Seismological geothermometer. Part II: Neural network modeling of the temperature prediction from seismic velocity data in the upper crust

IF 2.1 3区 地球科学 Q2 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Journal of Applied Geophysics Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-12 DOI:10.1016/j.jappgeo.2025.105724
Viacheslav V. Spichak, Olga K. Zakharova
{"title":"Seismological geothermometer. Part II: Neural network modeling of the temperature prediction from seismic velocity data in the upper crust","authors":"Viacheslav V. Spichak,&nbsp;Olga K. Zakharova","doi":"10.1016/j.jappgeo.2025.105724","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The temperature prediction accuracy in the upper crust from the seismic velocity data is estimated by neural network modeling. To this end, we used a 2-D temperature model built earlier along the northern Tien Shan latitudinal profile up to a depth of 27 km. We modeled the temperature prediction at depths beneath boreholes and at large distances from the locations where the initial data were available. The estimation of the temperature prediction from the <em>V</em><sub><em>P</em></sub> and <em>V</em><sub><em>S</em></sub> at depths below the boreholes indicated that the relative accuracy decreases when the ratio (N) between the target and borehole depths increases. As a whole, at any ratio N, the accuracy of the temperature prediction from <em>V</em><sub><em>S</em></sub> is higher than that from V<sub>P</sub>. In particular, the average relative errors increase when N growths from 2 to 10 in the ranges 6.8–28.4 % and 5.1–20.1 % when using V<sub>P</sub> or <em>V</em><sub><em>S</em></sub>, respectively. Assessment of the temperature prediction from V<sub>P</sub> and <em>V</em><sub><em>S</em></sub> in other locations indicated that at distances up to 16 km, the prediction errors are 7.4 % and 5.7 %, respectively. When this distance is increased 4 times, relative errors are increased 2–3 times. We conclude that the neural network temperature prediction from the seismic velocity data (especially, <em>V</em><sub><em>S</em></sub>) could be carried out with sufficient accuracy both beneath boreholes and at large distances and therefore could be used as a seismological geothermometer.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54882,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Geophysics","volume":"238 ","pages":"Article 105724"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Geophysics","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0926985125001053","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The temperature prediction accuracy in the upper crust from the seismic velocity data is estimated by neural network modeling. To this end, we used a 2-D temperature model built earlier along the northern Tien Shan latitudinal profile up to a depth of 27 km. We modeled the temperature prediction at depths beneath boreholes and at large distances from the locations where the initial data were available. The estimation of the temperature prediction from the VP and VS at depths below the boreholes indicated that the relative accuracy decreases when the ratio (N) between the target and borehole depths increases. As a whole, at any ratio N, the accuracy of the temperature prediction from VS is higher than that from VP. In particular, the average relative errors increase when N growths from 2 to 10 in the ranges 6.8–28.4 % and 5.1–20.1 % when using VP or VS, respectively. Assessment of the temperature prediction from VP and VS in other locations indicated that at distances up to 16 km, the prediction errors are 7.4 % and 5.7 %, respectively. When this distance is increased 4 times, relative errors are increased 2–3 times. We conclude that the neural network temperature prediction from the seismic velocity data (especially, VS) could be carried out with sufficient accuracy both beneath boreholes and at large distances and therefore could be used as a seismological geothermometer.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
地震地热温标。第二部分:基于地震速度数据的上地壳温度预测的神经网络建模
利用神经网络模型估计了地震速度数据对上地壳温度的预测精度。为此,我们使用了早先沿天山北部纬向剖面建立的二维温度模型,深度可达27 km。我们模拟了钻孔深处的温度预测,并在距离初始数据可用的位置很远的地方进行了预测。利用井深以下VP和VS进行温度预测的结果表明,随着目标与井深之比(N)的增大,相对精度降低。总体而言,在任意比值N下,VS的温度预测精度都高于VP。特别是当N从2增加到10时,VP和VS的平均相对误差分别在6.8 ~ 28.4%和5.1 ~ 20.1%范围内增加。对其他地点VP和VS的温度预报进行评估表明,在距离16 km以内,预测误差分别为7.4%和5.7%。当此距离增加4倍时,相对误差增加2-3倍。我们的结论是,从地震速度数据(特别是VS)中进行的神经网络温度预测可以在钻孔下和远距离上进行足够的精度,因此可以用作地震地温计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Applied Geophysics
Journal of Applied Geophysics 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
274
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Applied Geophysics with its key objective of responding to pertinent and timely needs, places particular emphasis on methodological developments and innovative applications of geophysical techniques for addressing environmental, engineering, and hydrological problems. Related topical research in exploration geophysics and in soil and rock physics is also covered by the Journal of Applied Geophysics.
期刊最新文献
Reconstruction of electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) data using different base measurements Hybrid GIS-machine learning approach for base metal prospectivity mapping in the Gawler Craton, South Australia Optimized gradient boosting models for accurate and reliable prediction of rock electrical conductivity A novel method for spatial localization of dam leakage channels based on total magnetic field gradient Simultaneous denoising and interpolation of seismic data based on spatial multi-scale cross-shaped window Transformer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1