Towards understanding the geometric error coupling effect on squareness error identification in circular tests

IF 4.5 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL Mechanism and Machine Theory Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-23 DOI:10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2025.106045
Sihan Yao , Lingtao Weng , Weiguo Gao , Wenjie Tian , Zhoujie Zhao , Dawei Zhang , Tian Huang
{"title":"Towards understanding the geometric error coupling effect on squareness error identification in circular tests","authors":"Sihan Yao ,&nbsp;Lingtao Weng ,&nbsp;Weiguo Gao ,&nbsp;Wenjie Tian ,&nbsp;Zhoujie Zhao ,&nbsp;Dawei Zhang ,&nbsp;Tian Huang","doi":"10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2025.106045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>For circular tests, the measurement data are simultaneously affected by the coupling effect of position-dependent geometric errors (PDGEs) and squareness errors. Consequently, identification method that solely considers squareness errors struggle to accurately determine the true squareness error values. To address this issue and obtain the actual squareness error, the identification method considering the geometric error coupling effect is proposed. The PDGE values and the distance data of the geometric error coupling effect are obtained based on the multi-instrument measurement data fusion, enabling the establishment of a squareness error identification model that incorporates PDGEs. The validity of the identification results is corroborated through volumetric error prediction, yielding a maximum deviation of 18.9 µm between the predicted and measured volumetric errors. The prediction accuracies of the proposed method and Ballbar 20 software, characterized by the root-mean-square error between the predicted and measured volumetric errors, are 6.7 and 20.4 µm, respectively. This indicates that the proposed method prediction results are closer to the measured values. The proposed method mathematically elucidates the coupling effect of PDGEs and squareness errors for circular tests.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49845,"journal":{"name":"Mechanism and Machine Theory","volume":"211 ","pages":"Article 106045"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mechanism and Machine Theory","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0094114X2500134X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

For circular tests, the measurement data are simultaneously affected by the coupling effect of position-dependent geometric errors (PDGEs) and squareness errors. Consequently, identification method that solely considers squareness errors struggle to accurately determine the true squareness error values. To address this issue and obtain the actual squareness error, the identification method considering the geometric error coupling effect is proposed. The PDGE values and the distance data of the geometric error coupling effect are obtained based on the multi-instrument measurement data fusion, enabling the establishment of a squareness error identification model that incorporates PDGEs. The validity of the identification results is corroborated through volumetric error prediction, yielding a maximum deviation of 18.9 µm between the predicted and measured volumetric errors. The prediction accuracies of the proposed method and Ballbar 20 software, characterized by the root-mean-square error between the predicted and measured volumetric errors, are 6.7 and 20.4 µm, respectively. This indicates that the proposed method prediction results are closer to the measured values. The proposed method mathematically elucidates the coupling effect of PDGEs and squareness errors for circular tests.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探讨几何误差耦合对圆形试验中方形误差辨识的影响
对于圆形测试,测量数据同时受到位置相关几何误差(PDGEs)和方度误差的耦合效应的影响。因此,仅考虑平方度误差的识别方法难以准确确定真实的平方度误差值。针对这一问题,提出了考虑几何误差耦合效应的识别方法。在多仪器测量数据融合的基础上,获得了几何误差耦合效应的PDGE值和距离数据,建立了包含PDGE的方形误差识别模型。通过体积误差预测验证了鉴定结果的有效性,预测的体积误差与测量的体积误差之间的最大偏差为18.9µm。所提出的方法和Ballbar 20软件的预测精度分别为6.7和20.4µm,其特征是预测和测量的体积误差之间的均方根误差。这表明该方法的预测结果更接近实测值。本文提出的方法从数学上阐明了圆试验中PDGEs与方度误差的耦合效应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Mechanism and Machine Theory
Mechanism and Machine Theory 工程技术-工程:机械
CiteScore
9.90
自引率
23.10%
发文量
450
审稿时长
20 days
期刊介绍: Mechanism and Machine Theory provides a medium of communication between engineers and scientists engaged in research and development within the fields of knowledge embraced by IFToMM, the International Federation for the Promotion of Mechanism and Machine Science, therefore affiliated with IFToMM as its official research journal. The main topics are: Design Theory and Methodology; Haptics and Human-Machine-Interfaces; Robotics, Mechatronics and Micro-Machines; Mechanisms, Mechanical Transmissions and Machines; Kinematics, Dynamics, and Control of Mechanical Systems; Applications to Bioengineering and Molecular Chemistry
期刊最新文献
Deep learning prediction of EHL friction using full surface roughness profiles: An LSTM-MLP approach Design and manufacturing method for the production of soft tensegrity structures and mechanisms An accuracy evaluation method for parallel mechanisms focusing on error amplification factor (EAF) in error transmission process A study on design optimisation of a spatial, cable-actuated variable stiffness joint The race party project: A student-centered approach for teaching dynamics of mechanical systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1