Regional Differences in the Frequency of BRCA1 and BRCA2 Variants in Northeastern Japan: A Cohort Study

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Cancer Medicine Pub Date : 2025-04-18 DOI:10.1002/cam4.70443
Hidekazu Shirota, Akimitsu Miyake, Maako Kawamura, Shuhei Suzuki, Kensuke Saito, Jun Yasuda, Hiroyuki Shibata, Motonobu Saito, Takeshi Iwaya, Hiroshi Tada, Muneaki Shimada, Naoki Kawamorita, Masayuki Kanamori, Eisaku Miyauchi, Hidetaka Niizuma, Tomoyuki Iwasaki, Yuki Kasahara, Hiroo Imai, Ken Saijo, Keigo Komine, Masanobu Takahashi, Tetsuya Niihori, Yoko Aoki, Toru Furukawa, Gen Tamiya, Chikashi Ishioka
{"title":"Regional Differences in the Frequency of BRCA1 and BRCA2 Variants in Northeastern Japan: A Cohort Study","authors":"Hidekazu Shirota,&nbsp;Akimitsu Miyake,&nbsp;Maako Kawamura,&nbsp;Shuhei Suzuki,&nbsp;Kensuke Saito,&nbsp;Jun Yasuda,&nbsp;Hiroyuki Shibata,&nbsp;Motonobu Saito,&nbsp;Takeshi Iwaya,&nbsp;Hiroshi Tada,&nbsp;Muneaki Shimada,&nbsp;Naoki Kawamorita,&nbsp;Masayuki Kanamori,&nbsp;Eisaku Miyauchi,&nbsp;Hidetaka Niizuma,&nbsp;Tomoyuki Iwasaki,&nbsp;Yuki Kasahara,&nbsp;Hiroo Imai,&nbsp;Ken Saijo,&nbsp;Keigo Komine,&nbsp;Masanobu Takahashi,&nbsp;Tetsuya Niihori,&nbsp;Yoko Aoki,&nbsp;Toru Furukawa,&nbsp;Gen Tamiya,&nbsp;Chikashi Ishioka","doi":"10.1002/cam4.70443","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Germline mutations in <i>BRCA1</i>/<i>2</i> are known to cause hereditary tumors in the breast, ovary, and other organs. With the widespread adoption of comprehensive diagnostics, including comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) tests for solid tumors, many patients with <i>BRCA1</i>/<i>2</i> variants have been identified.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>In this study, we extracted and analyzed cases of <i>BRCA1</i>/<i>2</i> variants that were presumed to be germline, which were repeatedly detected using the CGP test for solid tumors in northeastern Japan. The frequencies of <i>BRCA1</i>/<i>2</i> variants in regional areas were compared with those of healthy individuals or nationwide cancer cohorts to investigate regional distribution.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Our findings revealed regional disparities in <i>BRCA1</i>/<i>2</i> pathogenic germline variants, while variants of unknown significance (VUS) showed no such differences. The regional distribution of <i>BRCA1</i> and <i>BRCA2</i> variants showed distinct patterns: pathogenic variants of <i>BRCA1</i> exhibited regional differences and were less prevalent compared to VUS, whereas <i>BRCA2</i> variants, including both pathogenic variants and VUS, did not exhibit such clear regional localization. This discrepancy in regional distribution between <i>BRCA1</i> and <i>BRCA2</i> variants could be attributed to factors such as the diversity of the genome, gender differences, and cancer types.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>These results highlight the importance of considering regional differences in comparative cohort studies, particularly in assessing the differential extension of mutations in pathogenic changes and VUS. Moreover, a presumption of pathogenicity variants would need to be discussed at the regional level.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":139,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Medicine","volume":"14 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cam4.70443","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cam4.70443","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Germline mutations in BRCA1/2 are known to cause hereditary tumors in the breast, ovary, and other organs. With the widespread adoption of comprehensive diagnostics, including comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) tests for solid tumors, many patients with BRCA1/2 variants have been identified.

Methods

In this study, we extracted and analyzed cases of BRCA1/2 variants that were presumed to be germline, which were repeatedly detected using the CGP test for solid tumors in northeastern Japan. The frequencies of BRCA1/2 variants in regional areas were compared with those of healthy individuals or nationwide cancer cohorts to investigate regional distribution.

