Nocebo effect in inhaler use: Patients' beliefs and treatment adherence

IF 1.8 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-08 DOI:10.1016/j.rcsop.2025.100602
Eduardo Garcia-Pachon , María J. Soler-Sempere , Sandra Ruiz-Alcaraz , Ana Ibarra-Macia , Marina Belendez-Vazquez
{"title":"Nocebo effect in inhaler use: Patients' beliefs and treatment adherence","authors":"Eduardo Garcia-Pachon ,&nbsp;María J. Soler-Sempere ,&nbsp;Sandra Ruiz-Alcaraz ,&nbsp;Ana Ibarra-Macia ,&nbsp;Marina Belendez-Vazquez","doi":"10.1016/j.rcsop.2025.100602","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The nocebo effect refers to the experience of nonspecific symptoms attributed to medical treatments, which cannot be explained by the pharmacological effects of the medication. This phenomenon, where symptoms are incorrectly linked to a treatment, can have significant implications for treatment adherence and may lead to increased patient demand for medical assistance.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To ascertain the frequency and types of nocebo effects attributed to inhaler use, along with the associated factors.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>An interview was conducted to inquire about adverse effects attributed to inhalers. Additionally, questionnaires on beliefs about medications, general and specific to inhalers, and perceived sensitivity to medications scale were administered. Adherence to inhaled therapy was established using the inhaler adherence test and the electronic prescription refill rate at the pharmacy.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 134 patients were included, among whom 21 (16 %) attributed symptoms to inhalers that were considered to be due to the nocebo effect. Patients experiencing nocebo-related symptoms exhibited greater concerns about using inhalers, heightened sensitivity to drug effects, and lower therapeutic adherence.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>A significant proportion of patients receiving inhaler therapy associate negative symptoms that are not reasonably attributable to the inhalers themselves. Patients prone to attributing nonspecific symptoms to inhalers differ in their beliefs about medications and exhibit lower therapeutic adherence compared to others.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73003,"journal":{"name":"Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy","volume":"18 ","pages":"Article 100602"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667276625000435","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The nocebo effect refers to the experience of nonspecific symptoms attributed to medical treatments, which cannot be explained by the pharmacological effects of the medication. This phenomenon, where symptoms are incorrectly linked to a treatment, can have significant implications for treatment adherence and may lead to increased patient demand for medical assistance.

Objective

To ascertain the frequency and types of nocebo effects attributed to inhaler use, along with the associated factors.

Methods

An interview was conducted to inquire about adverse effects attributed to inhalers. Additionally, questionnaires on beliefs about medications, general and specific to inhalers, and perceived sensitivity to medications scale were administered. Adherence to inhaled therapy was established using the inhaler adherence test and the electronic prescription refill rate at the pharmacy.

Results

A total of 134 patients were included, among whom 21 (16 %) attributed symptoms to inhalers that were considered to be due to the nocebo effect. Patients experiencing nocebo-related symptoms exhibited greater concerns about using inhalers, heightened sensitivity to drug effects, and lower therapeutic adherence.

Conclusions

A significant proportion of patients receiving inhaler therapy associate negative symptoms that are not reasonably attributable to the inhalers themselves. Patients prone to attributing nonspecific symptoms to inhalers differ in their beliefs about medications and exhibit lower therapeutic adherence compared to others.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
吸入器使用中的反安慰剂效应:患者的信念和治疗依从性
反安慰剂效应是指由于药物治疗而产生的非特异性症状,这些症状不能用药物的药理作用来解释。这种将症状与治疗错误地联系起来的现象可能对治疗依从性产生重大影响,并可能导致患者对医疗援助的需求增加。目的确定吸入器使用引起的反安慰剂效应的频率和类型,以及相关因素。方法对吸入器不良反应进行问卷调查。此外,对吸入器的一般和特定药物的信念以及对药物量表的感知敏感性进行问卷调查。通过吸入器依从性测试和药房的电子处方补充率来确定吸入治疗的依从性。结果共纳入134例患者,其中21例(16%)将症状归因于吸入器,被认为是由于反安慰剂效应引起的。出现反安慰剂相关症状的患者对使用吸入器表现出更大的担忧,对药物作用更敏感,治疗依从性更低。结论接受吸入器治疗的患者中有相当一部分出现了不能合理归因于吸入器本身的阴性症状。倾向于将非特异性症状归因于吸入器的患者对药物的看法不同,并且与其他人相比,对治疗的依从性较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
103 days
期刊最新文献
Potential clinical impact of pharmaceutical interventions in an interprofessional medication management program Pharmacy robberies and occupational safety risks: A national cross-sectional study of community pharmacies Understanding the mediating role of pharmaceutical policymaking attitudes between personal attributes and public service motivation Identifying and measuring important outcomes for evaluating the impact of pharmacist prescribing in Ireland: A modified Delphi study Assessing safety trends of withdrawn medications: A data-driven pharmacovigilance approach using growth models
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1