Splenectomy Improves Outcome of Intracerebral Hemorrhage

IF 4.2 2区 生物学 Q2 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY The FASEB Journal Pub Date : 2025-04-18 DOI:10.1096/fj.202500191R
Chun Hin Leung, Hei Tung Shek, Jiaxin Liu, Karrie M. Kiang, Gilberto Ka-Kit Leung
{"title":"Splenectomy Improves Outcome of Intracerebral Hemorrhage","authors":"Chun Hin Leung,&nbsp;Hei Tung Shek,&nbsp;Jiaxin Liu,&nbsp;Karrie M. Kiang,&nbsp;Gilberto Ka-Kit Leung","doi":"10.1096/fj.202500191R","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The acute splenic response triggers a surge of immune cells and pro-inflammatory mediators, exacerbating secondary brain injury and worsening the outcome after intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). Splenectomy confers benefits in experimental ischaemic stroke, but its effects on ICH are not known. We conducted a proof-of-concept study to test the hypothesis that a prior splenectomy would improve behavioral outcomes after ICH. Adult C57BL/6N mice with collagenase-induced ICH that had undergone splenectomy two weeks prior were compared with those with intact spleens. Motor function, haematoma size, cerebral oedema, intracerebral and peripheral blood neutrophil counts were evaluated. Splenectomised mice had lower neutrophil counts in peripheral blood and peri-haematoma regions of the brain. They performed better on the modified Neurological Severity Score during the first week post-ICH and for a shorter duration on rotarod and cylinder tests. Haematomas in non-splenectomised animals showed expansion after the initial hemorrhage and were larger than in splenectomised animals, with more severe surrounding oedema and greater mass effect. This is the first report on the beneficial effects of splenectomy in experimental ICH. Further studies on the optimal timing and mode of splenic response ablation are justified to assess its translational potential.</p>","PeriodicalId":50455,"journal":{"name":"The FASEB Journal","volume":"39 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1096/fj.202500191R","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The FASEB Journal","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://faseb.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1096/fj.202500191R","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The acute splenic response triggers a surge of immune cells and pro-inflammatory mediators, exacerbating secondary brain injury and worsening the outcome after intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). Splenectomy confers benefits in experimental ischaemic stroke, but its effects on ICH are not known. We conducted a proof-of-concept study to test the hypothesis that a prior splenectomy would improve behavioral outcomes after ICH. Adult C57BL/6N mice with collagenase-induced ICH that had undergone splenectomy two weeks prior were compared with those with intact spleens. Motor function, haematoma size, cerebral oedema, intracerebral and peripheral blood neutrophil counts were evaluated. Splenectomised mice had lower neutrophil counts in peripheral blood and peri-haematoma regions of the brain. They performed better on the modified Neurological Severity Score during the first week post-ICH and for a shorter duration on rotarod and cylinder tests. Haematomas in non-splenectomised animals showed expansion after the initial hemorrhage and were larger than in splenectomised animals, with more severe surrounding oedema and greater mass effect. This is the first report on the beneficial effects of splenectomy in experimental ICH. Further studies on the optimal timing and mode of splenic response ablation are justified to assess its translational potential.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
脾切除术改善脑出血的预后
急性脾反应触发免疫细胞和促炎介质的激增,加剧继发性脑损伤,恶化脑出血(ICH)后的预后。脾切除术对实验性缺血性脑卒中有好处,但对脑出血的影响尚不清楚。我们进行了一项概念验证研究,以验证先前的脾切除术可以改善脑出血后行为结果的假设。将2周前行脾切除术的胶原酶诱导脑出血C57BL/6N成年小鼠与脾完整小鼠进行比较。评估运动功能、血肿大小、脑水肿、脑内及外周血中性粒细胞计数。脾切除小鼠外周血和脑血肿周围的中性粒细胞计数较低。在ich后的第一周,他们在改良神经严重程度评分上表现较好,在旋转棒和圆柱体测试中持续时间较短。未切除脾动物的血肿在初次出血后呈扩张,且比切除脾动物的血肿大,周围水肿更严重,肿块效应更大。这是首次报道脾切除术治疗实验性脑出血的有益效果。脾反应消融的最佳时机和模式有待进一步研究,以评估其转化潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
The FASEB Journal
The FASEB Journal 生物-生化与分子生物学
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
2.10%
发文量
6243
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The FASEB Journal publishes international, transdisciplinary research covering all fields of biology at every level of organization: atomic, molecular, cell, tissue, organ, organismic and population. While the journal strives to include research that cuts across the biological sciences, it also considers submissions that lie within one field, but may have implications for other fields as well. The journal seeks to publish basic and translational research, but also welcomes reports of pre-clinical and early clinical research. In addition to research, review, and hypothesis submissions, The FASEB Journal also seeks perspectives, commentaries, book reviews, and similar content related to the life sciences in its Up Front section.
期刊最新文献
Multi-Omics Integration Identifies Immune-ECM Dysregulation and Candidate Biomarkers of Infected High-Stage Pressure Injury in a Novel Aged-Rat Model. Single-Cell RNA Sequencing Reveals the Role of Macrophage-Granulosa Cell Crosstalk in Regulating Granulosa Cells Function in Sheep. The Secretome From Mechanically Loaded Myoblasts Enhances Tenocyte-Mediated Wound Healing in a 3D In Vitro Tendon Model. Polyethylene Microplastic Exposure Disrupts Sex and Gut Hormones via Gut Microbial and Metabolic Pathways. Vericiguat Attenuates Post-Myocardial Infarction Inflammation Associated With Macrophage Polarization and Regulation of the Survivin/Caspase-6 Pathway.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1