Reducing Hospitalisations With a Skin and Soft Tissue Infection Clinic

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of evaluation in clinical practice Pub Date : 2025-04-16 DOI:10.1111/jep.70082
Tarek Abdelhalim, Naudea Mair, Sherele McGhie, Alon Vaisman, Thomas E. MacMillan
{"title":"Reducing Hospitalisations With a Skin and Soft Tissue Infection Clinic","authors":"Tarek Abdelhalim,&nbsp;Naudea Mair,&nbsp;Sherele McGhie,&nbsp;Alon Vaisman,&nbsp;Thomas E. MacMillan","doi":"10.1111/jep.70082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Rationale</h3>\n \n <p>Patients with skin and soft tissue infection are often admitted to hospital despite compelling evidence that many can be managed safely as outpatients. This quality improvement study reports the outcomes of an outpatient skin and soft tissue infection programme implemented at an academic acute-care hospital in Toronto, Canada.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The intervention was an outpatient care pathway for patients with suspected skin and soft tissue infection who may otherwise have required admission to hospital. The programme was implemented within the existing general internal medicine outpatient clinic and primarily involved the addition of part-time advanced practice wound care nurses. The main outcome was the number of hospital inpatient days for skin and soft tissue infection. Data were analysed for 4 years pre-intervention (June 2016–May 2020) and 2 years post-intervention (June 2020–May 2022). Another acute-care hospital in the same network which did not undergo the intervention was included as a control.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>During the 2-year post-intervention period there were 465 clinic visits with the programme (mean of 19/month). The median number of inpatient days for skin and soft tissue infection decreased from 224 per month before the intervention to 148 per month after the intervention (a reduction of 34%). There was no reduction in inpatient days for skin and soft tissue infection at the control site or among all diagnoses at the intervention site.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The implementation of an outpatient skin and soft tissue infection programme was associated with a sustained 34% reduction in inpatient days for skin and soft tissue infection. This study demonstrates the benefits of enhancing an existing outpatient internal medicine clinic through the creation of a streamlined care pathway and adding interdisciplinary expertise.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15997,"journal":{"name":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","volume":"31 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jep.70082","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jep.70082","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rationale

Patients with skin and soft tissue infection are often admitted to hospital despite compelling evidence that many can be managed safely as outpatients. This quality improvement study reports the outcomes of an outpatient skin and soft tissue infection programme implemented at an academic acute-care hospital in Toronto, Canada.

Methods

The intervention was an outpatient care pathway for patients with suspected skin and soft tissue infection who may otherwise have required admission to hospital. The programme was implemented within the existing general internal medicine outpatient clinic and primarily involved the addition of part-time advanced practice wound care nurses. The main outcome was the number of hospital inpatient days for skin and soft tissue infection. Data were analysed for 4 years pre-intervention (June 2016–May 2020) and 2 years post-intervention (June 2020–May 2022). Another acute-care hospital in the same network which did not undergo the intervention was included as a control.

Results

During the 2-year post-intervention period there were 465 clinic visits with the programme (mean of 19/month). The median number of inpatient days for skin and soft tissue infection decreased from 224 per month before the intervention to 148 per month after the intervention (a reduction of 34%). There was no reduction in inpatient days for skin and soft tissue infection at the control site or among all diagnoses at the intervention site.

Conclusions

The implementation of an outpatient skin and soft tissue infection programme was associated with a sustained 34% reduction in inpatient days for skin and soft tissue infection. This study demonstrates the benefits of enhancing an existing outpatient internal medicine clinic through the creation of a streamlined care pathway and adding interdisciplinary expertise.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
减少皮肤和软组织感染诊所的住院率
尽管有令人信服的证据表明,许多皮肤和软组织感染的患者可以作为门诊患者进行安全管理,但仍经常入院。本质量改进研究报告了在加拿大多伦多的一家学术急症医院实施的门诊皮肤和软组织感染方案的结果。方法对疑似皮肤和软组织感染的患者采取门诊护理途径,否则可能需要住院治疗。该方案是在现有的普通内科门诊诊所内实施的,主要涉及增加兼职高级伤口护理护士。主要观察指标为皮肤和软组织感染的住院天数。分析干预前4年(2016年6月- 2020年5月)和干预后2年(2020年6月- 2022年5月)的数据。同一网络中另一家未进行干预的急性护理医院被纳入对照组。结果在干预后的2年时间里,有465次就诊(平均19次/月)。皮肤和软组织感染的住院天数中位数从干预前的每月224天减少到干预后的每月148天(减少34%)。对照组和所有诊断为皮肤和软组织感染的干预组的住院天数均未减少。结论:门诊皮肤和软组织感染方案的实施与皮肤和软组织感染住院天数持续减少34%有关。本研究展示了通过创建简化的护理途径和增加跨学科专业知识来增强现有门诊内科诊所的好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
4.20%
发文量
143
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice aims to promote the evaluation and development of clinical practice across medicine, nursing and the allied health professions. All aspects of health services research and public health policy analysis and debate are of interest to the Journal whether studied from a population-based or individual patient-centred perspective. Of particular interest to the Journal are submissions on all aspects of clinical effectiveness and efficiency including evidence-based medicine, clinical practice guidelines, clinical decision making, clinical services organisation, implementation and delivery, health economic evaluation, health process and outcome measurement and new or improved methods (conceptual and statistical) for systematic inquiry into clinical practice. Papers may take a classical quantitative or qualitative approach to investigation (or may utilise both techniques) or may take the form of learned essays, structured/systematic reviews and critiques.
期刊最新文献
Psychological Support and Single-Session Interventions for Parents of Children With Long-Term Health Conditions: A Qualitative Service Evaluation The Impact of Polypharmacy and Potentially Inappropriate Medications on Intrinsic Capacity Decline in Community-Dwelling Older Adults The Demand and Influencing Factors of Health Management for Elderly Patients With Chronic Diseases in China Evaluation of Nurse-Patient Language Barrier Issues: A Qualitative Study on the Views of Psychiatric Clinic Nurses Mapping the Quality and Standardization of Methodological Reports in POCUS Research: A Scoping Review Protocol
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1