Better Performance of Organic Fertilizer on Improving Yield and Reducing Nitrogen Losses in a Paddy Field as Compared to Biochar-Based Fertilizer

IF 3 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Water, Air, & Soil Pollution Pub Date : 2025-04-22 DOI:10.1007/s11270-025-07987-z
Ke Wang, Shanshan Ying
{"title":"Better Performance of Organic Fertilizer on Improving Yield and Reducing Nitrogen Losses in a Paddy Field as Compared to Biochar-Based Fertilizer","authors":"Ke Wang,&nbsp;Shanshan Ying","doi":"10.1007/s11270-025-07987-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The selection of an appropriate fertilizer type is crucial for enhancing nitrogen utilization in crops and mitigating agricultural non-point source pollution. Research has demonstrated that organic fertilizers can significantly improve crop yields and enhance soil fertility by supplying a balanced array of nutrients, thereby addressing the pressing need to recycle agricultural waste. Recently, biochar-based fertilizers have garnered considerable attention due to their potential to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by sequestering carbon in biochar. Both organic and biochar-based fertilizers are recognized as environmentally sustainable options worthy of broader adoption. However, the question remains as to which of these fertilizers is more strongly recommended for agricultural practitioners. A six-month monitoring study was carried out in a long-term field trial to investigate the effects of different treatments, including chemical fertilizer, biochar-based fertilizer, organic fertilizer as a substitute for 50% of chemical fertilizer and a control group, on rice yield, nitrogen use efficiency, soil physicochemical properties, nitrogen losses, duckweed biomass, soil microbial functional genes and community. The results indicated that organic fertilizer significantly increased rice yield and nitrogen use efficiency, while reducing ammonia volatilization and nitrogen runoff losses, attributed to the higher plant uptake by rice and duckweed during the growing season. Additionally, higher <i>α</i>-diversity of bacterial communities was observed under organic fertilizer treatment. Biochar-based fertilizer promoted the transformation of the soil N cycle into the pathway for efficient plant N use but had limited improvement in rice production and pollution mitigation owing to the high pH of biochar, leading to more ammonia volatilization losses. Therefore, organic fertilizer as a substitute for chemical fertilizer is optimal fertilization for rice cultivation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":808,"journal":{"name":"Water, Air, & Soil Pollution","volume":"236 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water, Air, & Soil Pollution","FirstCategoryId":"6","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11270-025-07987-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The selection of an appropriate fertilizer type is crucial for enhancing nitrogen utilization in crops and mitigating agricultural non-point source pollution. Research has demonstrated that organic fertilizers can significantly improve crop yields and enhance soil fertility by supplying a balanced array of nutrients, thereby addressing the pressing need to recycle agricultural waste. Recently, biochar-based fertilizers have garnered considerable attention due to their potential to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by sequestering carbon in biochar. Both organic and biochar-based fertilizers are recognized as environmentally sustainable options worthy of broader adoption. However, the question remains as to which of these fertilizers is more strongly recommended for agricultural practitioners. A six-month monitoring study was carried out in a long-term field trial to investigate the effects of different treatments, including chemical fertilizer, biochar-based fertilizer, organic fertilizer as a substitute for 50% of chemical fertilizer and a control group, on rice yield, nitrogen use efficiency, soil physicochemical properties, nitrogen losses, duckweed biomass, soil microbial functional genes and community. The results indicated that organic fertilizer significantly increased rice yield and nitrogen use efficiency, while reducing ammonia volatilization and nitrogen runoff losses, attributed to the higher plant uptake by rice and duckweed during the growing season. Additionally, higher α-diversity of bacterial communities was observed under organic fertilizer treatment. Biochar-based fertilizer promoted the transformation of the soil N cycle into the pathway for efficient plant N use but had limited improvement in rice production and pollution mitigation owing to the high pH of biochar, leading to more ammonia volatilization losses. Therefore, organic fertilizer as a substitute for chemical fertilizer is optimal fertilization for rice cultivation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
与生物炭基肥料相比,有机肥在提高稻田产量和减少氮肥损失方面表现更好
选择合适的肥料类型是提高作物氮素利用率和减轻农业面源污染的关键。研究表明,有机肥可以显著提高作物产量,并通过提供均衡的营养物质来提高土壤肥力,从而解决农业废弃物回收的迫切需要。最近,生物炭基肥料因其通过在生物炭中固碳来减少温室气体排放的潜力而引起了相当大的关注。有机肥料和生物炭肥料都被认为是值得广泛采用的环境可持续选择。然而,问题仍然是,这些肥料中哪一种更强烈地被推荐给农业从业者。通过为期6个月的长期田间试验,研究了化肥、生物炭基肥、有机肥替代50%化肥和对照组不同处理对水稻产量、氮素利用效率、土壤理化性质、氮素流失、浮萍生物量、土壤微生物功能基因和群落的影响。结果表明,施用有机肥显著提高了水稻产量和氮素利用效率,减少了氨挥发和氮径流损失,这主要是由于水稻和浮萍在生长季节吸收了更多的氮素。此外,有机肥处理的细菌群落α-多样性较高。生物炭基肥料促进了土壤氮循环向植物氮有效利用途径的转变,但由于生物炭的pH值高,对水稻生产和污染缓解的改善有限,导致更多的氨挥发损失。因此,有机肥替代化肥是水稻栽培的最佳施肥方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Water, Air, & Soil Pollution
Water, Air, & Soil Pollution 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
6.90%
发文量
448
审稿时长
2.6 months
期刊介绍: Water, Air, & Soil Pollution is an international, interdisciplinary journal on all aspects of pollution and solutions to pollution in the biosphere. This includes chemical, physical and biological processes affecting flora, fauna, water, air and soil in relation to environmental pollution. Because of its scope, the subject areas are diverse and include all aspects of pollution sources, transport, deposition, accumulation, acid precipitation, atmospheric pollution, metals, aquatic pollution including marine pollution and ground water, waste water, pesticides, soil pollution, sewage, sediment pollution, forestry pollution, effects of pollutants on humans, vegetation, fish, aquatic species, micro-organisms, and animals, environmental and molecular toxicology applied to pollution research, biosensors, global and climate change, ecological implications of pollution and pollution models. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution also publishes manuscripts on novel methods used in the study of environmental pollutants, environmental toxicology, environmental biology, novel environmental engineering related to pollution, biodiversity as influenced by pollution, novel environmental biotechnology as applied to pollution (e.g. bioremediation), environmental modelling and biorestoration of polluted environments. Articles should not be submitted that are of local interest only and do not advance international knowledge in environmental pollution and solutions to pollution. Articles that simply replicate known knowledge or techniques while researching a local pollution problem will normally be rejected without review. Submitted articles must have up-to-date references, employ the correct experimental replication and statistical analysis, where needed and contain a significant contribution to new knowledge. The publishing and editorial team sincerely appreciate your cooperation. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution publishes research papers; review articles; mini-reviews; and book reviews.
期刊最新文献
Quantifying Leachable Phosphorus from the Leaves of Common Midwest Urban Street Trees and Implications for Stormwater Management Synergistic Preparation of Ceramic Granules from Oil-containing Waste White Clay and FCC Waste Catalyst and Their Adsorption of Sulfur-containing Waste Lye Solution Effectiveness of Resource Utilization of Water Treatment Residue in Green Infrastructure: Global Meta-analysis and Synthesis A Review on the Fate of Emerging Contaminants in Landfill Leachate: Insights from Conventional Treatment Approaches Composites of Alkaline Minerals and Biochar—a Savior for Acidic Soils
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1