A Randomized Controlled Trial for Dual-Agent Local Analgesic in Sling Surgery.

IF 1.2 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Urogynecology (Hagerstown, Md.) Pub Date : 2026-02-01 DOI:10.1097/SPV.0000000000001691
Mildrede N Bonglack, Marlana M Ray, Meredith H Carrel-Lammert, Kelsey E Lewis, Jennifer Yeung, Jonathan M Hoehn, Rachel N Pauls, Catrina C Crisp
{"title":"A Randomized Controlled Trial for Dual-Agent Local Analgesic in Sling Surgery.","authors":"Mildrede N Bonglack, Marlana M Ray, Meredith H Carrel-Lammert, Kelsey E Lewis, Jennifer Yeung, Jonathan M Hoehn, Rachel N Pauls, Catrina C Crisp","doi":"10.1097/SPV.0000000000001691","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Narcotic use after retropubic suburethral sling surgery is not unusual. Surgeons may consider using topical analgesics to minimize narcotic use.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of the study was to determine if using bupivacaine-meloxicam (Zynrelef) reduces narcotic use in the first 3 days after surgery, measured as morphine milligram equivalents (MME). Secondary aims were to compare, postoperatively, average and worst pain, satisfaction with pain control and quality of recovery between groups.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>This was a single-center prospective single-blinded randomized controlled trial for women undergoing retropubic sling surgery. The intervention arm received Zynrelef at the suprapubic incisions, no placebo was used in controls. Participants tracked pain levels, medication use, satisfaction with pain control and Quality of Recovery surveys in the first 3 postoperative days. Appropriate statistical analyses were applied.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 119 women were randomized. For primary outcome, totalmedian MME from postoperative days 0-3, the control group used 37.5 MME compared to 30 MME in the Zynrelef group (interquartile range [IQR] 5.63-71.25; P  = 0.61). Pain scores were low in both groups, participants were satisfied or very satisfied with pain control. Quality of recovery scores were similar between groups, with improvement by postoperative day 3 to near baseline scores. Patients with anxiety/depression used more oxycodone; 10 mg (IQR 0-30) vs 0 mg (IQR 0-15), P  = 0.0027.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Use of Zynrelef during retropubic sling surgery does not reduce narcotic use in the first 3 days postoperatively. Patients can be reassured that pain and narcotic use after surgery are low and recovery is quick.</p>","PeriodicalId":75288,"journal":{"name":"Urogynecology (Hagerstown, Md.)","volume":" ","pages":"124-130"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urogynecology (Hagerstown, Md.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000001691","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Narcotic use after retropubic suburethral sling surgery is not unusual. Surgeons may consider using topical analgesics to minimize narcotic use.

Objectives: The aim of the study was to determine if using bupivacaine-meloxicam (Zynrelef) reduces narcotic use in the first 3 days after surgery, measured as morphine milligram equivalents (MME). Secondary aims were to compare, postoperatively, average and worst pain, satisfaction with pain control and quality of recovery between groups.

Study design: This was a single-center prospective single-blinded randomized controlled trial for women undergoing retropubic sling surgery. The intervention arm received Zynrelef at the suprapubic incisions, no placebo was used in controls. Participants tracked pain levels, medication use, satisfaction with pain control and Quality of Recovery surveys in the first 3 postoperative days. Appropriate statistical analyses were applied.

Results: A total of 119 women were randomized. For primary outcome, totalmedian MME from postoperative days 0-3, the control group used 37.5 MME compared to 30 MME in the Zynrelef group (interquartile range [IQR] 5.63-71.25; P  = 0.61). Pain scores were low in both groups, participants were satisfied or very satisfied with pain control. Quality of recovery scores were similar between groups, with improvement by postoperative day 3 to near baseline scores. Patients with anxiety/depression used more oxycodone; 10 mg (IQR 0-30) vs 0 mg (IQR 0-15), P  = 0.0027.

Conclusions: Use of Zynrelef during retropubic sling surgery does not reduce narcotic use in the first 3 days postoperatively. Patients can be reassured that pain and narcotic use after surgery are low and recovery is quick.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
双药局部镇痛在吊带手术中的随机对照试验。
重要性:耻骨后喉下悬吊手术后使用麻醉剂并不罕见。外科医生可以考虑使用局部镇痛药来减少麻醉的使用。目的:本研究的目的是确定布比卡因-美洛昔康(Zynrelef)是否在手术后3天内减少麻醉剂的使用,以吗啡毫克当量(MME)衡量。次要目的是比较两组患者术后平均疼痛和最严重疼痛、疼痛控制满意度和恢复质量。研究设计:这是一项针对接受耻骨后吊带手术的女性的单中心前瞻性单盲随机对照试验。干预组在耻骨上切口处接受Zynrelef治疗,对照组未使用安慰剂。参与者在术后前3天跟踪疼痛程度、药物使用、疼痛控制满意度和恢复质量调查。应用了适当的统计分析。结果:共119名女性被随机化。对于主要终点,术后0-3天的总中位MME,对照组为37.5 MME,而Zynrelef组为30 MME(四分位数间距[IQR] 5.63-71.25;P = 0.61)。两组的疼痛评分都很低,参与者对疼痛控制感到满意或非常满意。两组之间的恢复质量评分相似,术后第3天改善至接近基线评分。焦虑/抑郁患者羟考酮用量较多;10 mg (IQR 0-30) vs 0 mg (IQR 0-15), P = 0.0027。结论:耻骨后吊带手术中使用Zynrelef并不能减少术后3天麻醉品的使用。患者可以放心,手术后疼痛和麻醉剂的使用很低,恢复很快。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Urinary Retention After Midurethral Sling: RCT of Retropubic Lidocaine Versus Saline. National Access to Pelvic Floor Physical Therapy: A Secret Shopper Study. Patient Reported Recovery After Surgery. Patients' Decisions to Undergo Colpocleisis: A Qualitative Study. Postpartum Pelvic Floor Physical Therapy Referral Rates in a Multihospital System.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1