Results

Our findings revealed regional disparities in BRCA1/2 pathogenic germline variants, while variants of unknown significance (VUS) showed no such differences. The regional distribution of BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants showed distinct patterns: pathogenic variants of BRCA1 exhibited regional differences and were less prevalent compared to VUS, whereas BRCA2 variants, including both pathogenic variants and VUS, did not exhibit such clear regional localization. This discrepancy in regional distribution between BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants could be attributed to factors such as the diversity of the genome, gender differences, and cancer types.

Conclusions

These results highlight the importance of considering regional differences in comparative cohort studies, particularly in assessing the differential extension of mutations in pathogenic changes and VUS. Moreover, a presumption of pathogenicity variants would need to be discussed at the regional level.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
日本东北部BRCA1和BRCA2变异频率的区域差异:一项队列研究
BRCA1/2的种系突变已知可导致乳腺、卵巢和其他器官的遗传性肿瘤。随着全面诊断的广泛采用,包括实体瘤的全面基因组分析(CGP)测试,许多BRCA1/2变异体患者已被确定。方法在本研究中,我们提取并分析了推测为种系的BRCA1/2变异病例,这些病例使用CGP测试在日本东北部的实体瘤中反复检测到。将区域BRCA1/2变异的频率与健康个体或全国癌症队列的频率进行比较,以调查区域分布。结果BRCA1/2致病种系变异存在区域差异,而未知显著性变异(VUS)无区域差异。BRCA1和BRCA2变异的区域分布表现出明显的模式:BRCA1的致病变异表现出区域差异,与VUS相比不那么普遍,而BRCA2变异,包括致病变异和VUS,没有表现出如此明确的区域定位。BRCA1和BRCA2变体在区域分布上的差异可归因于基因组多样性、性别差异和癌症类型等因素。这些结果强调了在比较队列研究中考虑区域差异的重要性,特别是在评估致病变化和VUS突变的差异扩展时。此外,需要在区域一级讨论对致病性变异的推定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cancer Medicine
Cancer Medicine ONCOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
2.50%
发文量
907
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊介绍: Cancer Medicine is a peer-reviewed, open access, interdisciplinary journal providing rapid publication of research from global biomedical researchers across the cancer sciences. The journal will consider submissions from all oncologic specialties, including, but not limited to, the following areas: Clinical Cancer Research Translational research ∙ clinical trials ∙ chemotherapy ∙ radiation therapy ∙ surgical therapy ∙ clinical observations ∙ clinical guidelines ∙ genetic consultation ∙ ethical considerations Cancer Biology: Molecular biology ∙ cellular biology ∙ molecular genetics ∙ genomics ∙ immunology ∙ epigenetics ∙ metabolic studies ∙ proteomics ∙ cytopathology ∙ carcinogenesis ∙ drug discovery and delivery. Cancer Prevention: Behavioral science ∙ psychosocial studies ∙ screening ∙ nutrition ∙ epidemiology and prevention ∙ community outreach. Bioinformatics: Gene expressions profiles ∙ gene regulation networks ∙ genome bioinformatics ∙ pathwayanalysis ∙ prognostic biomarkers. Cancer Medicine publishes original research articles, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and research methods papers, along with invited editorials and commentaries. Original research papers must report well-conducted research with conclusions supported by the data presented in the paper.
期刊最新文献
The Mediating Effect of Socioeconomic Status and Persistent Poverty on Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Pediatric Cancer Mortality in the United States. Clinical Outcomes and Prognostic Factors of Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Spinal Metastases With Epidural Spinal Cord Compression Grades 1-2. Identification and Validation of cGAS-STING Pathway-Associated Predictive and Therapeutic Models for Esophageal Squamous Cell Cancer Patients via Artificial Intelligence and Multi-Omics. Palliative Care Admission at End-of-Life in Liver Cancer: A 10 Year Population-Based Study of 3565 Deaths in Australia. Hospitalist Care for Unplanned Oncology Admissions: A Mixed-Method Analysis of Oncology and General Hospitalist Outcomes and Processes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1