Workplace menstrual product policies and worker well-being: Insights from Queensland, Australia

Dialogues in health Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-20 DOI:10.1016/j.dialog.2025.100219
Melissa Judith Chalada
{"title":"Workplace menstrual product policies and worker well-being: Insights from Queensland, Australia","authors":"Melissa Judith Chalada","doi":"10.1016/j.dialog.2025.100219","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In 2022, the World Health Organization acknowledged menstrual health as a global human right and encouraged a shift in responsibility from individuals to the community. Globally, menstrual products are rarely included in workplace policies, hindering equitable well-being by placing disproportionate burden on menstruating workers. This exploratory study in Queensland, Australia supplied a public sector workplace with menstrual products for two months in 2023. A questionnaire with qualitative and quantitative aspects assessed the experiences of 21 menstruating workers. Before the supply, 94.7 % had experienced menstruation at work without access to products, leading to mental distress. Additionally, 71.4 % worried about lacking products when needed and 38.1 % believed this worry decreased their mental well-being or concentration. After the supply, 94.1 % reported improved emotions, 70.6 % perceived improved concentration and 64.7 % felt improved mental well-being. However, only 57.1 % believed that menstrual product supply should be mandated by workplace policy. Factors contributing to exclusion of menstrual products from global workplace policies are discussed, such as limited awareness, poor workplace infrastructure and persistent stigma. This study was limited by a small sample size and self-reporting bias. Regardless, the findings highlight the respective positive and negative impacts of including or omitting menstrual products in workplace policy, even in a socioeconomically privileged country like Australia. This emphasises the underestimation of menstrual health as a basic human right in workplace health and safety, urging more research on workplace menstrual product provision and related feminine sanitary infrastructure especially in low-resourced nations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72803,"journal":{"name":"Dialogues in health","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100219"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dialogues in health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772653325000164","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In 2022, the World Health Organization acknowledged menstrual health as a global human right and encouraged a shift in responsibility from individuals to the community. Globally, menstrual products are rarely included in workplace policies, hindering equitable well-being by placing disproportionate burden on menstruating workers. This exploratory study in Queensland, Australia supplied a public sector workplace with menstrual products for two months in 2023. A questionnaire with qualitative and quantitative aspects assessed the experiences of 21 menstruating workers. Before the supply, 94.7 % had experienced menstruation at work without access to products, leading to mental distress. Additionally, 71.4 % worried about lacking products when needed and 38.1 % believed this worry decreased their mental well-being or concentration. After the supply, 94.1 % reported improved emotions, 70.6 % perceived improved concentration and 64.7 % felt improved mental well-being. However, only 57.1 % believed that menstrual product supply should be mandated by workplace policy. Factors contributing to exclusion of menstrual products from global workplace policies are discussed, such as limited awareness, poor workplace infrastructure and persistent stigma. This study was limited by a small sample size and self-reporting bias. Regardless, the findings highlight the respective positive and negative impacts of including or omitting menstrual products in workplace policy, even in a socioeconomically privileged country like Australia. This emphasises the underestimation of menstrual health as a basic human right in workplace health and safety, urging more research on workplace menstrual product provision and related feminine sanitary infrastructure especially in low-resourced nations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
工作场所月经用品政策与工人福利:澳大利亚昆士兰州的启示
2022年,世界卫生组织承认月经健康是一项全球人权,并鼓励将责任从个人转移到社区。在全球范围内,经期产品很少被纳入工作场所政策,这给经期工人带来了不成比例的负担,阻碍了公平的福祉。这项在澳大利亚昆士兰州进行的探索性研究于2023年为公共部门工作场所提供了两个月的月经产品。用一份定性和定量的问卷对21名经期女工的经历进行了评估。在供应之前,94.7%的人在没有产品的情况下工作时经历过月经,导致精神困扰。此外,71.4%的人担心在需要的时候缺少产品,38.1%的人认为这种担心会降低他们的精神健康或注意力。服用后,94.1%的人表示情绪有所改善,70.6%的人认为注意力有所提高,64.7%的人感到心理健康有所改善。然而,只有57.1%的人认为经期产品的供应应该由工作场所政策强制规定。讨论了导致将月经产品排除在全球工作场所政策之外的因素,如意识有限、工作场所基础设施差和持续的耻辱。本研究受样本量小和自我报告偏倚的限制。无论如何,研究结果强调了在工作场所政策中包括或不包括月经产品各自的积极和消极影响,即使在像澳大利亚这样的社会经济特权国家也是如此。这强调了在工作场所健康和安全方面,对月经健康作为一项基本人权的低估,敦促对工作场所提供月经用品和相关的女性卫生基础设施进行更多的研究,特别是在资源匮乏的国家。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Dialogues in health
Dialogues in health Public Health and Health Policy
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
134 days
期刊最新文献
Inequalities, eating practices and beliefs among transgender women in Colombia: Mixed approaches in research Impact of nutrition education intervention on dietary intake among pregnant women with hypothyroidism – A randomized controlled trial From Eyesight to Insight: Addressing Barriers and Facilitators of Physical Activity Among Indian Elders Intersectional identity, risk behaviors, and adolescent mental health in South Korea: who suffers the most in the loneliness epidemic? Integrating education-based interventions and machine learning for stunting prevention: A case study in East Lombok, Indonesia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1