Preoperative tumour size assessment in patients with early-stage cervical cancer: Final results of the SENTIX study

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Gynecologic oncology Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-11 DOI:10.1016/j.ygyno.2025.04.005
Martina Borčinová , Christhardt Köhler , Kristýna Němejcová , Ignacio Zapardiel , Jaroslav Klát , Filip Frühauf , Vladimír Kalist , Wiktor Szatkowski , Dariusz Wydra , Roman Kocián , Rene Laky , Róbert Tóth , Marcin Misiek , Mikuláš Redecha , Isabel Martin , Frederic Kridelka , Andrea Burgetová , F. Javier Santiago Garcia , Toon Van Gorp , Grzegorz Szewczyk , David Cibula
{"title":"Preoperative tumour size assessment in patients with early-stage cervical cancer: Final results of the SENTIX study","authors":"Martina Borčinová ,&nbsp;Christhardt Köhler ,&nbsp;Kristýna Němejcová ,&nbsp;Ignacio Zapardiel ,&nbsp;Jaroslav Klát ,&nbsp;Filip Frühauf ,&nbsp;Vladimír Kalist ,&nbsp;Wiktor Szatkowski ,&nbsp;Dariusz Wydra ,&nbsp;Roman Kocián ,&nbsp;Rene Laky ,&nbsp;Róbert Tóth ,&nbsp;Marcin Misiek ,&nbsp;Mikuláš Redecha ,&nbsp;Isabel Martin ,&nbsp;Frederic Kridelka ,&nbsp;Andrea Burgetová ,&nbsp;F. Javier Santiago Garcia ,&nbsp;Toon Van Gorp ,&nbsp;Grzegorz Szewczyk ,&nbsp;David Cibula","doi":"10.1016/j.ygyno.2025.04.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Preoperative tumour size is a key prognostic marker in tailoring surgical treatment in early-stage cervical cancer. This post-hoc analysis assessed the accuracy of preoperative tumour size evaluation via imaging, utilizing data from the prospective, international, multicentre SENTIX study that evaluated safety of sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy without pelvic lymph node dissection in patients with early-stage cervical cancer.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Between 05/2016–09/2020, forty-seven sites across 18 countries enrolled cervical cancer patients (FIGO2018 stages 1A1/lymphovascular-space-invasion-positive to 1B2). Preoperative staging included pelvic MRI or ultrasound as mandatory imaging modalities. All patients underwent primary surgical treatment. Pathological assessment of surgical specimens served as reference standard for evaluating the accuracy of preoperative assessments.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among the 680 included patients, although the mean tumour size discrepancy between preoperative/pathological assessments was only 1.24 ± 8.891 mm, postoperative pT stage was upgraded in 187 (27.5 %) and downgraded in 74 (10.9 %) patients. Discrepancy of ≥10 mm was observed among 155 (22.8 %) patients across all stages, with underestimation in 105 (15.4 %), overestimation in 50 (7.4 %), and a positive correlation (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.0001) between the pathological tumour size and the discrepancy in size assessment. If a maximum 2 cm tumour size threshold were applied to guide the decision between simple and radical hysterectomy, underestimation would result in inadequate surgical management for 9.0 % of patients, whereas overestimation would lead to unnecessarily radical procedures in 5.1 % of cases.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The study highlights, that even with the use of modern imaging in preoperative staging, inaccuracies in tumour size assessment remain a common cause of up−/down-staging after surgery resulting in potential inappropriate planning of surgery, and thus in procedure that is either excessively or insufficiently radical.</div><div>Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02494063.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12853,"journal":{"name":"Gynecologic oncology","volume":"196 ","pages":"Pages 160-167"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gynecologic oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0090825825001635","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Preoperative tumour size is a key prognostic marker in tailoring surgical treatment in early-stage cervical cancer. This post-hoc analysis assessed the accuracy of preoperative tumour size evaluation via imaging, utilizing data from the prospective, international, multicentre SENTIX study that evaluated safety of sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy without pelvic lymph node dissection in patients with early-stage cervical cancer.

