Green Hydrogen Economy: Scenarios versus Technologies

IF 5.3 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS Energy & Fuels Pub Date : 2025-04-07 DOI:10.1021/acs.energyfuels.5c01181
Hua Fan, Fengwang Li and Aoni Xu*, 
{"title":"Green Hydrogen Economy: Scenarios versus Technologies","authors":"Hua Fan,&nbsp;Fengwang Li and Aoni Xu*,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acs.energyfuels.5c01181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Green hydrogen is anticipated to be instrumental in decarbonizing sectors that are challenging to electrify and in facilitating the storage and distribution of renewable energy. While technological advancements in water electrolysis have been extensively researched, the impact of operational scenarios on the levelized cost of hydrogen (LCOH) is less explored. Here, we exhaustively assessed all operational scenarios─varying electricity supply (grid-connected vs off-grid), battery storage inclusion, utilization rates, and maintenance strategies─and calculated their LCOH via techno-economic analyses. Our findings reveal that operational scenarios can reduce LCOH more significantly than technological improvements alone. Historical trends in LCOH indicate that lower off-grid renewable electricity costs are pivotal in decreasing production expenses, whereas electrolysis efficiencies remain relatively constant. Scenarios employing off-grid renewable energy without battery storage, coupled with low-capital-expenditure electrolyzers and optimized maintenance, offer the greatest cost benefits. This framework provides a basis for green hydrogen system design, highlighting the critical role of operational optimization in accelerating cost-effective deployment.</p>","PeriodicalId":35,"journal":{"name":"Energy & Fuels","volume":"39 15","pages":"7586–7591 7586–7591"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy & Fuels","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.5c01181","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Green hydrogen is anticipated to be instrumental in decarbonizing sectors that are challenging to electrify and in facilitating the storage and distribution of renewable energy. While technological advancements in water electrolysis have been extensively researched, the impact of operational scenarios on the levelized cost of hydrogen (LCOH) is less explored. Here, we exhaustively assessed all operational scenarios─varying electricity supply (grid-connected vs off-grid), battery storage inclusion, utilization rates, and maintenance strategies─and calculated their LCOH via techno-economic analyses. Our findings reveal that operational scenarios can reduce LCOH more significantly than technological improvements alone. Historical trends in LCOH indicate that lower off-grid renewable electricity costs are pivotal in decreasing production expenses, whereas electrolysis efficiencies remain relatively constant. Scenarios employing off-grid renewable energy without battery storage, coupled with low-capital-expenditure electrolyzers and optimized maintenance, offer the greatest cost benefits. This framework provides a basis for green hydrogen system design, highlighting the critical role of operational optimization in accelerating cost-effective deployment.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
绿色氢经济:情景与技术
预计绿色氢将在电气化具有挑战性的脱碳部门以及促进可再生能源的储存和分配方面发挥重要作用。虽然水电解技术的进步已经得到了广泛的研究,但操作方案对氢的平化成本(LCOH)的影响却很少被探索。在这里,我们详尽地评估了所有运行场景──不同的电力供应(并网与离网)、电池存储、利用率和维护策略──并通过技术经济分析计算了它们的LCOH。我们的研究结果表明,操作方案比单独的技术改进更能显著降低LCOH。LCOH的历史趋势表明,较低的离网可再生电力成本是降低生产成本的关键,而电解效率保持相对稳定。采用无电池存储的离网可再生能源,加上低资本支出的电解槽和优化的维护,提供了最大的成本效益。该框架为绿色氢系统设计提供了基础,突出了运营优化在加速成本效益部署方面的关键作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Energy & Fuels
Energy & Fuels 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
13.20%
发文量
1101
审稿时长
2.1 months
期刊介绍: Energy & Fuels publishes reports of research in the technical area defined by the intersection of the disciplines of chemistry and chemical engineering and the application domain of non-nuclear energy and fuels. This includes research directed at the formation of, exploration for, and production of fossil fuels and biomass; the properties and structure or molecular composition of both raw fuels and refined products; the chemistry involved in the processing and utilization of fuels; fuel cells and their applications; and the analytical and instrumental techniques used in investigations of the foregoing areas.
期刊最新文献
Issue Editorial Masthead Issue Publication Information Issue Publication Information Issue Editorial Masthead Synergistic Conductive Network of Polypyrrole and Carbon for High-Performance NFPP Cathode
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1