Using a novel “Perceived Self-Group Hierarchy” measure to predict White Americans’ health via feelings of “falling behind”

IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Social Science & Medicine Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-10 DOI:10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118061
Jazmin L. Brown-Iannuzzi , Erin Cooley , Dylan Vlasak , Jaclyn A. Lisnek , Ryan F. Lei , Camryn Yeager , Nicholas Elacqua
{"title":"Using a novel “Perceived Self-Group Hierarchy” measure to predict White Americans’ health via feelings of “falling behind”","authors":"Jazmin L. Brown-Iannuzzi ,&nbsp;Erin Cooley ,&nbsp;Dylan Vlasak ,&nbsp;Jaclyn A. Lisnek ,&nbsp;Ryan F. Lei ,&nbsp;Camryn Yeager ,&nbsp;Nicholas Elacqua","doi":"10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Previous research finds that White Americans tend to perceive “most White people” to be high-status and see themselves as falling behind their racial group (Cooley et al., 2021). These feelings of low within-group status predict fewer positive emotions which, in turn, predict worse health. However, this previous work is limited by its use of two separate status measures (i.e., “self” and “group”) which are used to infer within-group comparisons via difference scores. To address this limitation, we propose a Perceived Self-Group Hierarchy (PSGH) measure that directly assesses perceptions of <em>within</em>-group status, while also capturing perceptions of <em>between</em>-group status. Using samples of non-Hispanic White Americans with representative quota sampling (<em>N</em><sub>Total</sub> = 1600), we demonstrate that our new measure provides better criterion validity and incremental validity over prior measurement strategies when predicting health (Study 1). Moreover, when combined with latent profile analysis, our measure allows researchers to ask more nuanced questions regarding subjective status and health (Study 2).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49122,"journal":{"name":"Social Science & Medicine","volume":"374 ","pages":"Article 118061"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Science & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953625003910","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Previous research finds that White Americans tend to perceive “most White people” to be high-status and see themselves as falling behind their racial group (Cooley et al., 2021). These feelings of low within-group status predict fewer positive emotions which, in turn, predict worse health. However, this previous work is limited by its use of two separate status measures (i.e., “self” and “group”) which are used to infer within-group comparisons via difference scores. To address this limitation, we propose a Perceived Self-Group Hierarchy (PSGH) measure that directly assesses perceptions of within-group status, while also capturing perceptions of between-group status. Using samples of non-Hispanic White Americans with representative quota sampling (NTotal = 1600), we demonstrate that our new measure provides better criterion validity and incremental validity over prior measurement strategies when predicting health (Study 1). Moreover, when combined with latent profile analysis, our measure allows researchers to ask more nuanced questions regarding subjective status and health (Study 2).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用一种新颖的“感知自我群体等级”测量方法,通过“落后”的感觉来预测美国白人的健康状况
先前的研究发现,美国白人倾向于认为“大多数白人”地位高,并认为自己落后于他们的种族群体(Cooley et al., 2021)。这种在群体中地位低下的感觉预示着更少的积极情绪,而积极情绪反过来又预示着更糟糕的健康状况。然而,这项先前的工作受到其使用两个单独的状态测量(即“自我”和“群体”)的限制,这两个状态测量用于通过差异分数推断群体内的比较。为了解决这一限制,我们提出了一种感知自我群体层次(PSGH)测量方法,该方法直接评估群体内地位的感知,同时也捕捉群体间地位的感知。使用具有代表性配额抽样的非西班牙裔美国白人样本(NTotal = 1600),我们证明,在预测健康时,我们的新测量方法比先前的测量策略提供了更好的标准效度和增量效度(研究1)。此外,当与潜在剖面分析相结合时,我们的测量方法允许研究人员提出有关主观状态和健康的更细微的问题(研究2)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Social Science & Medicine
Social Science & Medicine PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
5.60%
发文量
762
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Social Science & Medicine provides an international and interdisciplinary forum for the dissemination of social science research on health. We publish original research articles (both empirical and theoretical), reviews, position papers and commentaries on health issues, to inform current research, policy and practice in all areas of common interest to social scientists, health practitioners, and policy makers. The journal publishes material relevant to any aspect of health from a wide range of social science disciplines (anthropology, economics, epidemiology, geography, policy, psychology, and sociology), and material relevant to the social sciences from any of the professions concerned with physical and mental health, health care, clinical practice, and health policy and organization. We encourage material which is of general interest to an international readership.
期刊最新文献
What counts as need? A qualitative study exploring perceptions of sexual and reproductive health in humanitarian settings Unpacking sociopolitical determinants of suicide in networked movements: Exposure to protest suicides in Hong Kong Advancing the concept of community positive health through participatory research in marginalized communities in Kenya “I thought I could postpartum-proof my experience”: Embodying, resisting, and negotiating medicalization online Synergies of participatory mapping and health geography: A scoping review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1