Transforming plant-based milk alternatives for better health

IF 6.6 1区 农林科学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY LWT - Food Science and Technology Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-15 DOI:10.1016/j.lwt.2025.117787
Carole Liechti , Gabriele Mack , Barbara Walther , Jeanine Ammann
{"title":"Transforming plant-based milk alternatives for better health","authors":"Carole Liechti ,&nbsp;Gabriele Mack ,&nbsp;Barbara Walther ,&nbsp;Jeanine Ammann","doi":"10.1016/j.lwt.2025.117787","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Plant-based milk alternatives do not always meet nutritional standards, and the reported reformulation efforts are weak. Therefore, there is a need for insight into the potential of making these products healthier. The first aim of this study was to analyse the nutritional and compositional quality of these products. Here, we conducted an online market inventory of 66 plant-based milk alternatives, calculated their Nutri-Scores based on updated Rayner's score, and analysed their additives (number &amp; types) and proportions of processed/unprocessed plant sources. Our second aim was to identify the factors influencing the nutritional and compositional quality of the products. Therefore, we examined the correlations between the nutritional, compositional, and price characteristics of the products. The third aim was to explore the potential for reformulation to make products healthier. We considered realistic cut-off levels for nutritional and compositional values. We found that almost half of the 66 products analysed were of poor nutritional quality (Nutri-Score of D) and contained one to three additives. As solutions, we identified approaches that could reduce the Rayner's score (−12 points), total sugar content (−8 g/100 ml), calorie content (−36 kcal/100 ml), percentage of processed plant sources (−17 %), and number of additives (−3) of these products.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":382,"journal":{"name":"LWT - Food Science and Technology","volume":"223 ","pages":"Article 117787"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LWT - Food Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0023643825004712","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Plant-based milk alternatives do not always meet nutritional standards, and the reported reformulation efforts are weak. Therefore, there is a need for insight into the potential of making these products healthier. The first aim of this study was to analyse the nutritional and compositional quality of these products. Here, we conducted an online market inventory of 66 plant-based milk alternatives, calculated their Nutri-Scores based on updated Rayner's score, and analysed their additives (number & types) and proportions of processed/unprocessed plant sources. Our second aim was to identify the factors influencing the nutritional and compositional quality of the products. Therefore, we examined the correlations between the nutritional, compositional, and price characteristics of the products. The third aim was to explore the potential for reformulation to make products healthier. We considered realistic cut-off levels for nutritional and compositional values. We found that almost half of the 66 products analysed were of poor nutritional quality (Nutri-Score of D) and contained one to three additives. As solutions, we identified approaches that could reduce the Rayner's score (−12 points), total sugar content (−8 g/100 ml), calorie content (−36 kcal/100 ml), percentage of processed plant sources (−17 %), and number of additives (−3) of these products.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
转变植物性牛奶替代品,促进健康
植物性牛奶替代品并不总是符合营养标准,而且报道的重新配方努力也很弱。因此,有必要深入了解使这些产品更健康的潜力。本研究的第一个目的是分析这些产品的营养和成分质量。在这里,我们对66种植物性牛奶替代品进行了在线市场盘点,根据更新的雷纳评分计算了它们的营养评分,并分析了它们的添加剂(数量&;类型)和加工/未加工植物来源的比例。我们的第二个目标是确定影响产品营养和成分质量的因素。因此,我们研究了产品的营养、成分和价格特征之间的相关性。第三个目标是探索重新配方的潜力,使产品更健康。我们考虑了营养和成分值的现实临界值。我们发现,在分析的66种产品中,几乎有一半的产品营养质量差(营养评分为D),并且含有一到三种添加剂。作为解决方案,我们确定了可以降低这些产品的雷纳分数(- 12分)、总糖含量(- 8克/100毫升)、卡路里含量(- 36千卡/100毫升)、加工植物来源百分比(- 17%)和添加剂数量(- 3)的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
LWT - Food Science and Technology
LWT - Food Science and Technology 工程技术-食品科技
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
6.70%
发文量
1724
审稿时长
65 days
期刊介绍: LWT - Food Science and Technology is an international journal that publishes innovative papers in the fields of food chemistry, biochemistry, microbiology, technology and nutrition. The work described should be innovative either in the approach or in the methods used. The significance of the results either for the science community or for the food industry must also be specified. Contributions written in English are welcomed in the form of review articles, short reviews, research papers, and research notes. Papers featuring animal trials and cell cultures are outside the scope of the journal and will not be considered for publication.
期刊最新文献
Chemometric-assisted near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) for rapid biochemical profiling and diversity assessment in Job's tears (Coix lacryma-jobi) Enhancing the nutritional profile and in vitro digestion properties of dual-protein extrudates by blending surimi with soybean flour Designing an IDDSI level 2 compliant punch-type reduced-salt chicken meat floss drink via ultrasonic marination and rheological regulation Characterization of the aroma profile and dynamic changes in shrimp sauce with different storage time based on E-nose, GC-IMS and GC-MS Revealing an environmentally friendly process for degradation of walnut green husk by Klebsiella variicola M6 and β-xylosidase: Characterization and application
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1