Levels of nurse disaster preparedness: A systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 4.5 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Nurse Education in Practice Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-19 DOI:10.1016/j.nepr.2025.104372
Yuling Luo, Hong Yan, Yuanyuan Tang, Shijin Wang, Zhehui Yang, Tingting Zhang, Yan Liu
{"title":"Levels of nurse disaster preparedness: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Yuling Luo,&nbsp;Hong Yan,&nbsp;Yuanyuan Tang,&nbsp;Shijin Wang,&nbsp;Zhehui Yang,&nbsp;Tingting Zhang,&nbsp;Yan Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.nepr.2025.104372","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aim</h3><div>To evaluate nurses' disaster preparedness and the impact of publication year, departments, disaster response experience and disaster training on nurses' level of disaster preparedness.</div></div><div><h3>Background</h3><div>With the frequent occurrence of global disaster events. As key medical relief members, nurses' preparedness has a significant impact on disaster response effectiveness.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Systematic review and meta-analysis</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>CNKI, Wanfang, VIP, SinoMed, PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library. The search period was from the creation of the database to December 4, 2024. A random effects model was used to summarize the total mean scores for the three sub-dimensions of the Disaster Preparedness Evaluation Tool. Subgroup analyses were performed to explore sources of between-study heterogeneity.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A meta-analysis of 21 studies with 9222 nurses from three countries. The total mean DPET score (3.95, 95 % CI [3.81,4.10], P = 0.000), with scores on the disaster knowledge, disaster skills and disaster management dimensions were (4.06, 95 % CI [3.92,4.21], P = 0.000), (3.89, 95 % CI [3.73,4.05], P = 0.000), (3.83, 95 % CI [3.65,4.00], P = 0.000). Subgroup analyses showed an increase in nurses' total mean DPET scores after COVID-2019; the average total DPET score of emergency department nurses and nurses without disaster relief experience or training was relatively weak.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Nurses' disaster preparedness was moderate and disaster skills and management abilities needed strengthening. In the emergency department, nurses without disaster response experience and training had relatively low levels of disaster preparedness. These findings may guide nursing educators in educating nurses about disaster care.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48715,"journal":{"name":"Nurse Education in Practice","volume":"85 ","pages":"Article 104372"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nurse Education in Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1471595325001283","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim

To evaluate nurses' disaster preparedness and the impact of publication year, departments, disaster response experience and disaster training on nurses' level of disaster preparedness.

Background

With the frequent occurrence of global disaster events. As key medical relief members, nurses' preparedness has a significant impact on disaster response effectiveness.

Design

Systematic review and meta-analysis

Method

CNKI, Wanfang, VIP, SinoMed, PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library. The search period was from the creation of the database to December 4, 2024. A random effects model was used to summarize the total mean scores for the three sub-dimensions of the Disaster Preparedness Evaluation Tool. Subgroup analyses were performed to explore sources of between-study heterogeneity.

Results

A meta-analysis of 21 studies with 9222 nurses from three countries. The total mean DPET score (3.95, 95 % CI [3.81,4.10], P = 0.000), with scores on the disaster knowledge, disaster skills and disaster management dimensions were (4.06, 95 % CI [3.92,4.21], P = 0.000), (3.89, 95 % CI [3.73,4.05], P = 0.000), (3.83, 95 % CI [3.65,4.00], P = 0.000). Subgroup analyses showed an increase in nurses' total mean DPET scores after COVID-2019; the average total DPET score of emergency department nurses and nurses without disaster relief experience or training was relatively weak.

Conclusions

Nurses' disaster preparedness was moderate and disaster skills and management abilities needed strengthening. In the emergency department, nurses without disaster response experience and training had relatively low levels of disaster preparedness. These findings may guide nursing educators in educating nurses about disaster care.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
护士备灾水平:系统回顾和荟萃分析
目的评价护士备灾情况及出版年份、科室、备灾经验、备灾培训对护士备灾水平的影响。随着全球性灾害事件的频繁发生。作为医疗救援的关键成员,护士的备灾能力对灾害应对效果有着重要的影响。系统综述和meta分析方法中国知网、万方、维普、中国医学信息网、PubMed、Embase、中国国家图书馆、Web of Science和Cochrane图书馆。检索时间为数据库创建至2024年12月4日。采用随机效应模型对备灾评估工具三个子维度的总平均得分进行了汇总。进行亚组分析以探索研究间异质性的来源。结果对来自3个国家的9222名护士的21项研究进行meta分析。总意味着DPET得分(3.95,95 % CI [3.81, 4.10], P = 0.000),与灾害知识得分、灾难技能和灾害管理维度(4.06,95 % CI [3.92, 4.21], P = 0.000),(3.89,95 % CI [3.73, 4.05], P = 0.000),(3.83,95 % CI [3.65, 4.00], P = 0.000)。亚组分析显示,2019冠状病毒病后护士的总平均DPET评分有所上升;急诊科护士和没有救灾经验或培训的护士的平均DPET总得分相对较弱。结论护士备灾能力一般,灾害技能和管理能力有待加强。在急诊科,没有救灾经验和培训的护士备灾水平相对较低。这些发现可以指导护理教育者对护士进行灾难护理教育。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
9.40%
发文量
180
审稿时长
51 days
期刊介绍: Nurse Education in Practice enables lecturers and practitioners to both share and disseminate evidence that demonstrates the actual practice of education as it is experienced in the realities of their respective work environments. It is supportive of new authors and will be at the forefront in publishing individual and collaborative papers that demonstrate the link between education and practice.
期刊最新文献
The effects of simulation-based pediatric nursing laboratory education on nursing students' clinical competence, self-efficacy, and worry: A randomized controlled trial. Effectiveness of a helmet noninvasive ventilation simulation training: A quasi-experimental study. Effectiveness of scenario-based simulation in adult nursing education: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Strategic simulation-based management of triage clinical reasoning in novice emergency nurses: A randomized block design study. Corrigendum to "The effect of moulage supported standardised patient simulation on nursing students' self-efficacy and clinical practice attitudes towards pressure injuries: A randomised controlled study" [Nurse Educ. Pract. 90 (2026) 104695].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1