Valerio Ricci , Stefania Chiappini , Giovanni Martinotti , Giuseppe Maina
{"title":"Cannabis use and psychotic-like experiences: A systematic review of biological vulnerability, potency effects, and clinical trajectories","authors":"Valerio Ricci , Stefania Chiappini , Giovanni Martinotti , Giuseppe Maina","doi":"10.1016/j.psychres.2025.116496","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Epidemiological data have provided evidence that psychotic-like experiences (PLEs) occur in the general population without clinical impairment. According to the psychosis continuum hypothesis, PLEs are subject to multiple risk factors. This review synthesizes current research on biological, substance use-related, and environmental risk factors for PLEs in non-clinical populations. PubMed/Medline and Scopus databases were searched for peer-reviewed studies published until January 2024 investigating risk factors for PLEs in non-clinical samples. Following PRISMA guidelines, 38 full-text articles were analyzed after title/abstract and full-text screening (PROSPERO registration ID: N 1001,807). Four main risk factor categories emerged. Biological vulnerabilities included specific metabolic profiles, genetic predisposition, and neurobiological alterations. Substance use patterns, particularly high-potency cannabis, showed significant associations with PLEs, with evidence for bidirectional relationships. Socio-demographic factors revealed influences of digital media use, ethnic density, and gender differences. Outcome studies demonstrated associations between PLEs and consequences including suicidal behavior and cognitive impairments. Findings suggest a complex interplay between multiple risk factors in PLE development. More attention should be paid to the interaction between biological vulnerabilities and environmental factors, as these experiences may represent important markers for mental health outcomes. A comprehensive assessment approach and proactive early intervention strategies are essential for the timely identification and management of at-risk individuals. Our findings support a multifactorial model where genetic vulnerabilities, cannabis use patterns, and socio-environmental factors influence PLE trajectories. The bidirectional cannabis-PLE relationship suggests self-regulatory mechanisms that could inform preventive interventions. Early identification of PLEs in young cannabis users represents a crucial opportunity for targeted clinical interventions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20819,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatry Research","volume":"348 ","pages":"Article 116496"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatry Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165178125001441","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Epidemiological data have provided evidence that psychotic-like experiences (PLEs) occur in the general population without clinical impairment. According to the psychosis continuum hypothesis, PLEs are subject to multiple risk factors. This review synthesizes current research on biological, substance use-related, and environmental risk factors for PLEs in non-clinical populations. PubMed/Medline and Scopus databases were searched for peer-reviewed studies published until January 2024 investigating risk factors for PLEs in non-clinical samples. Following PRISMA guidelines, 38 full-text articles were analyzed after title/abstract and full-text screening (PROSPERO registration ID: N 1001,807). Four main risk factor categories emerged. Biological vulnerabilities included specific metabolic profiles, genetic predisposition, and neurobiological alterations. Substance use patterns, particularly high-potency cannabis, showed significant associations with PLEs, with evidence for bidirectional relationships. Socio-demographic factors revealed influences of digital media use, ethnic density, and gender differences. Outcome studies demonstrated associations between PLEs and consequences including suicidal behavior and cognitive impairments. Findings suggest a complex interplay between multiple risk factors in PLE development. More attention should be paid to the interaction between biological vulnerabilities and environmental factors, as these experiences may represent important markers for mental health outcomes. A comprehensive assessment approach and proactive early intervention strategies are essential for the timely identification and management of at-risk individuals. Our findings support a multifactorial model where genetic vulnerabilities, cannabis use patterns, and socio-environmental factors influence PLE trajectories. The bidirectional cannabis-PLE relationship suggests self-regulatory mechanisms that could inform preventive interventions. Early identification of PLEs in young cannabis users represents a crucial opportunity for targeted clinical interventions.
流行病学数据提供的证据表明,类精神病经历(ple)发生在一般人群中,没有临床损害。根据精神病连续假说,ple受到多种危险因素的影响。本文综述了目前在非临床人群中发生ple的生物、物质使用相关和环境风险因素方面的研究。PubMed/Medline和Scopus数据库检索了截至2024年1月发表的同行评议研究,这些研究调查了非临床样本中ple的风险因素。遵循PRISMA指南,38篇全文文章在标题/摘要和全文筛选后进行分析(PROSPERO注册ID: N 1001,807)。出现了四个主要的风险因素类别。生物脆弱性包括特定的代谢特征、遗传易感性和神经生物学改变。物质使用模式,特别是强效大麻,显示出与ple的显著关联,有证据表明存在双向关系。社会人口因素揭示了数字媒体使用、种族密度和性别差异的影响。结果研究表明,ple与自杀行为和认知障碍等后果之间存在关联。研究结果表明,在PLE的发展中,多种危险因素之间存在复杂的相互作用。应更多地关注生物脆弱性与环境因素之间的相互作用,因为这些经历可能是心理健康结果的重要标志。全面的评估方法和积极的早期干预策略对于及时识别和管理高危个体至关重要。我们的研究结果支持一个多因素模型,其中遗传脆弱性,大麻使用模式和社会环境因素影响PLE轨迹。大麻与ple的双向关系表明,自我调节机制可以为预防性干预提供信息。早期识别年轻大麻使用者的ple是进行有针对性的临床干预的关键机会。
期刊介绍:
Psychiatry Research offers swift publication of comprehensive research reports and reviews within the field of psychiatry.
The scope of the journal encompasses:
Biochemical, physiological, neuroanatomic, genetic, neurocognitive, and psychosocial determinants of psychiatric disorders.
Diagnostic assessments of psychiatric disorders.
Evaluations that pursue hypotheses about the cause or causes of psychiatric diseases.
Evaluations of pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic psychiatric treatments.
Basic neuroscience studies related to animal or neurochemical models for psychiatric disorders.
Methodological advances, such as instrumentation, clinical scales, and assays directly applicable to psychiatric research.