Pilot study for a preconception educational intervention for people with mobility disabilities

IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-17 DOI:10.1016/j.srhc.2025.101101
Melina A. McCabe , Amelia Gabor , Jennifer Stephens , Michael M. McKee , Hilary K. Brown , Kara B. Ayers , Anne Valentine , Willi Horner-Johnson , Monika Mitra , John A. Harris
{"title":"Pilot study for a preconception educational intervention for people with mobility disabilities","authors":"Melina A. McCabe ,&nbsp;Amelia Gabor ,&nbsp;Jennifer Stephens ,&nbsp;Michael M. McKee ,&nbsp;Hilary K. Brown ,&nbsp;Kara B. Ayers ,&nbsp;Anne Valentine ,&nbsp;Willi Horner-Johnson ,&nbsp;Monika Mitra ,&nbsp;John A. Harris","doi":"10.1016/j.srhc.2025.101101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To assess the feasibility and acceptability of our newly designed, tailored preconception educational intervention for people with mobility disabilities.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A prospective pre-post pilot study to measure the feasibility and acceptability of an educational intervention for people with mobility disabilities who could become pregnant in the next five years. Before and after general health and preconception knowledge were compared using paired t-tests.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>26 participants completed the study from November 2023 − July 2024. The most common diagnoses related to mobility disability were spinal cord injury (n = 9), spina bifida (n = 4), and cerebral palsy (n = 4). The intervention increased general health knowledge by 0.9 points (p = 0.13) and preconception health knowledge by 2.7 points (p = 0.025). A significant increase (1.8 points (95 % CI 0.9–2.6 points), p &lt; 0.001) in preconception health knowledge compared to general health knowledge suggests the intervention successfully improved the targeted knowledge area.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This pilot study demonstrated the feasibility and acceptability of a preconception educational intervention tailored to individuals with mobility disabilities. This intervention holds the potential to improve health literacy, increase preconception health knowledge, and ultimately improve pregnancy outcomes among people with mobility disabilities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54199,"journal":{"name":"Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare","volume":"44 ","pages":"Article 101101"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877575625000394","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

To assess the feasibility and acceptability of our newly designed, tailored preconception educational intervention for people with mobility disabilities.

Methods

A prospective pre-post pilot study to measure the feasibility and acceptability of an educational intervention for people with mobility disabilities who could become pregnant in the next five years. Before and after general health and preconception knowledge were compared using paired t-tests.

Results

26 participants completed the study from November 2023 − July 2024. The most common diagnoses related to mobility disability were spinal cord injury (n = 9), spina bifida (n = 4), and cerebral palsy (n = 4). The intervention increased general health knowledge by 0.9 points (p = 0.13) and preconception health knowledge by 2.7 points (p = 0.025). A significant increase (1.8 points (95 % CI 0.9–2.6 points), p < 0.001) in preconception health knowledge compared to general health knowledge suggests the intervention successfully improved the targeted knowledge area.

Conclusions

This pilot study demonstrated the feasibility and acceptability of a preconception educational intervention tailored to individuals with mobility disabilities. This intervention holds the potential to improve health literacy, increase preconception health knowledge, and ultimately improve pregnancy outcomes among people with mobility disabilities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
行动障碍人士孕前教育干预的初步研究
目的评估我们为行动障碍人士量身定制的孕前教育干预的可行性和可接受性。方法采用前瞻性的孕前试验研究,对未来5年内可能怀孕的行动障碍患者实施教育干预的可行性和可接受性进行评估。使用配对t检验比较前后的一般健康和孕前知识。26名参与者在2023年11月至2024年7月期间完成了研究。与行动障碍相关的最常见诊断为脊髓损伤(n = 9)、脊柱裂(n = 4)和脑瘫(n = 4)。干预使一般健康知识提高了0.9分(p = 0.13),使孕前健康知识提高了2.7分(p = 0.025)。显著增加(1.8个点(95% CI 0.9-2.6个点),p <;与一般健康知识相比,孕前健康知识的差异为0.001),表明干预成功改善了目标知识领域。结论本初步研究证明了针对行动障碍个体的孕前教育干预的可行性和可接受性。这一干预措施有可能提高健康素养,增加孕前健康知识,并最终改善行动不便人群的妊娠结局。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare
Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
5.60%
发文量
73
审稿时长
45 days
期刊最新文献
Factors associated with dropout from health facility childbirth after antenatal care booking in Ethiopia: A systematic review and meta-analysis Midwives’ beliefs, current practice, and knowledge of recommendations on physical activity during pregnancy and the postpartum period: An exploratory cross-sectional study Acceptability and feasibility of a midwifery intervention to promote active labour and decision-making: a qualitative study with women and nurse-midwives Pushed to the limit, driven by love: A qualitative study of women’s experiences of pregnancy with type 2 diabetes mellitus Remodeling maternal health care: evaluating the impact of implementing the midwifery model of care on maternal and neonatal health outcomes in Ethiopia: The MiMoC project
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1