BMI, immunosuppressive regimen change, kidney donor type, and comorbidities (HR = 1.35; 95% CI: 0.92-1.99; <i>P</i> = 0.12).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of the present study indicated that there is no independent association between preemptive kidney transplantation and increased risk of mortality.</p>","PeriodicalId":50062,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Medical Sciences","volume":"30 ","pages":"11"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11974598/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research in Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jrms.jrms_122_24","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There are conflicting results regarding survival in preemptive versus non-preemptive kidney transplant recipients. The present study aimed to estimate the risk of death in preemptive versus non-preemptive kidney transplant recipients.

Materials and methods: In the present retrospective cohort study, all end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients who underwent kidney transplantation between 1996 and 2021 in referral kidney transplantation centers in Isfahan province were investigated. In total, 499 patients who received dialysis before kidney transplantation (non-preemptive) and 168 patients who received no dialysis before kidney transplantation (preemptive) were included in the final analysis. Data regarding demographic and clinical variables including sex, age, body mass index (BMI), follow-up duration, immunosuppressive regimen change, kidney donor type, underlying causes of ESRD, and comorbidities before and after kidney transplantation were collected.

Results: The mean age was 55.47 ± 15.53 years in preemptive and 54.87 ± 14.69 years in non-preemptive patients (P = 0.65). Mortality rates were 24.44/1000 person-years of follow-up for preemptive and 18.25/1000 person-years of follow-up for non-preemptive patients (P = 0.013). In the crude model of Cox regression analysis, preemptive kidney transplant recipients had a significantly higher risk of mortality compared to non-preemptive kidney transplant recipients (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.59; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.09-2.33; P = 0.015). However, the association attenuated and became insignificant after adjustment for confounders, including age, BMI, immunosuppressive regimen change, kidney donor type, and comorbidities (HR = 1.35; 95% CI: 0.92-1.99; P = 0.12).

Conclusion: The results of the present study indicated that there is no independent association between preemptive kidney transplantation and increased risk of mortality.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
先发制人与非先发制人肾移植受者生存结局的比较。
背景:关于先发与非先发肾移植受者的生存存在矛盾的结果。本研究旨在评估先发制人与非先发制人肾移植受者的死亡风险。材料和方法:在本回顾性队列研究中,对1996年至2021年间在伊斯法罕省转诊肾移植中心接受肾移植的所有终末期肾病(ESRD)患者进行了调查。最终分析共纳入499例肾移植前透析患者(非优先)和168例肾移植前未透析患者(优先)。收集有关人口统计学和临床变量的数据,包括性别、年龄、体重指数(BMI)、随访时间、免疫抑制方案改变、肾供体类型、ESRD的潜在原因以及肾移植前后的合并症。结果:先发组平均年龄55.47±15.53岁,非先发组平均年龄54.87±14.69岁(P = 0.65)。患者死亡率分别为24.44/1000人-年(P = 0.013)和18.25/1000人-年(P = 0.013)。在Cox回归分析的粗模型中,先发肾移植受者的死亡风险明显高于非先发肾移植受者(风险比[HR] = 1.59;95%置信区间[CI]: 1.09-2.33;P = 0.015)。然而,在调整混杂因素(包括年龄、BMI、免疫抑制方案改变、供肾类型和合并症)后,这种关联减弱并变得不显著(HR = 1.35;95% ci: 0.92-1.99;P = 0.12)。结论:本研究结果表明,先发制人的肾移植与死亡风险增加之间没有独立的关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Research in Medical Sciences
Journal of Research in Medical Sciences MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
6.20%
发文量
75
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Research in Medical Sciences, a publication of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, is a peer-reviewed online continuous journal with print on demand compilation of issues published. The journal’s full text is available online at http://www.jmsjournal.net. The journal allows free access (Open Access) to its contents and permits authors to self-archive final accepted version of the articles on any OAI-compliant institutional / subject-based repository.
期刊最新文献
Impact of an 8-week home-based resistance training and leisure-time physical activity on serum glucagon-like peptide-1 and microRNA-192 levels in children with type 1 diabetes: A randomized clinical trial. Investigating the level of agreement in the measurement of coronary artery calcification among radiology technicians and radiology specialists. Polyautoimmunity and multiple autoimmune syndromes: A neglected clinical challenge. Comparison of the performance of machine learning algorithms for the task-switching functional magnetic resonance imaging data for distinguishing attention deficit hyperactivity disorder from bipolar disorder. The effects of purslane consumption on blood pressure in adults: A grading of recommendations, assessment, development, and evaluation-assessed systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1