How can we best support insulin self-titration in type 2 diabetes patients: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

IF 3.4 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Diabetes & Metabolic Syndrome-Clinical Research & Reviews Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-27 DOI:10.1016/j.dsx.2025.103221
Panitan Pitak , Kansak Boonpattharatthiti , Anjana Fuangchan , Ines Krass , Teerapon Dhippayom
{"title":"How can we best support insulin self-titration in type 2 diabetes patients: A systematic review and network meta-analysis","authors":"Panitan Pitak ,&nbsp;Kansak Boonpattharatthiti ,&nbsp;Anjana Fuangchan ,&nbsp;Ines Krass ,&nbsp;Teerapon Dhippayom","doi":"10.1016/j.dsx.2025.103221","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>The efficacy of insulin self-titration in type 2 diabetes (T2D) varies by support strategy. This study aimed to identify the effects of different insulin self-titration support strategies in patients with T2D.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>PubMed, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and EBSCO Open Dissertations were searched from inception to January 2023. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on T2D patients that reported HbA1c reduction of insulin self-titration supports were included. The interventions were classified based on the following components: dosage guidance (DG), non-dosage guidance (NDG) and empowerment. The pooled estimates were presented as mean differences (MDs) and risk ratios (RRs) with 95 % confidence interval (CI) using a random-effects model. The certainty of evidence was evaluated utilizing the CINeMA online platform.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Seventeen RCTs (13,528 participants) were included. Compared with usual care (UC), the greatest reduction in HbA1c was observed in patients receiving dosage guidance/Empowerment (MD −1.20; 95 %CI: −2.33,−0.07), with moderate certainty of evidence. Lesser HbA1c reduction, MD [95 % CI], were observed in other support strategies when compared with usual care as follows: −0.97 [−1.24,−0.69] in non-dosage guidance/Empowerment, −0.42 [−0.60,−0.24] in dosage guidance, and −0.31 [−0.58,−0.03] in non-dosage guidance. The risk of severe hypoglycemia was not significantly difference among all support strategies, with very low certainty.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Incorporating patient empowerment into insulin self-titration support strategy, either dosage or non-dosage guidance, is more effective in lowering HbA1c.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48252,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes & Metabolic Syndrome-Clinical Research & Reviews","volume":"19 3","pages":"Article 103221"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes & Metabolic Syndrome-Clinical Research & Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1871402125000384","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

The efficacy of insulin self-titration in type 2 diabetes (T2D) varies by support strategy. This study aimed to identify the effects of different insulin self-titration support strategies in patients with T2D.

Methods

PubMed, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and EBSCO Open Dissertations were searched from inception to January 2023. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on T2D patients that reported HbA1c reduction of insulin self-titration supports were included. The interventions were classified based on the following components: dosage guidance (DG), non-dosage guidance (NDG) and empowerment. The pooled estimates were presented as mean differences (MDs) and risk ratios (RRs) with 95 % confidence interval (CI) using a random-effects model. The certainty of evidence was evaluated utilizing the CINeMA online platform.

Results

Seventeen RCTs (13,528 participants) were included. Compared with usual care (UC), the greatest reduction in HbA1c was observed in patients receiving dosage guidance/Empowerment (MD −1.20; 95 %CI: −2.33,−0.07), with moderate certainty of evidence. Lesser HbA1c reduction, MD [95 % CI], were observed in other support strategies when compared with usual care as follows: −0.97 [−1.24,−0.69] in non-dosage guidance/Empowerment, −0.42 [−0.60,−0.24] in dosage guidance, and −0.31 [−0.58,−0.03] in non-dosage guidance. The risk of severe hypoglycemia was not significantly difference among all support strategies, with very low certainty.

Conclusions

Incorporating patient empowerment into insulin self-titration support strategy, either dosage or non-dosage guidance, is more effective in lowering HbA1c.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
我们如何才能最好地支持2型糖尿病患者的胰岛素自我滴定:一项系统综述和网络荟萃分析
胰岛素自我滴定治疗2型糖尿病(T2D)的疗效因支持策略而异。本研究旨在确定不同胰岛素自我滴定支持策略对t2dm患者的影响。方法检索spubmed、EMBASE、CENTRAL和EBSCO自建校至2023年1月的开放论文。随机对照试验(RCTs)中t2dm患者报告HbA1c降低胰岛素自我滴定支持。干预措施按剂量指导(DG)、非剂量指导(NDG)和授权(empowerment)三部分进行分类。使用随机效应模型,汇总估计以95%置信区间(CI)的平均差异(md)和风险比(rr)表示。利用CINeMA在线平台评估证据的确定性。结果纳入17项随机对照试验(rct),共13528名受试者。与常规护理(UC)相比,接受剂量指导/授权的患者HbA1c降低幅度最大(MD - 1.20;95% CI:−2.33,−0.07),证据确定性中等。与常规护理相比,其他支持策略的HbA1c降低幅度较小,MD [95% CI]如下:非剂量指导/赋权组为- 0.97[- 1.24,- 0.69],剂量指导组为- 0.42[- 0.60,- 0.24],非剂量指导组为- 0.31[- 0.58,- 0.03]。严重低血糖的风险在各支持策略间无显著差异,确定性极低。结论将患者授权纳入胰岛素自我滴定支持策略,无论是剂量指导还是非剂量指导,都能更有效地降低HbA1c。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
22.90
自引率
2.00%
发文量
248
审稿时长
51 days
期刊介绍: Diabetes and Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical Research and Reviews is the official journal of DiabetesIndia. It aims to provide a global platform for healthcare professionals, diabetes educators, and other stakeholders to submit their research on diabetes care. Types of Publications: Diabetes and Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical Research and Reviews publishes peer-reviewed original articles, reviews, short communications, case reports, letters to the Editor, and expert comments. Reviews and mini-reviews are particularly welcomed for areas within endocrinology undergoing rapid changes.
期刊最新文献
Abdominal obesity (Waist Circumference/Waist Circumference-to-Height Ratio) as a new vital sign in Asian Indians: The most dangerous fat we rarely measure Impact of early life exposure to active play and movement on health and wellbeing across the lifespan: A narrative review of RCTs from 2020-2025 Editorial Board Effectiveness of alpha lipoic acid supplementation on biochemical, clinical, and inflammatory parameters in patients with diabetic polyneuropathy: A systematic review and meta-analysis Global assessment of insulin and oral hypoglycaemic agent accessibility and affordability: A cross-sectional survey of international diabetes federation member countries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1