Is timing as critical for repair of dextro-transposition of the great arteries with ventricular septal defect without outflow tract obstruction?

IF 1.9 JTCVS open Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-26 DOI:10.1016/j.xjon.2024.10.015
Muhammad Faateh MBBS , Spencer Hogue BS , Amir Mehdizadeh-Shrifi MD , Kevin Kulshrestha MD, MBE , Md Monir Hossain PhD , David G. Lehenbauer MD , David L.S. Morales MD , Awais Ashfaq MD
{"title":"Is timing as critical for repair of dextro-transposition of the great arteries with ventricular septal defect without outflow tract obstruction?","authors":"Muhammad Faateh MBBS ,&nbsp;Spencer Hogue BS ,&nbsp;Amir Mehdizadeh-Shrifi MD ,&nbsp;Kevin Kulshrestha MD, MBE ,&nbsp;Md Monir Hossain PhD ,&nbsp;David G. Lehenbauer MD ,&nbsp;David L.S. Morales MD ,&nbsp;Awais Ashfaq MD","doi":"10.1016/j.xjon.2024.10.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>We sought to explore the role of timing on outcomes of the arterial switch operation + ventricular septal defect closure.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Neonates undergoing the arterial switch operation + ventricular septal defect closure from the Pediatric Health Information System database (2004-2022) were identified. Patients with outflow tract obstruction were excluded. Baseline features and outcomes were compared by dividing the cohort by age at the arterial switch operation + ventricular septal defect closure: very early (0-7 days), early (8-14 days), late (15-21 days), and very late (&gt;21 days). A cut-point analysis was performed to identify if an age-cutoff predicted the composite outcome (in-hospital mortality/nonhome discharge/postoperative extracorporeal membrane oxygenation/delayed sternum closure/reoperation due to bleeding).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 1005 patients were identified. The median age at repair was 6 days (interquartile range, 4-9). Repair was performed in the majority of study centers within the patient's first week of life. The distribution was very early in 652 patients (64.9%), early in 247 patients (24.6%), late in 72 patients (7.2%), and very late in 34 patients (3.4%). Late and very late groups had a greater proportion of preterm (6.3% vs 13.8% vs 23.2% vs 26.5%) and low-birthweight (5.8% vs 9% vs 21.9% vs 20%) patients (both <em>P</em> &lt; .05). In-hospital mortality was 3.1% and similar among groups (<em>P</em> &gt; .05). The identified cutoff was 8 days. In-hospital mortality was similar when comparing 0 to 8 days with more than 8 days groups (20 [2.8%] vs 11 [3.9%], <em>P</em> = .38). The more than 8 days group was more likely to develop the composite outcome (69 [24%] vs 125 [17.4%], <em>P</em> = .02), which remained significant in the multivariable analysis (adjusted odds ratio, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.02-2.15; <em>P</em> = .04). Hospitalization costs were significantly higher in the more than 8 days group ($240,742 vs $183,728, <em>P</em> &lt; .001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This analysis of more than 1000 neonates born with dextro-transposition of the great arteries + ventricular septal defect without outflow tract obstruction revealed that most patients undergo the arterial switch operation + ventricular septal defect closure within the first week of life and had acceptable major outcomes regardless of timing. Earlier arterial switch operation + ventricular septal defect closure may confer an advantage with regard to secondary outcomes and hospitalization costs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74032,"journal":{"name":"JTCVS open","volume":"24 ","pages":"Pages 350-358"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JTCVS open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666273624003590","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

We sought to explore the role of timing on outcomes of the arterial switch operation + ventricular septal defect closure.

Methods

Neonates undergoing the arterial switch operation + ventricular septal defect closure from the Pediatric Health Information System database (2004-2022) were identified. Patients with outflow tract obstruction were excluded. Baseline features and outcomes were compared by dividing the cohort by age at the arterial switch operation + ventricular septal defect closure: very early (0-7 days), early (8-14 days), late (15-21 days), and very late (>21 days). A cut-point analysis was performed to identify if an age-cutoff predicted the composite outcome (in-hospital mortality/nonhome discharge/postoperative extracorporeal membrane oxygenation/delayed sternum closure/reoperation due to bleeding).

