Soybean protein isolate versus sheep whey protein: A detailed comparison of their chemical composition, gastrointestinal digestion and fermentation properties

IF 9.8 1区 农林科学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, APPLIED Food Chemistry Pub Date : 2025-04-10 DOI:10.1016/j.foodchem.2025.144239
Haoyan Zhu , Xinwei Tian , Zhengwei Tan , Xingbin Yang , Yan Zhao
{"title":"Soybean protein isolate versus sheep whey protein: A detailed comparison of their chemical composition, gastrointestinal digestion and fermentation properties","authors":"Haoyan Zhu ,&nbsp;Xinwei Tian ,&nbsp;Zhengwei Tan ,&nbsp;Xingbin Yang ,&nbsp;Yan Zhao","doi":"10.1016/j.foodchem.2025.144239","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Plant proteins are emerging as alternatives to animal proteins. This study compared the physicochemical properties and nutritional characteristics of soybean protein isolate (SPI) and sheep whey protein (SWP), which is gaining recognition for its nutritional benefits. SWP exhibited higher amino acid content, larger particle size, increased turbidity, and superior foaming and emulsification capacities compared to SPI (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.05). In contrast, SPI demonstrated better emulsification stability. <em>In vitro</em>, gastrointestinal digestion showed that SPI achieved a higher degree of hydrolysis in both gastric and intestinal phases, although SWP had a faster initial hydrolysis rate. During gut microbiota fermentation, SWP produced significantly higher levels of short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) than SPI (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.05). Non-targeted metabolomics revealed distinct metabolic differences, particularly in amino acid metabolism, bile acid synthesis, and hormone biosynthesis. These findings suggest SWP is suitable for nutritional supplementation, while SPI is better for dairy-based alternatives.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":318,"journal":{"name":"Food Chemistry","volume":"483 ","pages":"Article 144239"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308814625014906","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Plant proteins are emerging as alternatives to animal proteins. This study compared the physicochemical properties and nutritional characteristics of soybean protein isolate (SPI) and sheep whey protein (SWP), which is gaining recognition for its nutritional benefits. SWP exhibited higher amino acid content, larger particle size, increased turbidity, and superior foaming and emulsification capacities compared to SPI (p < 0.05). In contrast, SPI demonstrated better emulsification stability. In vitro, gastrointestinal digestion showed that SPI achieved a higher degree of hydrolysis in both gastric and intestinal phases, although SWP had a faster initial hydrolysis rate. During gut microbiota fermentation, SWP produced significantly higher levels of short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) than SPI (p < 0.05). Non-targeted metabolomics revealed distinct metabolic differences, particularly in amino acid metabolism, bile acid synthesis, and hormone biosynthesis. These findings suggest SWP is suitable for nutritional supplementation, while SPI is better for dairy-based alternatives.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大豆分离蛋白与羊乳清蛋白:它们的化学成分、胃肠道消化和发酵特性的详细比较
植物蛋白正在成为动物蛋白的替代品。本研究比较了大豆分离蛋白(SPI)和绵羊乳清蛋白(SWP)的理化性质和营养特性。与 SPI 相比,SWP 表现出更高的氨基酸含量、更大的粒度、更高的浑浊度以及更强的发泡和乳化能力(p < 0.05)。相比之下,SPI 的乳化稳定性更好。体外胃肠道消化显示,SPI 在胃和肠道阶段都实现了更高程度的水解,尽管 SWP 的初始水解速度更快。在肠道微生物群发酵过程中,SWP 产生的短链脂肪酸 (SCFA) 水平明显高于 SPI(p < 0.05)。非靶向代谢组学揭示了明显的代谢差异,尤其是在氨基酸代谢、胆汁酸合成和激素生物合成方面。这些研究结果表明,SWP 适合作为营养补充剂,而 SPI 则更适合作为以乳制品为基础的替代品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Food Chemistry
Food Chemistry 工程技术-食品科技
CiteScore
16.30
自引率
10.20%
发文量
3130
审稿时长
122 days
期刊介绍: Food Chemistry publishes original research papers dealing with the advancement of the chemistry and biochemistry of foods or the analytical methods/ approach used. All papers should focus on the novelty of the research carried out.
期刊最新文献
Residual Ofloxacin detection in food via paper-based and solution platforms using a dual-emissive MOF with wide-range triple-color emission. Kapok-fiber-supported liquid–liquid extraction enables rapid and convenient determination of five phenoxycarboxylic acid herbicide residues in beverages and oral liquids Effect of roasting on the chemical profiles of white and black sesame seeds during accelerated storage Development of a targeted mass spectrometry method for porcine pancreas marker peptides detection in protein hydrolysates Construction of correlation networks and metabolic pathways reveals the self-gel and flavor formation mechanisms of silver carp surimi during natural fermentation based on volatile and non-volatile metabonomics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1