A multiple-stakeholder view of open and user innovation: Systematic review and future research agenda

IF 10.1 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science Pub Date : 2025-04-23 DOI:10.1007/s11747-025-01092-7
Keith Marion Smith, Matthew S. O’Hern, Mason R. Jenkins, Paul W. Fombelle, Charles H. Noble
{"title":"A multiple-stakeholder view of open and user innovation: Systematic review and future research agenda","authors":"Keith Marion Smith, Matthew S. O’Hern, Mason R. Jenkins, Paul W. Fombelle, Charles H. Noble","doi":"10.1007/s11747-025-01092-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The open and user innovation (OUI) literature indicates that a variety of actors can play pivotal roles in the innovation process, but to date, many of these roles are under researched and poorly understood. Through a multiple stakeholder view combined with a systematic review of the OUI literature, we identify three key stakeholder roles (creator, contributor, customer) and three separate types of actors (individuals, firms, groups) to create a 3 × 3 OUI Stakeholder Matrix typology. This matrix encompasses the major stakeholders found in the OUI literature and is designed to foster closer collaboration between open innovation and user innovation scholars. Specifically, this article prioritizes identifying and understanding overlooked innovation stakeholders to clarify how their activities might create value for both customers and firms. The authors conclude by developing a series of actionable research questions centered on four primary themes that relate to stakeholder power, stakeholder role transitions and multi-role stakeholders, firms’ beliefs around what drives value in an OUI initiative, and the possible emergence of new stakeholders in OUI programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":17194,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-025-01092-7","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The open and user innovation (OUI) literature indicates that a variety of actors can play pivotal roles in the innovation process, but to date, many of these roles are under researched and poorly understood. Through a multiple stakeholder view combined with a systematic review of the OUI literature, we identify three key stakeholder roles (creator, contributor, customer) and three separate types of actors (individuals, firms, groups) to create a 3 × 3 OUI Stakeholder Matrix typology. This matrix encompasses the major stakeholders found in the OUI literature and is designed to foster closer collaboration between open innovation and user innovation scholars. Specifically, this article prioritizes identifying and understanding overlooked innovation stakeholders to clarify how their activities might create value for both customers and firms. The authors conclude by developing a series of actionable research questions centered on four primary themes that relate to stakeholder power, stakeholder role transitions and multi-role stakeholders, firms’ beliefs around what drives value in an OUI initiative, and the possible emergence of new stakeholders in OUI programs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
开放和用户创新的多利益相关者观点:系统回顾和未来研究议程
开放和用户创新(OUI)文献表明,各种参与者可以在创新过程中发挥关键作用,但迄今为止,其中许多角色的研究和理解不足。通过多利益相关者的观点结合对OUI文献的系统回顾,我们确定了三个关键的利益相关者角色(创造者、贡献者、客户)和三种不同类型的参与者(个人、公司、团体),以创建一个3x3的OUI利益相关者矩阵类型。该矩阵包含了OUI文献中发现的主要利益相关者,旨在促进开放创新和用户创新学者之间更密切的合作。具体来说,本文优先识别和理解被忽视的创新利益相关者,以澄清他们的活动如何为客户和公司创造价值。作者最后提出了一系列可操作的研究问题,主要围绕四个主题:利益相关者权力、利益相关者角色转换和多角色利益相关者、企业对驱动OUI计划价值的信念,以及OUI计划中可能出现的新利益相关者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
30.00
自引率
7.10%
发文量
82
期刊介绍: JAMS, also known as The Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, plays a crucial role in bridging the gap between scholarly research and practical application in the realm of marketing. Its primary objective is to study and enhance marketing practices by publishing research-driven articles. When manuscripts are submitted to JAMS for publication, they are evaluated based on their potential to contribute to the advancement of marketing science and practice.
期刊最新文献
Beyond youth: The optimal age for influencer credibility and marketing success The effects of unconditional gifts on customer-firm relationships Value congruence in evaluations of product aesthetics: Political conservatives’ preference for kinderschema cute products How universities can use social media for student acquisition Where did you receive the free sample? Sustained impact of new product sample distribution on customer purchase journey
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1