Impact of charging in constant potential electrochemistry modelling

IF 6.5 1区 化学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL Journal of Catalysis Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-16 DOI:10.1016/j.jcat.2025.116148
Henrik H. Kristoffersen
{"title":"Impact of charging in constant potential electrochemistry modelling","authors":"Henrik H. Kristoffersen","doi":"10.1016/j.jcat.2025.116148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>A huge issue in computational electrochemistry is that different modelling approaches, used to study electron transfer reactions, give different results that cannot easily be reconciled with each other. Modeling approaches differ in their handling of interface charging and employed electrolyte model. I study charging of electrolyte-Cu(111) interfaces with electrons and cations (or positive continuum charge) and observe that charging energies (i.e. the energy stabilization from charging the interface with one extra electron and thereby going from one potential to another) depend strongly on the electrolyte model. When the electrolyte is a film containing water molecules, there is a significant stabilization of the energy with more negative potential. This is in contrast to the charging of an interface with implicit solvent, where charge repulsion result in low stabilization of the energy with more negative potential. Therefore, modelling with implicit solvent gives the impression that changing has small effect on constant potential reaction energies and, consequently, that charging can be ignored. This is likely erroneous. I further consider constant potential CO<sub>2</sub> adsorption to highlight the importance of charging and using an electrolyte model with water molecules, and show that other modelling approaches gives significantly different CO<sub>2</sub> adsorption energies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":346,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Catalysis","volume":"447 ","pages":"Article 116148"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Catalysis","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021951725002131","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A huge issue in computational electrochemistry is that different modelling approaches, used to study electron transfer reactions, give different results that cannot easily be reconciled with each other. Modeling approaches differ in their handling of interface charging and employed electrolyte model. I study charging of electrolyte-Cu(111) interfaces with electrons and cations (or positive continuum charge) and observe that charging energies (i.e. the energy stabilization from charging the interface with one extra electron and thereby going from one potential to another) depend strongly on the electrolyte model. When the electrolyte is a film containing water molecules, there is a significant stabilization of the energy with more negative potential. This is in contrast to the charging of an interface with implicit solvent, where charge repulsion result in low stabilization of the energy with more negative potential. Therefore, modelling with implicit solvent gives the impression that changing has small effect on constant potential reaction energies and, consequently, that charging can be ignored. This is likely erroneous. I further consider constant potential CO2 adsorption to highlight the importance of charging and using an electrolyte model with water molecules, and show that other modelling approaches gives significantly different CO2 adsorption energies.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
恒电位电化学建模中充电的影响
计算电化学中的一个巨大问题是,用于研究电子转移反应的不同建模方法会给出不同的结果,而且这些结果很难相互协调。不同的建模方法在处理界面充电和使用电解质模型方面有所不同。我研究了电解质- cu(111)界面与电子和阳离子(或正连续电荷)的充电,并观察到充电能量(即用一个额外的电子给界面充电从而从一个电位转移到另一个电位的能量稳定)强烈依赖于电解质模型。当电解质是含有水分子的薄膜时,能量显著稳定,负电位增加。这与隐式溶剂界面的充电相反,其中电荷排斥导致能量的低稳定性,具有更多的负电位。因此,用隐式溶剂建模给人的印象是,变化对恒定的反应势能影响很小,因此,电荷可以忽略不计。这可能是错误的。我进一步考虑了恒定电位CO2吸附,以强调充电和使用水分子电解质模型的重要性,并表明其他建模方法给出了显著不同的CO2吸附能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Catalysis
Journal of Catalysis 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
12.30
自引率
5.50%
发文量
447
审稿时长
31 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Catalysis publishes scholarly articles on both heterogeneous and homogeneous catalysis, covering a wide range of chemical transformations. These include various types of catalysis, such as those mediated by photons, plasmons, and electrons. The focus of the studies is to understand the relationship between catalytic function and the underlying chemical properties of surfaces and metal complexes. The articles in the journal offer innovative concepts and explore the synthesis and kinetics of inorganic solids and homogeneous complexes. Furthermore, they discuss spectroscopic techniques for characterizing catalysts, investigate the interaction of probes and reacting species with catalysts, and employ theoretical methods. The research presented in the journal should have direct relevance to the field of catalytic processes, addressing either fundamental aspects or applications of catalysis.
期刊最新文献
Graphitic carbon nitride supported manganese catalyst for β-Alkylation of secondary alcohols with primary alcohols via double hydrogen autotransfer A single catalyst solution: unraveling propane-to-propene conversion over WOx/SiO2 catalysts combining DFT and microkinetic modeling study Encapsulation-driven geometric and electronic tuning of Rh nanoparticles in aluminum-modified zeolite for ambient-pressure methanation Tailoring the polyolefin hydrogenolysis performance of Ru/TiO2 through TiO2 support facet engineering Highly selective linear α-olefins production from syngas over alkali free FexCy@MnOx catalyst
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1