Emma R. Toner;Mark Rucker;Zhiyuan Wang;Maria A. Larrazabal;Lihua Cai;Debajyoti Datta;Haroon Lone;Mehdi Boukhechba;Bethany A. Teachman;Laura E. Barnes
{"title":"Wearable Sensor-Based Multimodal Physiological Responses of Socially Anxious Individuals in Social Contexts on Zoom","authors":"Emma R. Toner;Mark Rucker;Zhiyuan Wang;Maria A. Larrazabal;Lihua Cai;Debajyoti Datta;Haroon Lone;Mehdi Boukhechba;Bethany A. Teachman;Laura E. Barnes","doi":"10.1109/TAFFC.2025.3562787","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Correctly identifying an individual’s social context from passively worn sensors holds promise for delivering just-in-time adaptive interventions (JITAIs) to treat social anxiety. In this study, we present results using passively collected data from a within-subjects experiment that assessed physiological responses across different social contexts (i.e., alone versus with others), social phases (i.e., pre- and post-interaction versus during an interaction), social interaction sizes (i.e., dyadic versus group interactions), and levels of social threat (i.e., implicit versus explicit social evaluation). Participants in the study (<inline-formula><tex-math>$N=46$</tex-math></inline-formula>) reported moderate to severe social anxiety symptoms as assessed by the Social Interaction Anxiety Scale (<inline-formula><tex-math>$\\geq$</tex-math></inline-formula>34 out of 80). Univariate paired difference tests, multivariate random forest models, and cluster analyses were used to explore physiological response patterns across different social and non-social contexts. Our results suggest that social context is more reliably distinguishable than social phase, group size, or level of social threat, and that there is considerable variability in physiological response patterns even among distinguishable contexts. Implications for real-world context detection and future deployment of JITAIs are discussed.","PeriodicalId":13131,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing","volume":"16 3","pages":"2428-2439"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10971224/","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Correctly identifying an individual’s social context from passively worn sensors holds promise for delivering just-in-time adaptive interventions (JITAIs) to treat social anxiety. In this study, we present results using passively collected data from a within-subjects experiment that assessed physiological responses across different social contexts (i.e., alone versus with others), social phases (i.e., pre- and post-interaction versus during an interaction), social interaction sizes (i.e., dyadic versus group interactions), and levels of social threat (i.e., implicit versus explicit social evaluation). Participants in the study ($N=46$) reported moderate to severe social anxiety symptoms as assessed by the Social Interaction Anxiety Scale ($\geq$34 out of 80). Univariate paired difference tests, multivariate random forest models, and cluster analyses were used to explore physiological response patterns across different social and non-social contexts. Our results suggest that social context is more reliably distinguishable than social phase, group size, or level of social threat, and that there is considerable variability in physiological response patterns even among distinguishable contexts. Implications for real-world context detection and future deployment of JITAIs are discussed.
期刊介绍:
The IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing is an international and interdisciplinary journal. Its primary goal is to share research findings on the development of systems capable of recognizing, interpreting, and simulating human emotions and related affective phenomena. The journal publishes original research on the underlying principles and theories that explain how and why affective factors shape human-technology interactions. It also focuses on how techniques for sensing and simulating affect can enhance our understanding of human emotions and processes. Additionally, the journal explores the design, implementation, and evaluation of systems that prioritize the consideration of affect in their usability. We also welcome surveys of existing work that provide new perspectives on the historical and future directions of this field.