Buckling behavior of cold-formed high-strength steel sections: Numerical insights and design implications

IF 4.3 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Structures Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-10 DOI:10.1016/j.istruc.2025.108887
Harith Iskandar, J.M. Irwan, Ayad Mutafi
{"title":"Buckling behavior of cold-formed high-strength steel sections: Numerical insights and design implications","authors":"Harith Iskandar,&nbsp;J.M. Irwan,&nbsp;Ayad Mutafi","doi":"10.1016/j.istruc.2025.108887","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Cold-formed high-strength steel (HSS) offers practical advantages, like thinner cross-sections that reduce material costs. Recent research suggests these steel members may be more resilient than once thought, developing localized plastic deformations that improve resistance, even if they don’t behave like traditional ductile materials. However, design complexities persist due to insufficient research on buckling behavior in HSS cold-formed columns. A crucial factor that has not been widely explored is the impact of cross-sectional geometry, particularly the corner shape of square hollow sections (SHS), on their buckling behavior. This study investigates the buckling behavior of high-strength cold-formed steel square hollow sections (SHS) under axial compression, focusing on the influence of corner geometry, material properties, and section thickness. Finite element analysis conducted using Abaqus revealed that sharp-cornered sections demonstrate superior buckling resistance and higher ultimate axial loads compared to round-cornered sections, while the latter exhibit better post-buckling ductility. A parametric study highlighted the critical role of section thickness and corner radius in enhancing structural performance, with thicker sections and smaller radii showing increased resistance and reduced slenderness. Comparisons with Eurocode 3 revealed discrepancies, emphasizing the need for updates to account for the behavior of high-strength steel and complex geometries. The findings provide valuable insights for optimizing design practices, ensuring safer and more efficient structures, and advancing guidelines for high-strength cold-formed steel applications</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48642,"journal":{"name":"Structures","volume":"76 ","pages":"Article 108887"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352012425007015","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cold-formed high-strength steel (HSS) offers practical advantages, like thinner cross-sections that reduce material costs. Recent research suggests these steel members may be more resilient than once thought, developing localized plastic deformations that improve resistance, even if they don’t behave like traditional ductile materials. However, design complexities persist due to insufficient research on buckling behavior in HSS cold-formed columns. A crucial factor that has not been widely explored is the impact of cross-sectional geometry, particularly the corner shape of square hollow sections (SHS), on their buckling behavior. This study investigates the buckling behavior of high-strength cold-formed steel square hollow sections (SHS) under axial compression, focusing on the influence of corner geometry, material properties, and section thickness. Finite element analysis conducted using Abaqus revealed that sharp-cornered sections demonstrate superior buckling resistance and higher ultimate axial loads compared to round-cornered sections, while the latter exhibit better post-buckling ductility. A parametric study highlighted the critical role of section thickness and corner radius in enhancing structural performance, with thicker sections and smaller radii showing increased resistance and reduced slenderness. Comparisons with Eurocode 3 revealed discrepancies, emphasizing the need for updates to account for the behavior of high-strength steel and complex geometries. The findings provide valuable insights for optimizing design practices, ensuring safer and more efficient structures, and advancing guidelines for high-strength cold-formed steel applications
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
冷弯高强度型钢截面的屈曲行为:数值见解和设计意义
冷成型高强度钢(HSS)具有实际优势,如更薄的横截面,降低材料成本。最近的研究表明,这些钢构件可能比以前认为的更有弹性,即使它们不像传统的延性材料那样表现,它们也会产生局部塑性变形,从而提高阻力。然而,由于对HSS冷弯柱屈曲行为的研究不足,设计的复杂性仍然存在。一个尚未被广泛探讨的关键因素是截面几何形状,特别是方形空心截面(SHS)的角形对其屈曲行为的影响。本文研究了高强度冷弯型钢方形空心截面(SHS)在轴向压缩下的屈曲行为,重点研究了角几何形状、材料性能和截面厚度的影响。利用Abaqus进行的有限元分析表明,与圆角截面相比,尖角截面具有更好的抗屈曲能力和更高的极限轴向载荷,而圆角截面具有更好的屈曲后延性。一项参数化研究强调了截面厚度和圆角半径在提高结构性能方面的关键作用,截面越厚,圆角半径越小,阻力越大,长细度越低。与欧洲规范3的比较揭示了差异,强调需要更新以考虑高强度钢和复杂几何形状的行为。这些发现为优化设计实践、确保更安全和更高效的结构以及推进高强度冷弯型钢应用的指导方针提供了有价值的见解
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Structures
Structures Engineering-Architecture
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
17.10%
发文量
1187
期刊介绍: Structures aims to publish internationally-leading research across the full breadth of structural engineering. Papers for Structures are particularly welcome in which high-quality research will benefit from wide readership of academics and practitioners such that not only high citation rates but also tangible industrial-related pathways to impact are achieved.
期刊最新文献
Multi-mode vertical vibration control of bridges under harmonic excitation using a nonlinear energy sink High-fidelity finite element modeling of the progressive collapse of reinforced concrete frame structures caused by truck collisions Seismic fragility analysis of masonry structures based on equivalent diagonal strut model and vector-valued intensity measures Mechanical properties of grade 2060 HSSWs for bridge cables under and after elevated temperatures An efficient regional seismic response analysis method considering building irregularity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1