Methods

Between 05/2016–09/2020, forty-seven sites across 18 countries enrolled cervical cancer patients (FIGO2018 stages 1A1/lymphovascular-space-invasion-positive to 1B2). Preoperative staging included pelvic MRI or ultrasound as mandatory imaging modalities. All patients underwent primary surgical treatment. Pathological assessment of surgical specimens served as reference standard for evaluating the accuracy of preoperative assessments.

Results

Among the 680 included patients, although the mean tumour size discrepancy between preoperative/pathological assessments was only 1.24 ± 8.891 mm, postoperative pT stage was upgraded in 187 (27.5 %) and downgraded in 74 (10.9 %) patients. Discrepancy of ≥10 mm was observed among 155 (22.8 %) patients across all stages, with underestimation in 105 (15.4 %), overestimation in 50 (7.4 %), and a positive correlation (P < 0.0001) between the pathological tumour size and the discrepancy in size assessment. If a maximum 2 cm tumour size threshold were applied to guide the decision between simple and radical hysterectomy, underestimation would result in inadequate surgical management for 9.0 % of patients, whereas overestimation would lead to unnecessarily radical procedures in 5.1 % of cases.

Conclusions

The study highlights, that even with the use of modern imaging in preoperative staging, inaccuracies in tumour size assessment remain a common cause of up−/down-staging after surgery resulting in potential inappropriate planning of surgery, and thus in procedure that is either excessively or insufficiently radical.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02494063.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
早期宫颈癌患者术前肿瘤大小评估:SENTIX研究的最终结果
背景:术前肿瘤大小是早期宫颈癌手术治疗的关键预后指标。这项事后分析评估了通过影像学评估术前肿瘤大小的准确性,利用了前瞻性、国际、多中心SENTIX研究的数据,该研究评估了早期宫颈癌患者前哨淋巴结(SLN)活检而不进行盆腔淋巴结清扫的安全性。方法2016年5月至2020年9月,在18个国家的47个地点招募了宫颈癌患者(FIGO2018期1A1/淋巴血管空间浸润阳性至1B2)。术前分期包括盆腔MRI或超声作为强制性成像方式。所有患者均接受初步手术治疗。手术标本病理评估作为术前评估准确性的参考标准。结果在680例纳入的患者中,尽管术前/病理评估的平均肿瘤大小差异仅为1.24±8.891 mm,但术后pT分期升级的患者187例(27.5%),降级的患者74例(10.9%)。所有分期155例(22.8%)患者的差异≥10 mm,其中低估105例(15.4%),高估50例(7.4%),呈正相关(P <;0.0001),病理肿瘤大小与大小评估差异。如果使用最大2cm肿瘤大小阈值来指导简单和根治性子宫切除术之间的决定,则9.0%的患者低估会导致手术治疗不充分,而高估会导致5.1%的病例不必要的根治性手术。结论:该研究强调,即使在术前分期中使用现代影像学,肿瘤大小评估的不准确性仍然是术后分期上升/下降的常见原因,导致潜在的不适当的手术计划,从而导致手术过度或不够彻底。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02494063。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Gynecologic oncology
Gynecologic oncology 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
6.40%
发文量
1062
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: Gynecologic Oncology, an international journal, is devoted to the publication of clinical and investigative articles that concern tumors of the female reproductive tract. Investigations relating to the etiology, diagnosis, and treatment of female cancers, as well as research from any of the disciplines related to this field of interest, are published. Research Areas Include: • Cell and molecular biology • Chemotherapy • Cytology • Endocrinology • Epidemiology • Genetics • Gynecologic surgery • Immunology • Pathology • Radiotherapy
期刊最新文献
Peritoneal cancer risk after risk reducing salpingo-oophorectomy, impact of mutational status and STIC lesions Noncompete agreements in job contracts: Knowledge and opinion of practicing gynecologic oncologist members of Society of Gynecologic Oncology Progestin and vitamin D synergistically inhibit fallopian tube carcinogenesis The role of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in newly diagnosed and recurrent ovarian cancer: A time-to-event meta-analysis of randomized trials Rectosigmoidectomy versus pelvic peritonectomy in the management of seromuscular involvement of superficial rectal wall tumors in advanced-stage ovarian cancer at complete interval cytoreductive surgery
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1