Pulmonary complications after intrathecal morphine administration: a systematic review and meta-analysis with meta-regression and trial sequential analysis

IF 6.9 1区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY Anaesthesia Pub Date : 2025-04-16 DOI:10.1111/anae.16606
Kariem El-Boghdadly, Yves Renard, Jean-Benoit Rossel, Eleni Moka, Thomas Volk, Narinder Rawal, Cécile Jaques, Marta Szyszko, Eric Albrecht
{"title":"Pulmonary complications after intrathecal morphine administration: a systematic review and meta-analysis with meta-regression and trial sequential analysis","authors":"Kariem El-Boghdadly,&nbsp;Yves Renard,&nbsp;Jean-Benoit Rossel,&nbsp;Eleni Moka,&nbsp;Thomas Volk,&nbsp;Narinder Rawal,&nbsp;Cécile Jaques,&nbsp;Marta Szyszko,&nbsp;Eric Albrecht","doi":"10.1111/anae.16606","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Intrathecal morphine provides effective postoperative analgesia, but there are concerns about potential pulmonary complications influencing peri-operative management. We aimed to determine whether there is an association between intrathecal morphine administration and pulmonary complications after non-obstetric surgery. We also aimed to determine whether there was a dose-dependent effect on pulmonary complications.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We searched the literature systematically for randomised controlled trials comparing intrathecal morphine vs. control in patients undergoing any type of non-obstetric surgery under general or spinal anaesthesia. Primary outcomes were rates of postoperative sedation, respiratory depression and hypoxaemia. We performed a meta-analysis and meta-regression for each of our outcomes of interest and conducted trial sequential analysis to assess whether the required information size was achieved.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>We included 127 trials (7388 patients). Rates of sedation and hypoxaemia were not increased significantly in patients receiving intrathecal morphine (odds ratio 1.00, 95%CI 0.78–1.28, p = 0.98, moderate quality evidence; and 1.22, 95%CI 0.84–1.79, p = 0.30, moderate quality evidence, respectively). There were more episodes of respiratory depression in patients receiving intrathecal morphine than control (odds ratio 1.78, 95%CI 1.19–2.67, p = 0.005, very low-quality evidence), which was no longer significant when morphine doses &gt; 500 μg were not included (odds ratio1.49, 95%CI 0.99–2.23, p = 0.06). Meta-regression revealed associations between dose and rate of sedation, respiratory depression and hypoxaemia, but when doses of &gt; 500 μg were not included, these associations did not persist. Trial sequential analyses suggest that further data may still be required for all outcomes, but statistical significance was reached for respiratory depression.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Discussion</h3>\n \n <p>There is moderate evidence that intrathecal morphine does not increase rates of sedation or hypoxaemia after non-obstetric surgery. There is very low-quality evidence that intrathecal morphine might increase the rate of respiratory depression.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":7742,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesia","volume":"80 8","pages":"959-972"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://associationofanaesthetists-publications.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/anae.16606","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Intrathecal morphine provides effective postoperative analgesia, but there are concerns about potential pulmonary complications influencing peri-operative management. We aimed to determine whether there is an association between intrathecal morphine administration and pulmonary complications after non-obstetric surgery. We also aimed to determine whether there was a dose-dependent effect on pulmonary complications.

Methods

We searched the literature systematically for randomised controlled trials comparing intrathecal morphine vs. control in patients undergoing any type of non-obstetric surgery under general or spinal anaesthesia. Primary outcomes were rates of postoperative sedation, respiratory depression and hypoxaemia. We performed a meta-analysis and meta-regression for each of our outcomes of interest and conducted trial sequential analysis to assess whether the required information size was achieved.

Results

We included 127 trials (7388 patients). Rates of sedation and hypoxaemia were not increased significantly in patients receiving intrathecal morphine (odds ratio 1.00, 95%CI 0.78–1.28, p = 0.98, moderate quality evidence; and 1.22, 95%CI 0.84–1.79, p = 0.30, moderate quality evidence, respectively). There were more episodes of respiratory depression in patients receiving intrathecal morphine than control (odds ratio 1.78, 95%CI 1.19–2.67, p = 0.005, very low-quality evidence), which was no longer significant when morphine doses > 500 μg were not included (odds ratio1.49, 95%CI 0.99–2.23, p = 0.06). Meta-regression revealed associations between dose and rate of sedation, respiratory depression and hypoxaemia, but when doses of > 500 μg were not included, these associations did not persist. Trial sequential analyses suggest that further data may still be required for all outcomes, but statistical significance was reached for respiratory depression.

Discussion

There is moderate evidence that intrathecal morphine does not increase rates of sedation or hypoxaemia after non-obstetric surgery. There is very low-quality evidence that intrathecal morphine might increase the rate of respiratory depression.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
鞘内注射吗啡后的肺部并发症:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析,包括荟萃回归和试验序列分析
鞘内吗啡可提供有效的术后镇痛,但人们担心潜在的肺部并发症会影响围手术期的管理。我们旨在确定鞘内吗啡给药与非产科手术后肺部并发症之间是否存在关联。我们还旨在确定肺部并发症是否与剂量有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Anaesthesia
Anaesthesia 医学-麻醉学
CiteScore
21.20
自引率
9.30%
发文量
300
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The official journal of the Association of Anaesthetists is Anaesthesia. It is a comprehensive international publication that covers a wide range of topics. The journal focuses on general and regional anaesthesia, as well as intensive care and pain therapy. It includes original articles that have undergone peer review, covering all aspects of these fields, including research on equipment.
期刊最新文献
Conscious sedation vs. general anaesthesia for the peri-operative management of patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a reply. Interpreting the afternoon disadvantage: accounting for mediation, weighting and secular trends: a reply. Chronic pain after day-case surgery: the next challenge in the prevention of chronic post-surgical pain. Patient-reported outcomes, postoperative pain and pain relief after day-case surgery (POPPY): baseline data from day surgery practice in the UK. Patient-reported outcomes, postoperative pain and pain relief after day-case surgery (POPPY): chronic post-surgical pain prevalence and associations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1