{"title":"Better Performance of Organic Fertilizer on Improving Yield and Reducing Nitrogen Losses in a Paddy Field as Compared to Biochar-Based Fertilizer","authors":"Ke Wang, Shanshan Ying","doi":"10.1007/s11270-025-07987-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The selection of an appropriate fertilizer type is crucial for enhancing nitrogen utilization in crops and mitigating agricultural non-point source pollution. Research has demonstrated that organic fertilizers can significantly improve crop yields and enhance soil fertility by supplying a balanced array of nutrients, thereby addressing the pressing need to recycle agricultural waste. Recently, biochar-based fertilizers have garnered considerable attention due to their potential to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by sequestering carbon in biochar. Both organic and biochar-based fertilizers are recognized as environmentally sustainable options worthy of broader adoption. However, the question remains as to which of these fertilizers is more strongly recommended for agricultural practitioners. A six-month monitoring study was carried out in a long-term field trial to investigate the effects of different treatments, including chemical fertilizer, biochar-based fertilizer, organic fertilizer as a substitute for 50% of chemical fertilizer and a control group, on rice yield, nitrogen use efficiency, soil physicochemical properties, nitrogen losses, duckweed biomass, soil microbial functional genes and community. The results indicated that organic fertilizer significantly increased rice yield and nitrogen use efficiency, while reducing ammonia volatilization and nitrogen runoff losses, attributed to the higher plant uptake by rice and duckweed during the growing season. Additionally, higher <i>α</i>-diversity of bacterial communities was observed under organic fertilizer treatment. Biochar-based fertilizer promoted the transformation of the soil N cycle into the pathway for efficient plant N use but had limited improvement in rice production and pollution mitigation owing to the high pH of biochar, leading to more ammonia volatilization losses. Therefore, organic fertilizer as a substitute for chemical fertilizer is optimal fertilization for rice cultivation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":808,"journal":{"name":"Water, Air, & Soil Pollution","volume":"236 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water, Air, & Soil Pollution","FirstCategoryId":"6","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11270-025-07987-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The selection of an appropriate fertilizer type is crucial for enhancing nitrogen utilization in crops and mitigating agricultural non-point source pollution. Research has demonstrated that organic fertilizers can significantly improve crop yields and enhance soil fertility by supplying a balanced array of nutrients, thereby addressing the pressing need to recycle agricultural waste. Recently, biochar-based fertilizers have garnered considerable attention due to their potential to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by sequestering carbon in biochar. Both organic and biochar-based fertilizers are recognized as environmentally sustainable options worthy of broader adoption. However, the question remains as to which of these fertilizers is more strongly recommended for agricultural practitioners. A six-month monitoring study was carried out in a long-term field trial to investigate the effects of different treatments, including chemical fertilizer, biochar-based fertilizer, organic fertilizer as a substitute for 50% of chemical fertilizer and a control group, on rice yield, nitrogen use efficiency, soil physicochemical properties, nitrogen losses, duckweed biomass, soil microbial functional genes and community. The results indicated that organic fertilizer significantly increased rice yield and nitrogen use efficiency, while reducing ammonia volatilization and nitrogen runoff losses, attributed to the higher plant uptake by rice and duckweed during the growing season. Additionally, higher α-diversity of bacterial communities was observed under organic fertilizer treatment. Biochar-based fertilizer promoted the transformation of the soil N cycle into the pathway for efficient plant N use but had limited improvement in rice production and pollution mitigation owing to the high pH of biochar, leading to more ammonia volatilization losses. Therefore, organic fertilizer as a substitute for chemical fertilizer is optimal fertilization for rice cultivation.
期刊介绍:
Water, Air, & Soil Pollution is an international, interdisciplinary journal on all aspects of pollution and solutions to pollution in the biosphere. This includes chemical, physical and biological processes affecting flora, fauna, water, air and soil in relation to environmental pollution. Because of its scope, the subject areas are diverse and include all aspects of pollution sources, transport, deposition, accumulation, acid precipitation, atmospheric pollution, metals, aquatic pollution including marine pollution and ground water, waste water, pesticides, soil pollution, sewage, sediment pollution, forestry pollution, effects of pollutants on humans, vegetation, fish, aquatic species, micro-organisms, and animals, environmental and molecular toxicology applied to pollution research, biosensors, global and climate change, ecological implications of pollution and pollution models. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution also publishes manuscripts on novel methods used in the study of environmental pollutants, environmental toxicology, environmental biology, novel environmental engineering related to pollution, biodiversity as influenced by pollution, novel environmental biotechnology as applied to pollution (e.g. bioremediation), environmental modelling and biorestoration of polluted environments.
Articles should not be submitted that are of local interest only and do not advance international knowledge in environmental pollution and solutions to pollution. Articles that simply replicate known knowledge or techniques while researching a local pollution problem will normally be rejected without review. Submitted articles must have up-to-date references, employ the correct experimental replication and statistical analysis, where needed and contain a significant contribution to new knowledge. The publishing and editorial team sincerely appreciate your cooperation.
Water, Air, & Soil Pollution publishes research papers; review articles; mini-reviews; and book reviews.