Brain MRI before and at term equivalent age predicts motor and cognitive outcomes in very preterm infants

Q4 Neuroscience Neuroimage. Reports Pub Date : 2025-04-19 DOI:10.1016/j.ynirp.2025.100262
Alex M. Pagnozzi , Kerstin Pannek , Roslyn N. Boyd , Liza van Eijk , Joanne M. George , Samudragupta Bora , DanaKai Bradford , Michael Fahey , Michael Ditchfield , Atul Malhotra , Paul B. Colditz , Jurgen Fripp
{"title":"Brain MRI before and at term equivalent age predicts motor and cognitive outcomes in very preterm infants","authors":"Alex M. Pagnozzi ,&nbsp;Kerstin Pannek ,&nbsp;Roslyn N. Boyd ,&nbsp;Liza van Eijk ,&nbsp;Joanne M. George ,&nbsp;Samudragupta Bora ,&nbsp;DanaKai Bradford ,&nbsp;Michael Fahey ,&nbsp;Michael Ditchfield ,&nbsp;Atul Malhotra ,&nbsp;Paul B. Colditz ,&nbsp;Jurgen Fripp","doi":"10.1016/j.ynirp.2025.100262","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of high-risk infants in the neonatal period (from 26 weeks postmenstrual age to Term Equivalent Age (TEA)) is increasingly being used for the detection of brain injuries, and the early prognostication of adverse outcomes such as Cerebral Palsy (CP). While most imaging is performed around TEA in clinical practice for infants born preterm (&lt;37 weeks of gestation), this would often require families to return to hospital for imaging. In this work, we extract structural biomarkers from MRI acquired both before and at TEA in a cohort of very preterm infants from the PPREMO and PREBO studies (n = 100), to determine if either time-point, or both combined, are predictive of both Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development – Third Edition (Bayley-III) and the Neuro-sensory Motor Developmental Assessment (NSMDA) at 2 years. Using multivariable regression, moderately strong and statistically significant associations were found between brain structure on both early and TEA MRIs with 2-year outcomes (r = 0.39–0.55 for early MRI, r = 0.37–0.49 for Term MRI, r = 0.37–0.56 for early and TEA MRI combined). Importantly, brain biomarkers associated with early childhood outcomes from MRIs were identified, including white and grey matter volumes, deep grey matter and cerebellar volumes, and gyrification and surface area across the whole cortex. Early MRI showed the best prognostic accuracy along with combining timepoints, indicating the potential clinical benefit of Early MRI in predicting adverse outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74277,"journal":{"name":"Neuroimage. Reports","volume":"5 2","pages":"Article 100262"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroimage. Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666956025000303","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Neuroscience","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of high-risk infants in the neonatal period (from 26 weeks postmenstrual age to Term Equivalent Age (TEA)) is increasingly being used for the detection of brain injuries, and the early prognostication of adverse outcomes such as Cerebral Palsy (CP). While most imaging is performed around TEA in clinical practice for infants born preterm (<37 weeks of gestation), this would often require families to return to hospital for imaging. In this work, we extract structural biomarkers from MRI acquired both before and at TEA in a cohort of very preterm infants from the PPREMO and PREBO studies (n = 100), to determine if either time-point, or both combined, are predictive of both Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development – Third Edition (Bayley-III) and the Neuro-sensory Motor Developmental Assessment (NSMDA) at 2 years. Using multivariable regression, moderately strong and statistically significant associations were found between brain structure on both early and TEA MRIs with 2-year outcomes (r = 0.39–0.55 for early MRI, r = 0.37–0.49 for Term MRI, r = 0.37–0.56 for early and TEA MRI combined). Importantly, brain biomarkers associated with early childhood outcomes from MRIs were identified, including white and grey matter volumes, deep grey matter and cerebellar volumes, and gyrification and surface area across the whole cortex. Early MRI showed the best prognostic accuracy along with combining timepoints, indicating the potential clinical benefit of Early MRI in predicting adverse outcomes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
足月前和足月时的脑MRI预测极早产儿的运动和认知结果
新生儿期高危婴儿(经后26周至足月年龄(TEA))的脑磁共振成像(MRI)越来越多地被用于脑损伤的检测和不良后果的早期预测,如脑瘫(CP)。虽然在临床实践中,大多数影像学检查是在TEA前后对早产婴儿(妊娠37周)进行的,但这通常需要家庭返回医院进行影像学检查。在这项工作中,我们从PPREMO和PREBO研究的极早产儿队列(n = 100)中提取了在TEA前和TEA时获得的MRI结构生物标志物,以确定任何一个时间点,或两者结合,是否可以预测2岁时的Bayley婴幼儿发育量表-第三版(Bayley- iii)和神经感觉运动发育评估(NSMDA)。通过多变量回归,发现早期和TEA MRI的脑结构与2年预后之间存在中等强且有统计学意义的关联(早期MRI r = 0.39-0.55, Term MRI r = 0.37-0.49,早期和TEA MRI合并r = 0.37-0.56)。重要的是,从mri中确定了与早期儿童结果相关的大脑生物标志物,包括白质和灰质体积、深灰质和小脑体积,以及整个皮层的回转和表面积。早期MRI在联合时间点上显示出最好的预后准确性,这表明早期MRI在预测不良结局方面具有潜在的临床益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neuroimage. Reports
Neuroimage. Reports Neuroscience (General)
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
87 days
期刊最新文献
Visuomotor training induces network reorganisation of frontal eye field and cuneus connectivity: A task-based fMRI study The critical role of the basal ganglia in post-stroke fatigue: A pilot study Resting-state fMRI analysis of functional connectivity and temporal dynamics differences between cocaine users and healthy controls No evidence for modulation of frontal brain activity asymmetry by a single session of EEG feedback Neural and biomarker correlates of the Parkinson's Disease–Cognitive Rating Scale in Huntington's disease
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1