{"title":"Regional Differences in the Frequency of BRCA1 and BRCA2 Variants in Northeastern Japan: A Cohort Study","authors":"Hidekazu Shirota, Akimitsu Miyake, Maako Kawamura, Shuhei Suzuki, Kensuke Saito, Jun Yasuda, Hiroyuki Shibata, Motonobu Saito, Takeshi Iwaya, Hiroshi Tada, Muneaki Shimada, Naoki Kawamorita, Masayuki Kanamori, Eisaku Miyauchi, Hidetaka Niizuma, Tomoyuki Iwasaki, Yuki Kasahara, Hiroo Imai, Ken Saijo, Keigo Komine, Masanobu Takahashi, Tetsuya Niihori, Yoko Aoki, Toru Furukawa, Gen Tamiya, Chikashi Ishioka","doi":"10.1002/cam4.70443","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Germline mutations in <i>BRCA1</i>/<i>2</i> are known to cause hereditary tumors in the breast, ovary, and other organs. With the widespread adoption of comprehensive diagnostics, including comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) tests for solid tumors, many patients with <i>BRCA1</i>/<i>2</i> variants have been identified.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>In this study, we extracted and analyzed cases of <i>BRCA1</i>/<i>2</i> variants that were presumed to be germline, which were repeatedly detected using the CGP test for solid tumors in northeastern Japan. The frequencies of <i>BRCA1</i>/<i>2</i> variants in regional areas were compared with those of healthy individuals or nationwide cancer cohorts to investigate regional distribution.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Our findings revealed regional disparities in <i>BRCA1</i>/<i>2</i> pathogenic germline variants, while variants of unknown significance (VUS) showed no such differences. The regional distribution of <i>BRCA1</i> and <i>BRCA2</i> variants showed distinct patterns: pathogenic variants of <i>BRCA1</i> exhibited regional differences and were less prevalent compared to VUS, whereas <i>BRCA2</i> variants, including both pathogenic variants and VUS, did not exhibit such clear regional localization. This discrepancy in regional distribution between <i>BRCA1</i> and <i>BRCA2</i> variants could be attributed to factors such as the diversity of the genome, gender differences, and cancer types.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>These results highlight the importance of considering regional differences in comparative cohort studies, particularly in assessing the differential extension of mutations in pathogenic changes and VUS. Moreover, a presumption of pathogenicity variants would need to be discussed at the regional level.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":139,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Medicine","volume":"14 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cam4.70443","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cam4.70443","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Germline mutations in BRCA1/2 are known to cause hereditary tumors in the breast, ovary, and other organs. With the widespread adoption of comprehensive diagnostics, including comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) tests for solid tumors, many patients with BRCA1/2 variants have been identified.
Methods
In this study, we extracted and analyzed cases of BRCA1/2 variants that were presumed to be germline, which were repeatedly detected using the CGP test for solid tumors in northeastern Japan. The frequencies of BRCA1/2 variants in regional areas were compared with those of healthy individuals or nationwide cancer cohorts to investigate regional distribution.
Results
Our findings revealed regional disparities in BRCA1/2 pathogenic germline variants, while variants of unknown significance (VUS) showed no such differences. The regional distribution of BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants showed distinct patterns: pathogenic variants of BRCA1 exhibited regional differences and were less prevalent compared to VUS, whereas BRCA2 variants, including both pathogenic variants and VUS, did not exhibit such clear regional localization. This discrepancy in regional distribution between BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants could be attributed to factors such as the diversity of the genome, gender differences, and cancer types.
Conclusions
These results highlight the importance of considering regional differences in comparative cohort studies, particularly in assessing the differential extension of mutations in pathogenic changes and VUS. Moreover, a presumption of pathogenicity variants would need to be discussed at the regional level.
期刊介绍:
Cancer Medicine is a peer-reviewed, open access, interdisciplinary journal providing rapid publication of research from global biomedical researchers across the cancer sciences. The journal will consider submissions from all oncologic specialties, including, but not limited to, the following areas:
Clinical Cancer Research
Translational research ∙ clinical trials ∙ chemotherapy ∙ radiation therapy ∙ surgical therapy ∙ clinical observations ∙ clinical guidelines ∙ genetic consultation ∙ ethical considerations
Cancer Biology:
Molecular biology ∙ cellular biology ∙ molecular genetics ∙ genomics ∙ immunology ∙ epigenetics ∙ metabolic studies ∙ proteomics ∙ cytopathology ∙ carcinogenesis ∙ drug discovery and delivery.
Cancer Prevention:
Behavioral science ∙ psychosocial studies ∙ screening ∙ nutrition ∙ epidemiology and prevention ∙ community outreach.
Bioinformatics:
Gene expressions profiles ∙ gene regulation networks ∙ genome bioinformatics ∙ pathwayanalysis ∙ prognostic biomarkers.
Cancer Medicine publishes original research articles, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and research methods papers, along with invited editorials and commentaries. Original research papers must report well-conducted research with conclusions supported by the data presented in the paper.