Results

A total of 1005 patients were identified. The median age at repair was 6 days (interquartile range, 4-9). Repair was performed in the majority of study centers within the patient's first week of life. The distribution was very early in 652 patients (64.9%), early in 247 patients (24.6%), late in 72 patients (7.2%), and very late in 34 patients (3.4%). Late and very late groups had a greater proportion of preterm (6.3% vs 13.8% vs 23.2% vs 26.5%) and low-birthweight (5.8% vs 9% vs 21.9% vs 20%) patients (both P < .05). In-hospital mortality was 3.1% and similar among groups (P > .05). The identified cutoff was 8 days. In-hospital mortality was similar when comparing 0 to 8 days with more than 8 days groups (20 [2.8%] vs 11 [3.9%], P = .38). The more than 8 days group was more likely to develop the composite outcome (69 [24%] vs 125 [17.4%], P = .02), which remained significant in the multivariable analysis (adjusted odds ratio, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.02-2.15; P = .04). Hospitalization costs were significantly higher in the more than 8 days group ($240,742 vs $183,728, P < .001).

Conclusions

This analysis of more than 1000 neonates born with dextro-transposition of the great arteries + ventricular septal defect without outflow tract obstruction revealed that most patients undergo the arterial switch operation + ventricular septal defect closure within the first week of life and had acceptable major outcomes regardless of timing. Earlier arterial switch operation + ventricular septal defect closure may confer an advantage with regard to secondary outcomes and hospitalization costs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
修复伴有室间隔缺损、无流出道梗阻的大动脉外翻时,时机是否同样重要?
目的探讨时机对动脉转换术+室间隔缺损闭合术疗效的影响。方法从儿童健康信息系统数据库(2004-2022)中选取动脉转换手术+室间隔缺损闭合的患儿。排除流出道梗阻患者。通过动脉开关手术+室间隔缺损闭合年龄分组,比较基线特征和结果:非常早(0-7天)、早期(8-14天)、晚期(15-21天)和非常晚(>;21天)。进行切点分析以确定年龄切点是否预测复合结果(住院死亡率/非家庭出院/术后体外膜氧合/延迟胸骨闭合/因出血而再次手术)。结果共检出1005例患者。修复时的中位年龄为6天(四分位数间距为4-9)。大多数研究中心在患者出生后的第一周内进行修复。早期652例(64.9%),早期247例(24.6%),晚期72例(7.2%),极晚期34例(3.4%)。晚期和非常晚期组早产儿(6.3% vs 13.8% vs 23.2% vs 26.5%)和低出生体重(5.8% vs 9% vs 21.9% vs 20%)患者的比例更高(P和lt;. 05)。住院死亡率为3.1%,各组间相似(P >;. 05)。确定的截止时间为8天。0 ~ 8天组和8天以上组住院死亡率相似(20例[2.8%]vs 11例[3.9%],P = 0.38)。超过8天的组更有可能出现复合结局(69例[24%]vs 125例[17.4%],P = 0.02),这在多变量分析中仍然具有显著性(校正优势比,1.49;95% ci, 1.02-2.15;p = .04)。住院费用在超过8天的组中明显更高(240,742美元vs 183,728美元)。措施)。结论对1000多例无流出道梗阻的大动脉右旋转位合并室间隔缺损新生儿的分析表明,大多数患者在出生后第一周内行动脉转位术+室间隔缺损关闭术,无论时间如何,其主要结局均可接受。早期动脉转换手术+室间隔缺损闭合可能在次要结局和住院费用方面具有优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Association of hospital volume with perioperative and long-term outcomes of minimally invasive thymectomy Impact of pathologically confirmed inner lung tumors on nodal upstaging and feasibility of segmentectomy versus lobectomy Reduced thrombotic risk with recombinant factor VIIa in neonatal cardiac surgery When wedge resection is good enough: Survival outcomes and nodal involvement of ground-glass–dominant stage IA non–small cell lung cancer National race-based disparities in referral to Commission on Cancer centers for lung cancer resection
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1