Detection of Temporal Clinical Events in Non-Temporal, Non-Annotated Data.

Dimitrios Zikos, Philip Eappen, Ryan N Schmidt
{"title":"Detection of Temporal Clinical Events in Non-Temporal, Non-Annotated Data.","authors":"Dimitrios Zikos, Philip Eappen, Ryan N Schmidt","doi":"10.3233/SHTI250038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study developed and validated a Bayesian method which detects pairs of clinical events likely to be temporally ordered.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Association mining rules between medical procedures were extracted into a research-generated database and, for each pair of procedures A,B, the conditional probability P(A|B), its inverse, and the difference from its inverse (ConfDiff) were calculated. The study hypothesized that the higher the ConfDiff is, the more likely it is for A and B to be temporally ordered. The actual calendar date of each medical procedure served as ground truth.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ConfDiff is the strongest predictor of %Tseq (r=0.278), followed by P(B|A) (r=0.129). This association continued to be present after controlling for the confidence, leverage and conviction metrics.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Findings substantiate the assumption that, in a structured process-based domain (e.g., clinical care) if an attribute is strongly associated with another one, but not the other way around, this could imply temporality.</p>","PeriodicalId":94357,"journal":{"name":"Studies in health technology and informatics","volume":"323 ","pages":"11-15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in health technology and informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/SHTI250038","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: This study developed and validated a Bayesian method which detects pairs of clinical events likely to be temporally ordered.

Methods: Association mining rules between medical procedures were extracted into a research-generated database and, for each pair of procedures A,B, the conditional probability P(A|B), its inverse, and the difference from its inverse (ConfDiff) were calculated. The study hypothesized that the higher the ConfDiff is, the more likely it is for A and B to be temporally ordered. The actual calendar date of each medical procedure served as ground truth.

Results: ConfDiff is the strongest predictor of %Tseq (r=0.278), followed by P(B|A) (r=0.129). This association continued to be present after controlling for the confidence, leverage and conviction metrics.

Conclusion: Findings substantiate the assumption that, in a structured process-based domain (e.g., clinical care) if an attribute is strongly associated with another one, but not the other way around, this could imply temporality.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在非时间、非注释数据中检测时间临床事件。
简介:本研究开发并验证了一种贝叶斯方法:本研究开发并验证了一种贝叶斯方法,该方法可检测出可能在时间上有序的成对临床事件:方法:从研究生成的数据库中提取医疗程序之间的关联挖掘规则,并计算每一对程序 A、B 的条件概率 P(A|B)、其逆概率以及与逆概率之差(ConfDiff)。研究假设,ConfDiff 越高,A 和 B 在时间上排序的可能性就越大。每个医疗程序的实际日历日期作为基本事实:结果:ConfDiff 是 %Tseq 的最强预测因子(r=0.278),其次是 P(B|A)(r=0.129)。在控制了置信度、杠杆率和确信度指标后,这种关联依然存在:研究结果证实了以下假设:在基于结构化流程的领域(如临床护理)中,如果一个属性与另一个属性密切相关,而不是相反,这可能意味着时间性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Advancing Digital Evaluation for Inter-Professional Education: A PROLIFERATE_AI Mixed-Methods Analysis. A Personalised Digital Health Intervention for Prediabetes. Extreme Heat and Emergency Department Presentations for Circulatory and Respiratory Conditions: A 5-Year Study in Two Large Hospitals in Australia. Delivering Digital Health Education to Undergraduates Using Virtual Hospital Education Resources. cpThrive: A Story of Development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1